Towards sustainability of marine governance: Challenges and enablers for stakeholder integration in transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea

被引:56
|
作者
Morf, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Moodie, John [2 ]
Gee, Kira [3 ]
Giacometti, Alberto [2 ]
Kull, Michael [2 ]
Piwowarczyk, Joanna [4 ]
Schiele, Kerstin [5 ]
Zaucha, Jacek [6 ]
Kellecioglu, Ilhan [2 ]
Luttmann, Anne [5 ]
Strand, Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Swedish Inst Marine Environm, Box 260, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Nordregio, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Helmholtz Zentrwn Mat & Kustenforsch GmbH, Geesthacht, Germany
[4] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, Sopot, Poland
[5] Leibniz Inst Balt Sea Res Warnemunde, Leibniz, Germany
[6] Maritime Inst Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Marine/maritime spatial planning; Stakeholder; Participation; Integration; Transboundary; PARTICIPATION; ENGAGEMENT; LADDER; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.009
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Integrating stakeholder knowledge, views and needs in marine or maritime spatial planning (MSP) processes is important from a governance and social sustainability perspective both for MSP practitioners and for the evolving field of MSP research. Transboundary MSP appears particularly challenging for participation, which is why it is important to identify opportunities and address obstacles for stakeholder integration in this specific context. This article examines how stakeholder integration is currently practiced in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR), an enclosed sea where policy coherence and addressing conflicting interests across borders are especially relevant. It synthesises a range of challenges and enablers for stakeholder participation and mobilisation that have emerged from two transboundary MSP research and development projects, BaltSpace and Baltic SCOPE. The article finds that with the exception of statutory authorities, stakeholder engagement in the BSR is mostly limited to self-motivated stakeholders and consultation rather than more inclusive forms of participation. This can reduce the quality and legitimacy of MSP processes and risks to concentrate power in the hands of a small group of actors. For transboundary stakeholder integration to become more interactive and effective, five types of challenges need attention, regarding a) timing, b) governance systems, c) capacity and processes, d) stakeholder characteristics and e) knowledge and language. These obstacles can be addressed by (1) a dedicated research and development agenda that critically reflects on integrative tools and processes, and (2) by encouraging transnational institutions in the BSR to devote more resources to transboundary stakeholder integration and adopt flexible and adaptive strategies and tools that can facilitate stakeholder involvement throughout the MSP policy cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 212
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The integration of land and marine spatial planning
    Smith, Hance D.
    Maes, Frank
    Stojanovic, Tim A.
    Ballinger, Rhoda C.
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 15 (02) : 291 - 303
  • [22] The integration of land and marine spatial planning
    Hance D. Smith
    Frank Maes
    Tim A. Stojanovic
    Rhoda C. Ballinger
    Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2011, 15 : 291 - 303
  • [23] Examining the role of integration in marine spatial planning: Towards an analytical framework to understand challenges in diverse settings
    Saunders, Fred
    Gilek, Michael
    Day, Jon
    Hassler, Bjorn
    McCann, Jennifer
    Smythe, Tiffany
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 169 : 1 - 9
  • [24] Institutional integration in transboundary marine spatial planning: A theory-based evaluative framework for practice
    Ansong, Joseph Onwona
    McElduff, Linda
    Ritchie, Heather
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 202
  • [25] Implementation of Marine Spatial Planning Instruments for Sustainable Marine Governance in Poland
    Pyc, D.
    TRANSNAV-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MARINE NAVIGATION AND SAFETY OF SEA TRANSPORTATION, 2019, 13 (02) : 311 - 316
  • [26] Built at sea Marine management and the construction of marine spatial planning
    Jay, Stephen
    TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 2010, 81 (02): : 173 - 191
  • [27] Stakeholder Perspectives on the Value of Marine Spatial Planning Towards Advancing Offshore Wind in the US
    Ryan, Kendra
    Bates, Alison
    Gopnik, Morgan
    Danylchuk, Andy
    Jordaan, Adrian
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 47 (03) : 269 - 291
  • [28] Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization
    Gissi, Elena
    McGowan, Jennifer
    Venier, Chiara
    Di Carlo, Davide
    Musco, Francesco
    Menegon, Stefano
    Mackelworth, Peter
    Agardy, Tundi
    Possingham, Hugh
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (05) : 1107 - 1117
  • [29] Rising to the integration ambitions of Marine Spatial Planning: Reflections from the Irish Sea
    Kidd, Sue
    MARINE POLICY, 2013, 39 : 273 - 282
  • [30] Marine spatial planning and ocean accounting: Synergistic tools enhancing integration in ocean governance
    Gacutan, Jordan
    Galparsoro, Ibon
    Pinarbasi, Kemal
    Murillas, Arantza
    Adewumi, Ibukun J.
    Praphotjanaporn, Teerapong
    Johnston, Emma L.
    Findlay, Ken P.
    Milligan, Ben M.
    MARINE POLICY, 2022, 136