AlphaDogfight Trials: Bringing Autonomy to Air Combat

被引:0
|
作者
DeMay, Christopher R. [1 ]
White, Edward L. [1 ]
Dunham, William D. [1 ]
Pino, Johnathan A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Force Project Sect, Appl Phys Lab, Laurel, MD 20723 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Natl Secur Anal Dept, Appl Phys Lab, Laurel, MD USA
来源
JOHNS HOPKINS APL TECHNICAL DIGEST | 2022年 / 36卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Air Combat Evolution (ACE) program "seeks to increase trust in combat autonomy by using human-machine collaborative dogfighting as its challenge problem. This also serves as an entry point into complex human-machine collaboration " (https://www.darpa.mil/program/air-combat-evolution). To set the stage for ACE, the AlphaDogfight Trials program was created to explore whether artificial intelligence (AI) agents could effectively learn basic fighter maneuvers. DARPA contracted the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) to create an arena to host simulated dogfights- close-range aerial battles between fighter aircraft-where autonomous agents could be trained to defeat adversary aircraft. During the dogfight trials, AI agents competed against each other and the winner competed against a human pilot. By the end of the trials, the program demon-strated that AI agents could surpass the performance of human experts. APL was critical to the success of this program: the Lab created the simulation infrastructure, developed the adversary AI agents, and evaluated the competitors' AI solutions. This article details APL's role in advancing combat autonomy through this program.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 163
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A survey of air combat artificial intelligence
    Sun, Zhixiao
    Yang, Shengqi
    Piao, Haiyin
    Bai, Chengchao
    Ge, Jun
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42 (08):
  • [42] Implementing Air Combat Guidance Laws
    Merz, A. W.
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1989, 111 (04): : 605 - 608
  • [43] The "UTA": redefining the air combat system
    Francis, MS
    NOUVELLE REVUE AERONAUTIQUE ASTRONAUTIQUE, 1998, (04): : 33 - 38
  • [44] SIMPLIFIED MODELS FOR AIR COMBAT ANALYSIS
    SHINAR, J
    SPITZER, A
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF SYSTEMS, 1989, 3 : 323 - 328
  • [45] The UTA: Redefining the air combat system
    Francis, MS
    AEROSPACE AMERICA, 1998, 36 (05) : 44 - +
  • [46] Implementing air combat guidance laws
    Merz, A.W., 1600, (111):
  • [47] THRUST VECTORING/REVERSING TACTICS IN AIR-TO-AIR COMBAT
    BOPPE, CW
    MARTORELLA, RP
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1994, 116 (01): : 124 - 132
  • [48] SIMULATOR NETWORKING IN HELICOPTER AIR-TO-AIR COMBAT TRAINING
    DEES, JW
    CORNETT, TR
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1990, 27 (04): : 381 - 382
  • [49] MODELING OF IR COUNTERMEASURES IN AIR-TO-AIR COMBAT SIMULATIONS
    HEATON, KC
    EVANS, JR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1989 SUMMER COMPUTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, 1989, : 846 - 851
  • [50] SIMULATOR NETWORKING IN HELICOPTER AIR-TO-AIR COMBAT TRAINING
    DEES, JW
    CORNETT, TR
    AIAA FLIGHT SIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION: A COLLECTION OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 1989, : 426 - 428