Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation

被引:2
|
作者
Liu, Yingliang [1 ]
Zhang, Xu [2 ]
Yu, Yadong [2 ]
Ding, Weifeng [3 ]
Gao, Yong [1 ]
Wang, Yanting [1 ]
Yang, Rong [1 ]
Dhawan, Vikas [4 ]
机构
[1] Peoples Hosp Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Dept Orthopaed, Chuxiong City, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Hand Surg, Hosp 3, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Dali Univ, Clin Med Dept, Dali, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] St Louis Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hand & Microsurg, Sch Med, SLU Acad Pavilion 1008 S Spring Ave, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
acromioclavicular ligament; coracoclavicular ligament; dislocation; Rockwood; HOOK-PLATE; SHOULDER;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000027007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The objective of this report was to introduce a new suture augmentation of coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute Rockwood grade III to V acromioclavicular dislocations. From January 2015 to January 2019, 43 patients with Rockwood III to VI acute acromioclavicular dislocations were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, another series of 28 patients treated with double Endobutton technique from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed. A P < .05 was considered statistical significance. The mean follow-up period of the 2 series were 39.69 +/- 7.42 months (range, 24-54 months) and 37.86 +/- 8.23 months (range, 26-48 months) (P > .05), respectively. There were significant differences regarding CC space (11.62 +/- 2.54 mm vs 16.78 +/- 5.53 mm; P < .05), CC reduction loss (5.56 +/- 4.73 mm vs 26.25 +/- 4.42 mm; P < .05), and acromioclavicular space (6.89 +/- 1.87 mm vs 7.95 +/- 2.37 mm; P < .05). There were significant differences regarding the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (3.3 +/- 2.8 vs 5.32 +/- 4.37; P < .05) and University of California-Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (31.19 +/- 2.48 vs 29.24 +/- 2.48; P < .05). The excellent to good percentages were 100% (n = 32) and 85% (n = 23), respectively. In conclusion, the suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and CC ligament reconstruction is a reliable technique for acute acromioclavicular dislocation with minimal complications. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IIa.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation
    Chung-Ting Liu
    Ten-Fang Yang
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [22] Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint
    Liu, Tao
    Bao, Fei-long
    Jiang, Tao
    Ji, Guang-wei
    Li, Jian-min
    Jerosch, Joerg
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (05) : 1362 - 1371
  • [23] Is coracoclavicular reconstruction necessary in hook plate fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation?
    Yu-Ta Chen
    Kuan-Ting Wu
    Shun-Wun Jhan
    Shan-Ling Hsu
    Hao-Chen Liu
    Ching-Jen Wang
    Jih-Yang Ko
    Wen-Yi Chou
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [24] Is coracoclavicular reconstruction necessary in hook plate fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation?
    Chen, Yu-Ta
    Wu, Kuan-Ting
    Jhan, Shun-Wun
    Hsu, Shan-Ling
    Liu, Hao-Chen
    Wang, Ching-Jen
    Ko, Jih-Yang
    Chou, Wen-Yi
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [25] Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Stabilization of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation By Suspensory Fixation System
    Martetschlaeger, Frank
    Tauber, Mark
    Habermeyer, Peter
    Selim, Hisham Anis
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (06): : E611 - E615
  • [26] Treatment of Failed Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstructions: Primary Acromioclavicular Ligament and Capsular Reconstruction and Revision Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction
    Jildeh, Toufic R.
    Peebles, Annalise M.
    Brown, Justin R.
    Mologne, Mitchell S.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2022, 11 (08): : E1387 - E1393
  • [27] Anatomic Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Separations: The Gracilis Weave
    Lewicky, Yuri M.
    Robertson, Catherine M.
    Foran, Jared R. H.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 33 (03) : 166 - 171
  • [28] Surgical Pearls and Pitfalls for Anatomic Acromioclavicular/ Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction
    Chang, Peter S.
    Murphy, Colin P.
    Whalen, Ryan J.
    Apostolakos, John M.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    [J]. CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (04) : 621 - 632
  • [29] Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Moatshe, Gilbert
    Kruckeberg, Bradley M.
    Chahla, Jorge
    Godin, Jonathan A.
    Cinque, Mark E.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (06): : 1979 - +
  • [30] ACROMIOCLAVICULAR AND CORACOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING A SINGLE TENDON GRAFT
    Campbell, S.
    Shin, S.
    Scott, J.
    Hwang, J.
    Lee, T. Q.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (01) : 241 - 242