Prospective Validation of Gallium-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer

被引:83
|
作者
van Kalmthout, Ludwike W. M. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
van Melick, Harm H. E. [3 ,4 ]
Lavalaye, Jules [5 ,6 ]
Meijer, Richard P. [2 ]
Kooistra, Anko [7 ]
de Klerk, John M. H. [8 ]
Braat, Arthur J. A. T. [1 ]
Kaldeway, H. Peter [5 ,6 ]
de Bruin, Peter C. [9 ,10 ]
de Keizer, Bart [1 ]
Lam, Marnix G. E. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Oncol Urol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[4] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[6] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[8] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[9] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Pathol, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[10] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Pathol, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 203卷 / 03期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm metastasis; lymph nodes; neoplasm staging; positron emission tomography computed tomography; EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PET/CT; COMPLICATIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000531
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Prospective validation of Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography is lacking in initial staging of prostate cancer. In this study we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for detecting lymph node metastasis in patients with intermediate-high risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and negative bone scan findings at greater than 10% MSKCC (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) risk for lymph node metastasis were prospectively included in study from October 2017 to October 2018. In candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography was performed prior to planned surgery. Scan results were evaluated in a second tumor board meeting to assess a potential change of management. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for detecting lymph node metastasis were calculated per patient and per resection template using histopathology as the reference. A positron emission tomography based change of management was also reported. Results: A total of 103 patients were eligible for analysis and 97 extended pelvic lymph node dissections were performed. In 41 patients (42.3%) there was a total of 85 lymph node metastases. Positron emission tomography was positive in 17 patients, resulting in 41.5% patient based sensitivity (95% CI 26.7-57.8) for detecting lymph node metastasis. The patient based specificity rate was 90.9% (95% CI 79.3-96.6), and positive and negative predictive values were 77.3% (95% CI 54.2-91.3) and 67.6% (95% CI 55.6-77.7), respectively. A positron emission tomography based change of treatment was observed in 13 patients (12.6%). Conclusions: In patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer at greater than 10% MSKCC risk for lymph node involvement Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography detected lymph node metastasis with high specificity and moderate sensitivity. This led to a treatment change in 12.6% of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 544
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in the management of recurrent prostate cancer
    Afaq, Asim
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2018, 128 (01) : 37 - 48
  • [42] Patterns of Failure in Men With Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Prospective Gallium 68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Trials
    Smith, Clayton P.
    Xiang, Michael
    Armstrong, Wesley R.
    Nickols, Nicholas G.
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Rettig, Matthew
    Weiner, Adam B.
    Shen, John
    Valle, Luca
    Czernin, Johannes
    Calais, Jeremie
    Kishan, Amar U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 116 (05): : 1079 - 1084
  • [43] Standardised Uptake Value of Primary Prostate Cancer on 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as a Predictor of Biopsy Pathology
    Kalapara, Arveen A.
    Ballok, Zita E.
    Ramdave, Shakher
    Grummet, Jeremy
    Ryan, Andrew
    Frydenberg, Mark
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 : 37 - 37
  • [44] Standardised uptake value of primary prostate cancer on 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a predictor of biopsy pathology
    Kalapara, Arveen A.
    Ballok, Zita E.
    Ramdave, Shakher
    Grummet, Jeremy
    Ryan, Andrew
    Frydenberg, Mark
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 : 12 - 12
  • [45] Evaluation of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (GA-68 PSMA PET/CT) in recurrent prostate cancer: a retrospective review of initial clinical experience at Tygerberg Hospital
    Sangiwa, Bright Awadh
    Burger, Celeste
    Ellmann, Annare
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 48
  • [46] PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY FOR PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER (PREP) - A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTRE REGISTRY
    Dhar, Aneesh
    Bauman, Glenn
    Mendez, Lucas
    Kulkarni, Girish
    Finelli, Antonio
    Berlin, Alejandro
    Chung, Peter
    Bayley, Andrew
    Chung, Hans
    Klotz, Laurence
    Wolfson, Robert
    Lukka, Himu
    Zukotynski, Katherine
    Kapoor, Anil
    Shayegan, Bobby
    Chin, Joseph
    Hildebrand, Catherine
    Rachinsky, Irina
    Leung, Eugene
    Lavallee, Luke
    Morash, Chris
    Tiberi, David
    Hagerty, Marlon
    Ramchandar, Kevin
    Boekhoud, Jonathan
    Shahrour, Walid
    Langer, Deanna
    MacCrostie, Pamela
    Mak, Victor
    Metser, Ur
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 186 : S108 - S108
  • [47] Comparison of 68Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ling, Sui Wai
    de Jong, Anouk C.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Nasserinejad, Kazem
    Busstra, Martijn B.
    van der Veldt, Astrid A. M.
    Brabander, Tessa
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 33 : 61 - 71
  • [48] How to deal with a negative Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) during biochemical recurrence?
    Lanzafame, H.
    Serani, F.
    Farolfi, A.
    Malizia, C.
    Fanti, S.
    Mei, R.
    Aluisio, G.
    Medici, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (SUPPL 1) : S265 - S265
  • [49] Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Gallium-68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Detecting Carcinoma Prostate in Patients with Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen between 4 and 20 ng/ml
    Soni, Brijesh Kumar
    Verma, Priyanka
    Shah, Amit Kumar
    Singh, Rajendra
    Sonawane, Sunita
    Asopa, Ramesh, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (03): : 245 - 251
  • [50] Use of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Nodal Staging in Prostate Cancer and Tailoring of Treatment: A Continuing Conundrum
    Stranne, Johan
    Henry, Ann
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2025, 87 (02) : 108 - 109