An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair

被引:128
|
作者
Cundiff, GW [1 ]
Weidner, AC [1 ]
Visco, AG [1 ]
Addison, WA [1 ]
Bump, RC [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Specialties, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
perineal descent; perineorrhaphy; posterior colporrhaphy; posterior repair; rectocele repair;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean Values for the points describing the posterior Vaginal wall improved >2 cm (P <.0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm (P <.0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1456
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic or transanal repair of rectocele? Comparison of a reduction in rectocele size
    Tsunoda, Akira
    Takahashi, Tomoko
    Matsuda, Satoshi
    Kusanagi, Hiroshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [32] Endorectal repair of rectocele revisited
    Khubchandani, IT
    Clancy, JP
    Rosen, L
    Riether, RD
    Stasik, JJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (01) : 89 - 91
  • [33] Relationship between anatomic and symptomatic long-term results after rectocele repair for impaired defecation
    Van Laarhoven, CJHM
    Kamm, MA
    Bartram, CI
    Halligan, S
    Hawley, PR
    Phillips, RKS
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (02) : 204 - 210
  • [34] Laparoscopic or transanal repair of rectocele? Comparison of a reduction in rectocele size
    Akira Tsunoda
    Tomoko Takahashi
    Satoshi Matsuda
    Hiroshi Kusanagi
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [35] Functional Disorders: Rectocele
    Mustain, W. Conan
    CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2017, 30 (01) : 63 - 75
  • [36] Rectocele repair: When and how?
    Lukacz E.S.
    Luber K.M.
    Current Urology Reports, 2002, 3 (5) : 418 - 422
  • [37] Outcome and medium-term functional results of anterior rectopexy for rectocele repair
    Bogaerts-Samama, M. J. W.
    Driessen, S. R. C.
    Jenninga, E.
    Delemarre, J. B. V. M.
    Trimbos, J. B.
    Westerweel, M. E.
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2014, 11 (04) : 257 - 260
  • [38] Functional outcome after transperineal rectocele repair with porcine dermal collagen implant
    Smart, Neil J.
    Mercer-Jones, Mark A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (09) : 1422 - 1427
  • [39] Transabdominal rectocele repair.
    Halverson, AL
    Orkin, BA
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (04) : A1514 - A1514
  • [40] A three-year prospective assessment of rectocele repair using porcine xenograft
    Altman, D
    Zetterström, J
    Mellgren, A
    Gustafsson, C
    Anzén, B
    López, A
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (01): : 59 - 65