Passive Flow Control of Ahmed Body using Control Rod

被引:0
|
作者
Sumnu, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iskenderun Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Aerosp Engn, TR-31200 Antakya, Turkey
关键词
Ahmed Body; CFD; Drag force; Flow separation; Control rod; SEPARATION CONTROL; AIRFOIL; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.15282/ijame.19.4.2022.03.0777
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In the current study, numerical analysis of passive control flow with a control rod for Ahmed body is performed at different slant angles and velocities and placed rod locations on the slant surface. The aim of the study is to improve aerodynamic performance by preventing flow separation on the slant surface of Ahmed body using a control rod. This passive flow control method uses a control rod that has not been applied for simplified ground vehicles before. Therefore, it can be said that this study is a new example in point of a passive flow control application for Ahmed body. The solution of the study is performed by using the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. The solutions are firstly performed for baseline geometry, and the results are compared with experimental data reported in the literature for validation. CFD solutions are carried out by means of the ANSYS and RNG k-(sic) turbulence model is used to simulate flow -field since it captures the effect of turbulent flow. The solutions used a control rod with a 20 mm diameter performed at a dimensionless location (X/L=0.057 and 0.153) for Ahmed body. The results are presented visually in the figures, and drag coefficient values are also given in Table format. It is concluded that the rod application is useful for some specified slant angles and velocities since flow separation delays and suppresses the slant surface. The maximum drag reduction is achieved at about 6.153% at a slant angle of 35 degrees and 20 m/s velocity of air, and location of control rod of 0.057, while the minimum drag reduction is about 1.048% at slant angle of 25 degrees and velocity of air at 40 m/s and location of control rod of 0.153.
引用
收藏
页码:10063 / 10072
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Passive flow control of a stalled airfoil using a microcylinder
    Luo, Dahai
    Huang, Diangui
    Sun, Xiaojing
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2017, 170 : 256 - 273
  • [32] Effect of the vortex dynamics on the drag coefficient of a square back Ahmed body: Application to the flow control
    Bruneau, Charles-Henri
    Creuse, Emmanuel
    Gillieron, Patrick
    Mortazavi, Iraj
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2014, 45 : 1 - 11
  • [33] Active wake-flow control for a notchback Ahmed body driven by a genetically inspired optimization
    He, Kan
    Minelli, Guglielmo
    Su, Xinchao
    Huang, Ning
    Krajnovic, Sinisa
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2024, 1000
  • [34] Numerical analysis of flow past over a triangular rod through passive control method
    Manzoor, Raheela
    Habib, Rida
    Nadeem, Noreen
    Kalsoom, Shazia
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (03)
  • [35] Control of flow around square cylinders at incidence by using a rod
    Sarioglu, M
    Akansu, YE
    Yavuz, T
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2005, 43 (07) : 1419 - 1426
  • [36] Control of flow around square cylinders at incidence by using a rod
    Sarioglu, M. (sarioglu@ktu.edu.tr), 1600, American Inst. Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (43):
  • [37] Numerical study of flow past two square cylinders with horizontal detached control rod through passive control method
    Kalsoom, Shazia
    Abbasi, Waqas Sarwar
    Manzoor, Raheela
    AIP ADVANCES, 2024, 14 (06)
  • [38] Passive flow control of jets
    Shakouchi, Toshihiko
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [39] Passive control of backstep flow
    Heenan, AF
    Morrison, JF
    EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 1998, 16 (1-2) : 122 - 132
  • [40] AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO IMPROVE DRAG CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR THE AHMED BODY
    Bruneau, Charles-Henri
    Creuse, Emmanuel
    Depeyras, Delphine
    Gillieron, Patrick
    Mortazavi, Iraj
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME/JSME/KSME JOINT FLUIDS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2011, VOL 1, PTS A-D, 2012, : 1025 - 1031