Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group: Implications of the UK High Court's Decision

被引:1
|
作者
Farrington, Francesca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Fac Law, Cambridge, England
关键词
access to justice; Brexit; duty of care; forum non conveniens; jurisdiction;
D O I
10.1017/bhj.2021.10
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The High Court of England and Wales in its November 2020 judgment in Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group (BHP) declined jurisdiction to hear the case initiated by victims of the Fundao&tild; Dam collapse in Brazil on the grounds of abuse of process. The decision raises serious questions about the Court's willingness to vindicate the fair trial rights of victims of human rights abuses linked to multinational enterprises (MNEs). In this judgment, Turner J also made obiter comments on the possibility of staying the case on application of Article 34 of the Recast Brussels Regulation (Recast Regulation) the doctrine of forum non conveniens (FNC), and/or the Court's case management discretion. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press. © 2021 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 398
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条