Machine Learning for Risk and Resilience Assessment in Structural Engineering: Progress and Future Trends

被引:90
|
作者
Wang, Xiaowei [1 ]
Mazumder, Ram K. [2 ]
Salarieh, Babak [3 ]
Salman, Abdullahi M. [3 ]
Shafieezadeh, Abdollah [4 ]
Li, Yue [5 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Bridge Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Machine learning (ML); Artificial intelligence; Risk; Resilience; Structural engineering; Buildings; Bridges; Pipelines; Electric power systems; PIPELINE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT; CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS; FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; SHEAR-STRENGTH; CASCADING FAILURES; STATISTICAL-MODELS; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; SUPPORTED BRIDGES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; POWER OUTAGES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003392
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Population growth, economic development, and rapid urbanization in many areas have led to increased exposure and vulnerability of structural and infrastructure systems to hazards. Thus, developing risk-based assessment and management tools is crucial for stakeholders and the general public to make informed decisions on prehazard planning and posthazard recovery. To this end, structural risk and resilience assessment has been an ongoing research topic in the past 20 years. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have been shown as promising tools for advancing the risk and resilience assessment of structure and infrastructure systems. To date, however, there is a lack of a holistic review on ML progress across various branches of structural engineering; an in-depth analysis of literature that can provide a timely evaluation of risk and resilience assessment methods of the built environment, where different types of structural and infrastructure facilities are interconnected. For this reason, this study conducted a comprehensive review on ML for risk and resilience assessment in four main branches of structural engineering (buildings, bridges, pipelines, and electric power systems). To cover the crucial modules in the prevailing risk and resilience assessment frameworks, existing literature is thoroughly examined and characterized in terms of six attributes of ML, including method, task type, data source, analysis scale, event type, and topic area. Moreover, limitations and challenges are identified, and future research needs are highlighted to move forward the frontiers of ML for structural risk and resilience assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning methods for wildfire risk assessment
    Brys, Carlos
    Martinez, David Luis La Red
    Marinelli, Marcelo
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [42] Enterprise Risk Assessment Based on Machine Learning
    Huang, Boning
    Wei, Junkang
    Tang, Yuhong
    Liu, Chang
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 2021
  • [43] Regional seismic risk and resilience assessment: Methodological development, applicability, and future research needs-An earthquake engineering perspective
    Du, Ao
    Wang, Xiaowei
    Xie, Yazhou
    Dong, You
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 233
  • [44] Artificial intelligence, machine learning and GIS in environmental engineering: current trends
    Hernandez-Alpizar, Laura
    Gomez-Mejia, Jose Andres
    Arguello-Vega, Maria Belen
    TECNOLOGIA EN MARCHA, 2024, 37 : 87 - 96
  • [45] Progress and Future Challenges of Security Attacks and Defense Mechanisms in Machine Learning
    Li X.-J.
    Wu G.-W.
    Yao L.
    Zhang W.-Z.
    Zhang B.
    Wu, Guo-Wei (wgwdut@dlut.edu.cn), 1600, Chinese Academy of Sciences (32): : 406 - 423
  • [46] Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review
    Thai, Huu-Tai
    STRUCTURES, 2022, 38 : 448 - 491
  • [47] Leveraging Machine Learning for Cybersecurity Resilience in Industry 4.0: Challenges and Future Directions
    Yu, Jia
    Shvetsov, Alexey V.
    Alsamhi, Saeed Hamood
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 159579 - 159596
  • [48] Historical and future trends in emergency pituitary referrals: a machine learning analysis
    Pandit, A. S.
    Khan, D. Z.
    Hanrahan, J. G.
    Dorward, N. L.
    Baldeweg, S.
    Nachev, P.
    Marcus, H. J.
    PITUITARY, 2022, 25 (06) : 927 - 937
  • [49] Machine Learning Applications in Manufacturing-Challenges, Trends, and Future Directions
    Manta-Costa, Alexandre
    Araujo, Sara Oleiro
    Peres, Ricardo Silva
    Barata, Jose
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF THE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2024, 5 : 1085 - 1103
  • [50] Machine learning applications in the diagnosis of leukemia: Current trends and future directions
    Salah, Haneen T.
    Muhsen, Ibrahim N.
    Salama, Mohamed E.
    Owaidah, Tarek
    Hashmi, Shahrukh K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2019, 41 (06) : 717 - 725