Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center

被引:1
|
作者
Carroll, Peter R. [1 ]
Chu, Carissa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 203卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
neoplasm grading; prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000742.01
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose:We studied the risk of metastatic prostate cancer development in men with Grade Group 2 disease managed with active surveillance at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.Materials and Methods:A total of 219 men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer had disease managed with active surveillance between 2000 and 2017. Biopsy was performed every 2 to 3 years, or upon changes in magnetic resonance imaging, prostate specific antigen level or digital rectal examination. The primary outcome was development of distant metastasis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate treatment-free survival.Results:Median age at diagnosis was 67 years (IQR 61-72), median prostate specific antigen was 5 ng/ml (IQR 4-7) and most patients (69%) had nonpalpable disease. During followup 64 men received treatment, including radical prostatectomy in 36 (56%), radiotherapy in 20 (31%), hormone therapy in 3 (5%) and focal therapy in 5 (8%). Of the 36 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy 32 (89%) had Grade Group 2 disease on pathology and 4 (11%) had Grade Group 3 disease. Treatment-free survival was 61% (95% CI 52-70) at 5 years and 49% (95% CI 37-60) at 10 years. Three men experienced biochemical recurrence, no men had distant metastasis and no men died of prostate cancer during the followup. Median followup was 3.1 years (IQR 1.9-4.9).Conclusions:Active surveillance appears to be a safe initial management strategy in the short term for carefully selected and closely monitored men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer treated at a tertiary cancer center. Definitive conclusions await further followup. © 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1121
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cell cycle progression score in men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance
    Poulsen, Mads H.
    Mortensen, Mike Allan
    Lund, Lars
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 51 : 58 - 58
  • [22] Re: Active Surveillance for Men with Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Koehne, Elizabeth L.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (06) : 892 - 893
  • [23] Active Surveillance for Men with Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer COMMENT
    Chu, Carissa
    Carroll, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (01): : 121 - 121
  • [24] Active surveillance for men with low-risk prostate cancer
    Sturch, Paul
    Kirby, Roger
    Challacombe, Ben
    TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MENS HEALTH, 2014, 5 (02) : 14 - 16
  • [25] Re: Risk Group and Death from Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance in Men with Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02): : 412 - 413
  • [26] Re: Risk Group and Death From Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (02) : 370 - 370
  • [27] IMPACT OF THREE MEASURES OF INHERITED PROSTATE CANCER RISK ON UPGRADING DURING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER
    De La Calle, Claire
    Fountain, Julia
    Fletcher, Sean
    Jing, Yuezhou
    Landis, Patricia
    Wei, Jun
    Shi, Zhuqing
    Zheng, S. Lilly
    Xu, Jianfeng
    Isaacs, William
    Pavlovich, Christian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E525 - E526
  • [28] Active surveillance should not be routinely considered in ISUP grade group 2 prostate cancer
    Giorgio Gandaglia
    Riccardo Leni
    Sophie Plagakis
    Armando Stabile
    Francesco Montorsi
    Alberto Briganti
    BMC Urology, 23
  • [29] Active surveillance should not be routinely considered in ISUP grade group 2 prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Leni, Riccardo
    Plagakis, Sophie
    Stabile, Armando
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    BMC UROLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [30] Identifying Men Who Can Remain on Active Surveillance Despite Biopsy Reclassification to Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer
    Baraban, Ezra
    Erak, Eric
    Fatima, Aisha
    Akbari, Amir
    Zhao, Jianping
    Fletcher, Sean A.
    Bhanji, Yasin
    de la Calle, Claire M.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Landis, Patricia
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 210 (01): : 99 - 107