Comparison of Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes of High-dose Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy for Patients With Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:76
|
作者
Zelefsky, Michael J. [1 ]
Yamada, Yoshiya
Pei, Xin
Hunt, Margie
Cohen, Gilad
Zhang, Zhigang
Zaider, Marco
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; IMPLANTATION; MORBIDITY; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; TRIAL; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.539
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To compare the long-term, prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival outcome and incidence of toxicity for patients with low-risk prostate cancer who underwent brachytherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT). METHODS A total of 729 consecutive patients underwent brachytherapy (n = 448; prescription dose 144 Gy) or intensity-modulated RT alone (n = 281; prescription dose 81 Gy). The prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival using the nadir plus 2 ng/mL definition and late toxicity using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were determined. RESULTS The 7-year prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival rate for the brachytherapy and intensity-modulated RT groups was 95% and 89% for low-risk patients, respectively (P = .004). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that brachytherapy was associated with improved prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival, even after adjustment for other variables. The incidence of metastatic disease between treatment sessions was low for both treatment groups. Late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in 5.1% and 1.4% of the brachytherapy and intensity-modulated RT groups, respectively (P = .02). No significant differences were seen between treatment groups for late grade 3 or greater rectal complications (brachytherapy 1.1% and intensity-modulated RT 0%; P = .19). Late grade 2 urinary toxicity occurred more often in the brachytherapy group than in the intensity-modulated RT group (15.6% and 4.3%, respectively; P < .0001). No significant differences were seen between the 2 treatment groups for late grade 3 urinary toxicity (brachytherapy 2.2% and intensity-modulated RT 1.4%; P = .62). CONCLUSIONS Among low-risk prostate cancer patients, the 7-year biochemical tumor control was superior for intraoperatively planned brachytherapy compared with high-dose intensity-modulated RT. Although significant toxicities were minimal for both groups, modest, but significant, increases in grade 2 urinary and rectal symptoms were noted for brachytherapy compared with intensity-modulated RT. UROLOGY 77: 986-993, 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 990
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes of High-dose Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy for Patients With Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Roach, Mack, III
    UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (04) : 991 - 992
  • [2] Ten-Year Outcomes of High-Dose, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Alicikus, Zumre A.
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Pei, Xin
    Hunt, Margie
    Kollmeier, Marisa
    Cox, Brett
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (07) : 1429 - 1437
  • [3] Clinical Results after High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Villeirs, Geert
    Ost, Piet
    De Meerleer, Gert
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2012, 2012
  • [4] A MATCHED CONTROL ANALYSIS OF ADJUVANT AND SALVAGE HIGH-DOSE POSTOPERATIVE INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Ost, Piet
    De Troyer, Bart
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Oosterlinck, Willem
    De Meerleer, Gert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (05): : 1316 - 1322
  • [5] Patient reported toxicity and quality of life after hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for intermediate- and high risk prostate cancer
    Houben, Jeroen
    McColl, Gill
    Kaanders, Johannes Ham
    Smeenk, Robert J.
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 29 : 40 - 46
  • [6] Clinical outcomes and late toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Wang, Michael
    Pearcey, Robert
    Pervez, Nadeem
    Yee, Don
    Mihai, Alina
    Patel, Samir
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06)
  • [7] CLINICAL APPLICATION OF HIGH-DOSE, IMAGE-GUIDED INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY IN HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Bayley, Andrew
    Rosewall, Tara
    Craig, Tim
    Bristow, Rob
    Chung, Peter
    Gospodarowicz, Mary
    Menard, Cynthia
    Milosevic, Michael
    Warde, Padraig
    Catton, Charles
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (02): : 477 - 483
  • [8] Dose painting in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Oehler, W
    Baum, RP
    Buth, KJ
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2004, 180 : 53 - 53
  • [9] Intestinal problems after intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate cancer with a Spacer - Matched Pair comparison with patients after low-dose and high-dose Radiotherapy
    Pinkawa, M.
    Piroth, M. D.
    Holy, R.
    Djukic, V
    Klotz, J.
    Schaar, S.
    Eble, M. J.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 : 36 - 36
  • [10] High-dose reirradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent head-and-neck cancer: Disease control, survival and toxicity
    Duprez, Frederic
    Berwouts, Dieter
    Madani, Indira
    Bonte, Katrien
    Boterberg, Tom
    De Gersem, Werner
    Deron, Philippe
    Huvenne, Wouter
    De Neve, Wilfried
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 (03) : 388 - 392