Extractive polymeric membrane bioreactors for industrial wastewater treatment: Theory and practice

被引:8
|
作者
Manetti, Marco [1 ]
Tomei, Maria Concetta [1 ]
机构
[1] CNR, Water Res Inst, Via Salaria Km 29-300,CP 10, I-00015 Rome, Italy
关键词
Extractive membrane bioreactor; Recalcitrant contaminant; Diffusive membrane; Industrial wastewater; Biomass inhibition; Biofilm control; 2-PHASE PARTITIONING BIOREACTOR; BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; PHENOL REMOVAL; COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; ATTACHED BIOFILMS; BIODEGRADATION; DETOXIFICATION; WASTEWATERS; REACTOR; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2022.03.063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Treatment of industrial wastewaters with current technologies can be very challenging, due to the presence of toxic and persistent compounds and to unfavorable pH conditions, which exert toxic/inhibitory effects on the biomass. Extractive membrane bioreactor (EMB) is a promising technology capable to overcome these difficulties. The system ensures separation between "hostile" wastewater and the biomass, allowing the gradual release of contaminants in the bioreactor under a concentration gradient, through an absorptive/diffusive membrane. Depending on thermodynamic affinity, the membrane is permeable only to target compounds, thus ensuring a "selective" extraction. In this review, earlier PDMS and newest polymeric membrane reactors have been analyzed, highlighting their potentialities and the still open research issues. The effects of biofilm formation, reactor configuration and operative parameters, such as Hydraulic Retention Time and geometric configuration, have been discussed. Despite good results in terms of contaminants removal, these parameters strongly affect reactor performance and further investigations are necessary. Furthermore, data analysis showed that this technology is ready for upscaling and this step is crucial for a full evaluation of the feasibility of a technology that could bring a remarkable improvement for industrial wastewater treatment. (c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:169 / 186
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extractive membrane bioreactor (EMBR) for industrial wastewater treatment: From theory to practice
    Adeel, Mister
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 26
  • [2] Membrane Bioreactors for Industrial Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review
    Lin, Hongjun
    Gao, Weijue
    Meng, Fangang
    Liao, Bao-Qiang
    Leung, Kam-Tin
    Zhao, Leihong
    Chen, Jianrong
    Hong, Huachang
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 42 (07) : 677 - 740
  • [3] Membrane bioreactors in wastewater treatment
    Peters, TA
    Günther, R
    Vossenkaul, K
    FILTRATION & SEPARATION, 2000, 37 (01): : 18 - 21
  • [4] Membrane bioreactors in industrial wastewater treatment - European experiences, examples and trends
    Cornel, P
    Krause, S
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (03) : 37 - 44
  • [5] Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment
    Chang, IS
    Le Clech, P
    Jefferson, B
    Judd, S
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (11) : 1018 - 1029
  • [6] Membrane bioreactors for treatment of galvanic wastewater
    Makisha, Nikolay
    XXII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: CONSTRUCTION THE FORMATION OF LIVING ENVIRONMENT (FORM-2019), 2019, 97
  • [7] Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater
    Galil, NI
    Sheindorf, C
    Stahl, N
    Tenenbaum, A
    Levinsky, Y
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 48 (08) : 103 - 110
  • [8] Membrane separation bioreactors for wastewater treatment
    Visvanathan, C
    Ben Aim, R
    Parameshwaran, K
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 30 (01) : 1 - 48
  • [9] Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment
    Le-Clech, Pierre
    Chen, Vicki
    Fane, Tony A. G.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 284 (1-2) : 17 - 53
  • [10] Dimensioning of membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment
    Wedi, Detlef
    Joss, Adriano
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 57 (06) : 829 - 835