Cost-effectiveness, fairness and adverse selection in mutual aid

被引:3
|
作者
Chen, Ze [1 ]
Feng, Runhuan [2 ]
Wei, Li [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhao, Jiaqi [3 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, China Inst Insurance, Sch Finance, Dept Insurance, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Math, Champaign, IL USA
[3] PICC Capital Insurance Asset Management Co Ltd, Infrastruct Investment Dept 2, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Renmin Univ China, Sch Finance, Dept Insurance, 59 Zhongguancun Rd, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[5] Renmin Univ China, China Insurance Inst, 59, Zhongguancun Rd, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
actuarial fairness; adverse selection; InsurTech; mutual aid; risk sharing; INSURANCE MARKETS; HEALTH-INSURANCE; INFORMATION; MODEL; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/eufm.12450
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Online mutual aid (MA) is a novel form of ex-post risk sharing empowered by InsurTech to provide critical illness coverage without involving an insurer. In this paper, we first provide a rigorous examination of the underpinning theory and analyze MA model's cost-effectiveness. In addition, we theoretically investigate the condition for MA's actuarial fairness among all participants. Our numerical illustration also shows that current MA plans lack the consideration of actuarial fairness as they differentiate members only by gender and age group of large bandwidths. Last, our empirical analysis confirms the existence of adverse selection due to the lack of actuarial fairness.
引用
收藏
页码:1510 / 1544
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条