Decision Support Frameworks in Solid Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Sustainability and Social Indicators

被引:3
|
作者
Gutierrez-Lopez, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
McGarvey, Ronald G. [3 ]
Costello, Christine [4 ]
Hall, Damon M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] ESPOL Polytech Univ, Escuela Super Politecn Litoral ESPOL, Fac Ingn Mecan & Ciencias Prod, Campus Gustavo Galindo,Km 30-5 Via Perimetral,POB, Guayaquil, Ecuador
[3] Univ Lille, IESEG Sch Management, CNRS, UMR 9221 LEM Lille Econ Management, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] Penn Univ, Dept Agr & Bioengn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Northeastern Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Urban Affairs, Marine & Environm Sci, Boston, MA 01908 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
multi-criteria decision-making; multi-objective optimization; sustainability criteria; social indicators; literature review; MULTIOBJECTIVE MODEL; RECYCLING NETWORK; CRITERIA; CITIES; IMPLEMENTATION; PARTICIPATION; DETERMINANTS; OPTIMIZATION; FACILITIES; ISTANBUL;
D O I
10.3390/su151813316
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waste management is a critical sector that needs to co-ordinate its activities with outcomes that impact society. Multi-criteria decision-making methods for waste management have been widely considered using environmental and economic criteria. With the development of new social regulations and concerns, sustainable waste management needs to additionally target socially acceptable practices. Despite the need to aid solid waste management decision-makers in contemplating the three pillars of sustainability, a limited inclusion of social impact has been found in the multi-objective decision-making literature. This study presents a systematic literature review of multi-criteria decision-making methods in solid waste management. The purpose of this study is threefold. (1) Emphasize the application of multi-objective decision-making methods, summarizing the models that have been used and their applications; (2) provide insights into the quantification of social aspects and their inclusion in decision-making methods, providing a list of social indicators collected from the reviewed studies; (3) offer an analysis of stakeholders' involvement in waste management. From the articles investigated, one can observe the importance of understanding the local context in which the waste management system is located and the necessity of community consultation to recognize the potential challenges and improvements to solid waste management systems. Consequently, the involvement of stakeholders is crucial during the quantification process of social indicators. In alignment with the findings and needs raised by this review, a methodological approach is suggested for integrating optimization, social aspects, and stakeholders under a waste management context.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to optimise solid waste management
    Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo
    [J]. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022, 37
  • [2] Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review
    Soltani, Atousa
    Hewage, Kasun
    Reza, Bahareh
    Sadiq, Rehan
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 : 318 - 328
  • [3] Material flow analysis as a support tool for multi-criteria analysis in solid waste management decision-making
    Makarichi, Luke
    Techato, Kua-anan
    Jutidamrongphan, Warangkana
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 139 : 351 - 365
  • [4] Corporate sustainability management: a proposed multi-criteria model to support balanced decision-making
    Garcia, Solange
    Cintra, Yara
    Torres, Rita de Cassia S. R.
    Lima, Fabiano Guasti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 136 : 181 - 196
  • [5] A systematic review on MIVES: A sustainability-oriented multi-criteria decision-making method
    Boix-Cots, David
    Pardo-Bosch, Francesc
    Blanco, Ana
    Aguado, Antonio
    Pujadas, Pablo
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 223
  • [6] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management
    Kabir, Golam
    Sadiq, Rehan
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2014, 10 (09) : 1176 - 1210
  • [7] Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Systematic Review
    Azhar, Nayli Adriana
    Radzi, Nurul Asyikin Mohamed
    Ahmad, Wan Siti Halimatul Munirah Wan
    [J]. RECENT ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2021, 14 (08) : 779 - 801
  • [8] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review
    Yuan, Zheng
    Wen, Baohua
    He, Cheng
    Zhou, Jin
    Zhou, Zhonghua
    Xu, Feng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [9] Social Dimensions of Offshore Wind Energy: a Review of Theories and Frameworks of Multi-criteria Decision-Making
    Takeuchi A.
    [J]. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 2023, 10 (04): : 243 - 249
  • [10] THE USE OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA) TO SUPPORT DECISION-MAKING IN HEALTHCARE: AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Gongora, P.
    Obadha, M.
    Rocks, S.
    Fahr, P.
    Rivero-Arias, O.
    Tsiachristas, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S483 - S483