Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Systematic Review

被引:26
|
作者
Azhar, Nayli Adriana [1 ]
Radzi, Nurul Asyikin Mohamed [1 ,2 ]
Ahmad, Wan Siti Halimatul Munirah Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tenaga Nas, Coll Engn, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
[2] Univ Tenaga Nas, Inst Informat & Comp Energy, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
关键词
multi-criteria decision making; industrial decision making; analytical hierarchy process; analytical network process; electre; vikor; topsis; promethee; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; OPTIMAL SITE SELECTION; NETWORK PROCESS; MCDM METHODS; HEALTH-CARE; ELECTRE TRI; AHP; ENERGY; VIKOR; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.2174/2352096514666211029112443
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) helps decision makers (DMs) solve highly complex problems. Accordingly, MCDM has been widely used by DMs from various fields as an effective and reliable tool for solving various problems, such as in site and supplier selection, ranking and assessment. This work presents an in-depth survey of past and recent MCDM techniques cited in the literature. These techniques are mainly categorised into pairwise comparison, outranking and distance-based approaches. Some well-known MCDM methods include the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytical Network Process (ANP), Elimination et Choix Traduisant la Realite (ELECTRE), Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and VIseKrite-rijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). Each of these methods is unique and has been used in a vast field of interest to support DMs in solving complex problems. For a complete survey, discussions related to previous issues and challenges and the current implementation of MCDM are also presented.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 801
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in higher education
    Yuksel, Fatma Seyma
    Kayadelen, Ayse Nilgun
    Antmen, Zahide Figen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 10 (01): : 12 - 28
  • [2] SYSTEMATIC DECISION MAKING: A EXTENDED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL
    Yu, Xiaohan
    Xu, Zeshui
    Hu, Junquan
    Liu, Shousheng
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2017, 23 (01) : 157 - 177
  • [3] A systematic review of multi-criteria decision-making applications in reverse logistics
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. 18TH EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT 2015, 2015, 10 : 766 - 776
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision making approach in E-learning: A systematic review and classification
    Zare, Mojtaba
    Pahl, Christina
    Rahnama, Hamed
    Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh
    Mardani, Abbas
    Ibrahim, Othman
    Ahmadi, Hossein
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 45 : 108 - 128
  • [5] Review on multi-criteria decision analysis in sustainable manufacturing decision making
    Jamwal, Anbesh
    Agrawal, Rajeev
    Sharma, Monica
    Kumar, Vikas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2021, 14 (03) : 202 - 225
  • [6] Multi-criteria decision making with overlapping criteria
    Abdulla, Mohammed Shahid
    [J]. IIMB MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 24 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [7] A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Castillo-Lopez, Elena
    Rodriguez-Hernandez, Jorge
    Canteras-Jordana, Juan Carlos
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 45 : 151 - 162
  • [8] Multi-criteria decision making in ontologies
    Bastinos, Ana Sasa
    Krisper, Marjan
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 222 : 593 - 610
  • [9] A critical review of multi-criteria decision making in protected areas
    de Castro, Monica
    Urios, Vicente
    [J]. ECONOMIA AGRARIA Y RECURSOS NATURALES, 2016, 16 (02): : 89 - 109
  • [10] Pareto multi-criteria decision making
    Grierson, Donald E.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (03) : 371 - 384