Psychometric evaluation of the United States-adapted perceived perioperative competence scale-revised: A national survey

被引:0
|
作者
Maio, Shannon [1 ,7 ]
Stobinski, James X. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gillespie, Brigid M. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Dept Res Methods & Informat Sci, Denver, CO 80210 USA
[2] Natl Inst First Assisting Inc NIFA, Centennial, CO 80111 USA
[3] Nova Southeastern Univ, Ron & Kathy Assaf Coll Nursing, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
[4] Wilkes Univ, Passan Sch Nursing, Wilkes Barre, PA 18766 USA
[5] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Natl Hlth & Med Res Council, Ctr Res Excellence Wiser Wound Care, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia
[6] Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Gold Coast Hlth Nursing & Midwifery Educ & Res Uni, Gold Coast, Qld 4215, Australia
[7] Competency & Credentialing Inst, 400 Inverness Pkwy, Englewood, CO 80112 USA
关键词
Construct validity; Factor structure; Measurement invariance; Multidimensional item response theory; Nursing competence; Operating room nursing; Operating theatre; Reliability; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; OF-FIT INDEXES; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; NURSES; MODEL; VALIDATION; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100173
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Nursing competence is integral to ensuring patient safety, especially in high-risk environments such as the operating room. Instruments which facilitate self-assessment of specialty specific nursing competence allow nurses to gain important insights into their practice to facilitate continuous growth in their professional practice. Currently, there are no psychometrically tested tools to assess perioperative competence applicable to the United States context. Objective: Test the psychometric properties of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised in the United States context. Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was used. Perioperative nurses were recruited via four professional associations and the survey was administered online. Construct validity of the six-dimensional Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised was tested using a multidimensional item response theory model known as the graded response model. Measurement invariance was assessed relative to years of perioperative experience. Internal consistency was estimated using McDonald's Omega and Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients. Results: Responses from a total of 1,581 participants were analyzed in the psychometric analysis. The six-dimensional graded response model of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised displayed satisfactory model fit for the sample (Chi-square(df) = 5,699.09(725); root mean square error of approximation = 0.066, 90% confidence interval: 0.064, 0.067; comparative fit index = 0.955; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.952; standardized root mean squared residual = 0.045). Scalar invariance was established when assessing the psychometric equivalence of the scale across years of perioperative experience (<10 years, >= 10 years) (Chi-square(df) = 5,785.29 (1,573); root mean square error of approximation = 0.058, 90% confidence interval: 0.057, 0.060; comparative fit index = 0.959; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.959). Reliability across the six subscales ranged from alpha = 0.87 - 0.94 and Omega = 0.93 - 0.97. Conclusions: Results suggest that the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale -Revised is suitable to use with perioperative nurses practicing in clinical settings in the United States. Measurement invariance testing indicates the scale is measuring the same construct and is being interpreted in a conceptually similar manner across groups based on years of perioperative experience.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric validation of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised Short Form
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    Harbeck, Emma
    Sutherland-Fraser, Sally
    Nicholson, Patricia
    Boric, Tina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2023, 79 (12) : 4732 - 4746
  • [2] Psychometric Validation of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised in the Swedish Context
    Jaensson, Maria
    Falk-Brynhildsen, Karin
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    Wallentin, Fan Y.
    Nilsson, Ulrica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2018, 33 (04) : 499 - 511
  • [3] Developing a model of competence in the operating theatre: Psychometric validation of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    Polit, Denise F.
    Hamlin, Lois
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2012, 49 (01) : 90 - 101
  • [4] Validity and reliability of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised
    Sonmez, Betul
    Ayoglu, Tuluha
    [J]. NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 21 (04) : 428 - 435
  • [5] Psychometric evaluation of the perceived perioperative competence scale-revised among the Chinese operating room nurses: a methodological research
    Qiaomeng Yu
    Ran Wei
    Yongting Wei
    Xiuhong Wu
    Tao Liang
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 21
  • [6] Psychometric evaluation of the perceived perioperative competence scale-revised among the Chinese operating room nurses: a methodological research
    Yu, Qiaomeng
    Wei, Ran
    Wei, Yongting
    Wu, Xiuhong
    Liang, Tao
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [7] Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Counseling Competencies Scale-Revised
    Xia, Wei
    Li, William Ho Cheung
    Liang, Tingna
    Luo, Yuanhui
    Ho, Laurie Long Kwan
    Cheung, Ankie Tan
    Song, Peige
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [8] Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Version of Control Attitudes Scale-Revised
    Lee, Kyoung Suk
    Park, Da-In
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2023, 38 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [9] Psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised
    Warsini, S.
    Buettner, P.
    Mills, J.
    West, C.
    Usher, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2015, 22 (04) : 251 - 259
  • [10] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nurses Professional Values Scale-Revised
    Weis, Darlene
    Schank, Mary Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2009, 17 (03) : 221 - 231