Deep learning predicts patients outcome and mutations from digitized histology slides in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

被引:4
|
作者
Fu, Yu [1 ]
Karanian, Marie [2 ]
Perret, Raul [3 ]
Camara, Axel [1 ]
Le Loarer, Francois [3 ,4 ]
Jean-Denis, Myriam [2 ]
Hostein, Isabelle [3 ]
Michot, Audrey [5 ]
Ducimetiere, Francoise [2 ]
Giraud, Antoine [6 ]
Courreges, Jean-Baptiste [6 ]
Courtet, Kevin [3 ]
Laizet, Yech'an [3 ]
Bendjebbar, Etienne [1 ]
Du Terrail, Jean Ogier [1 ]
Schmauch, Benoit [1 ]
Maussion, Charles [1 ]
Blay, Jean-Yves [2 ]
Italiano, Antoine [4 ,7 ]
Coindre, Jean-Michel [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Owkin Inc, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Ctr Leon Berard, Canc Res Ctr Lyon, Lyon, France
[3] Inst Bergonie, Dept Biopathol, Bordeaux, France
[4] Univ Bordeaux, Fac Med, Bordeaux, France
[5] Inst Bergonie, Dept Surg Oncol, Bordeaux, France
[6] Inst Bergonie, Clin Res & Clin Epidemiol Unit, Bordeaux, France
[7] Inst Bergonie, Dept Med, Bordeaux, France
关键词
C-KIT; IMATINIB; EFFICACY; MESYLATE; SAFETY; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1038/s41698-023-00421-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Risk assessment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) according to the AFIP/Miettinen classification and mutational profiling are major tools for patient management. However, the AFIP/Miettinen classification depends heavily on mitotic counts, which is laborious and sometimes inconsistent between pathologists. It has also been shown to be imperfect in stratifying patients. Molecular testing is costly and time-consuming, therefore, not systematically performed in all countries. New methods to improve risk and molecular predictions are hence crucial to improve the tailoring of adjuvant therapy. We have built deep learning (DL) models on digitized HES-stained whole slide images (WSI) to predict patients' outcome and mutations. Models were trained with a cohort of 1233 GIST and validated on an independent cohort of 286 GIST. DL models yielded comparable results to the Miettinen classification for relapse-free-survival prediction in localized GIST without adjuvant Imatinib (C-index=0.83 in cross-validation and 0.72 for independent testing). DL splitted Miettinen intermediate risk GIST into high/low-risk groups (p value = 0.002 in the training set and p value = 0.29 in the testing set). DL models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81, 0.91, and 0.71 for predicting mutations in KIT, PDGFRA and wild type, respectively, in cross-validation and 0.76, 0.90, and 0.55 in independent testing. Notably, PDGFRA exon18 D842V mutation, which is resistant to Imatinib, was predicted with an AUC of 0.87 and 0.90 in cross-validation and independent testing, respectively. Additionally, novel histological criteria predictive of patients' outcome and mutations were identified by reviewing the tiles selected by the models. As a proof of concept, our study showed the possibility of implementing DL with digitized WSI and may represent a reproducible way to improve tailoring therapy and precision medicine for patients with GIST.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning predicts patients outcome and mutations from digitized histology slides in gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Yu Fu
    Marie Karanian
    Raul Perret
    Axel Camara
    François Le Loarer
    Myriam Jean-Denis
    Isabelle Hostein
    Audrey Michot
    Françoise Ducimetiere
    Antoine Giraud
    Jean-Baptiste Courreges
    Kevin Courtet
    Yech’an Laizet
    Etienne Bendjebbar
    Jean Ogier Du Terrail
    Benoit Schmauch
    Charles Maussion
    Jean-Yves Blay
    Antoine Italiano
    Jean-Michel Coindre
    npj Precision Oncology, 7
  • [2] Deep learning predicts patients' outcome and mutations from H&E slides in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)
    Italiano, A.
    Fu, Y.
    Karanian, M.
    Perret, R.
    Camara, A.
    Le Loarer, F.
    Jean-Denis, M.
    Hostein, I.
    Michot, A.
    Ducimetiere, F.
    Giraud, A.
    Courreges, J-B.
    Courtet, K.
    Laizet, Y.
    Du Terrail, J. O.
    Schmauch, B.
    Maussion, C.
    Blay, J-Y.
    Coindre, J. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S1225 - S1226
  • [3] Pfetin predicts outcome for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2008, 5 (7): : 364 - 365
  • [4] SLUG transcription factor promotes cell proliferation and predicts outcome of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Sihto, H.
    Pulkka, O. P.
    Nilsson, B.
    Sarlomo-Rikala, M.
    Reichardt, P.
    Eriksson, M.
    Hall, K. Sundby
    Wardelmann, E.
    Vehtari, A.
    Joensuu, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 69 : S73 - S73
  • [5] SVPath: A Deep Learning Tool for Analysis of Stria Vascularis from Histology Slides
    Jain, Aseem
    Perdomo, Dianela
    Nagururu, Nimesh
    Li, Jintong Alice
    Ward, Bryan K.
    Lauer, Amanda M.
    Creighton, Francis X.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 25 (04): : 1 - 8
  • [6] Detection of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in the plasma of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Guhyun Kang
    Byung Noe Bae
    Byeong Seok Sohn
    Jung-Soo Pyo
    Gu Hyum Kang
    Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Targeted Oncology, 2015, 10 : 597 - 601
  • [7] Detection of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in the plasma of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Kang, Guhyun
    Bae, Byung Noe
    Sohn, Byeong Seok
    Pyo, Jung-Soo
    Kang, Gu Hyum
    Kim, Kyoung-Mee
    TARGETED ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (04) : 597 - 601
  • [8] Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Heinrich, MC
    Corless, CL
    Demetri, GD
    Blanke, CD
    von Mehren, M
    Joensuu, H
    McGreevey, LS
    Chen, CJ
    Van den Abbeele, AD
    Druker, BJ
    Kiese, B
    Eisenberg, B
    Roberts, PJ
    Singer, S
    Fletcher, CDM
    Silberman, S
    Dimitrijevic, S
    Fletcher, JA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (23) : 4342 - 4349
  • [9] Spectrum of mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients a population-based study from Slovakia
    Minarik, Gabriel
    Plank, Lukas
    Lasabova, Zora
    Szemes, Tomas
    Burjanivova, Tatiana
    Szepe, Peter
    Buzalkova, Veronika
    Porubsky, David
    Sufliarsky, Jozef
    APMIS, 2013, 121 (06) : 539 - 548
  • [10] Deep learning AI predicts HRD and platinum response from histologic slides
    Bergstrom, Erik N.
    Abbasi, Ammal
    Diaz-Gay, Marcos
    Galland, Loick
    Ladoire, Sylvain
    Lippman, Scott M.
    Alexandrov, Ludmil B.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (07)