Do Audits Improve Future Tax Compliance in the Absence of Penalties? Evidence from Random Audits in Norway

被引:2
|
作者
Hebous, Shafik [1 ]
Jia, Zhiyang [2 ]
Loyland, Knut [4 ]
Thoresen, Thor O. [2 ,3 ]
Ovrum, Arnstein [4 ]
机构
[1] Int Monetary Fund, Washington, DC 20431 USA
[2] Stat Norway, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Econ, Oslo Fiscal Studies, Oslo, Norway
[4] Norwegian Tax Adm, Skien, Norway
关键词
Tax administration; Tax evasion; Tax compliance; Tax audits; Administrative data; EVASION; MISPERCEPTION; UNCERTAINTY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2023.01.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Norwegian Tax Administration conducted multi-year random audits on a specific item in the personal income tax return. We exploit this exceptional randomized setup to es-timate the effects of tax audits on future compliance explicitly distinguishing between dynamic responses of compliant and noncompliant audited taxpayers. A priori, the liter-ature has suggested two competing effects: a post-audit deterrence effect, whereby audits prompt taxpayers to comply in subsequent years, or a "bomb-crater" effect, whereby audits lower taxpayers' subjective perception of the probability of future evasion being detected and hence weaken compliance. Our results show improved future compliance for six post -audit years by those found noncompliant in the audits, despite the absence of penalties. Although the findings are consistent with a deterrence effect, mainly stemming from be-ing caught in wrongdoing rather than being penalized, we argue that there could also be a "learning effect" involved. An important implication of our study is that better information for taxpayers critically should complement tax audits.(c) 2023 International Monetary fund. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 326
页数:22
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] How to Improve Tax Compliance? Evidence from Population-Wide Experiments in Belgium
    De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel
    Imbert, Clement
    Spinnewijn, Johannes
    Tsankova, Teodora
    Luts, Maarten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2021, 129 (05) : 1425 - 1463
  • [32] Digitalization to improve tax compliance: Evidence from VAT e-Invoicing in Peru
    Bellon, Matthieu
    Dabla-Norris, Era
    Khalid, Salma
    Lima, Frederico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2022, 210
  • [33] Do normative appeals affect tax compliance? Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota
    Blumenthal, M
    Christian, C
    Slemrod, J
    [J]. NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2001, 54 (01) : 125 - 136
  • [34] When do consultative referendums improve democracy? Evidence from local referendums in Norway
    Folkestad, Bjarte
    Klausen, Jan Erling
    Saglie, Jo
    Segaard, Signe Bock
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 42 (02) : 213 - 228
  • [35] Can government improve tax compliance by adopting advanced information technology? Evidence from the Golden Tax Project III in China
    Li, Jianjun
    Wang, Xuan
    Wu, Yaping
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 93 : 384 - 397
  • [36] Do code of conduct audits improve chemical safety in garment factories? Lessons on corporate social responsibility in the supply chain from Fair Wear Foundation
    Lindholm, Henrik
    Egels-Zanden, Niklas
    Ruden, Christina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 22 (04) : 283 - 291
  • [37] Does E-Government Improve Government Capacity? Evidence from Tax Compliance Costs, Tax Revenue, and Public Procurement Competitiveness
    Kochanova, Anna
    Hasnain, Zahid
    Larson, Bradley
    [J]. WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 34 (01): : 101 - 120
  • [38] Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment
    Choo, C. Y. Lawrence
    Fonseca, Miguel A.
    Myles, Gareth D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2016, 124 : 102 - 114
  • [39] Do Analysts' Cash Flow Forecasts Encourage Managers to Improve the Firm's Cash Flows? Evidence from Tax Planning
    Ayers, Benjamin C.
    Call, Andrew C.
    Schwab, Casey M.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2018, 35 (02) : 767 - 793