The scope of open peer review in the scholarly publishing ecosystem

被引:0
|
作者
Majumdar, Sandip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gour Banga, Malda, India
关键词
Open peer review; open identities; open reports; artificial intelligence; blockchain; Interplanetary File System; Overlay Peer Review; OPEN ACCESS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.56042/alis.v70i1.68736
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This study explores the selective corpus of existing literature on Open Peer Review (OPR) to understand and map the extent of adoption of OPR in the scholarly communication, the reflection of different aspects of human emotion embedded in the open peer review reports and authors' response as well, the influence of OPR reports on citation status of articles, and application of Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence and similar technologies in improving the operational viability as well as acceptability of OPR among the scholarly community. The study finds the emergence of various OPR adoption policies and levels of adoption together with emerging models of scientific publishing. Clearly, there is a lack of uniform OPR adoption policy. It also highlights the association of different sets of human emotional traits with OPR reports. The experimentation with the possibility of treating preprint servers and open access repositories as a manuscript marketplace for the eventual selection of articles for open peer review and journal publication is noticed. More research on the influence of human behavioural aspects on OPR practice and the application of emergent technologies in OPR would be required before finally settling down on a stable roadmap for OPR.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 21
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Open access and scholarly publishing.
    Gregory, PS
    Parker, R
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 228 : U358 - U358
  • [22] Focus: Scholarly Publishing and Open Access
    van Trier, Gerard
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2009, 17 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [23] Electronic scholarly publishing and open access
    Oppenheim, Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (04) : 577 - 590
  • [24] Open Access Publishing: Scholarly or Predatory?
    Swartz, Martha K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEALTH CARE, 2015, 29 (02) : 121 - 122
  • [25] Open access, a revolution in scholarly publishing
    Solomon, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INTERNAL MEDICINE PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 1 (01):
  • [26] Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: Comment
    Kleebayoon, Amnuay
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    [J]. NEUROINTERVENTION, 2023, 18 (02) : 145 - 146
  • [27] Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review
    Dobusch, Leonhard
    Heimstaedt, Maximilian
    [J]. MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2019, 50 (05) : 607 - 619
  • [28] The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
    Bjork, Bo-Christer
    Solomon, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2013, 7 (04) : 914 - 923
  • [29] Publishing in the ecosystem of open science
    Luz Antunes, Maria
    Sanches, Tatiana
    Lopes, Carlos
    Alonso-Arevalo, Julio
    [J]. CUADERNOS DE DOCUMENTACION MULTIMEDIA, 2020, 31
  • [30] Publishing and Peer Review / Fundamentals of Peer Review
    O'Hara, Corey M.
    Hoffman, Daniel J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2023, 79 : 253 - 253