Ultrasound may safely replace chest radiograph after tube thoracostomy removal in trauma patients

被引:4
|
作者
Miles, M. Victoria P. [1 ]
Favors, Lauren E. [1 ]
Crowder, Elizabeth [2 ]
Behrman, D. Blake [1 ]
Wilson, Andrew W. [3 ]
Harrell, Kevin N. [1 ]
Mejia, Vicente [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee Coll Med Chattanooga, Dept Surg, 979 East Third St, Suite B-401, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 1031, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med Chattanooga, Dept Orthoped Surg, 979 East Third St, Suite B-202, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
关键词
Tube thoracostomy; Ultrasound; Thoracostomy; Pneumothorax; Trauma;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: A chest radiograph (CXR) is routinely obtained in trauma patients following tube thora-costomy (TT) removal to assess for residual pneumothorax (PTX). New literature supports the deference of a radiograph after routine removal procedure. However, many surgeons have hesitated to adopt this practice due to concern for patient welfare and medicolegal implications. Ultrasound (US) is a portable imaging modality which may be performed rapidly, without radiation exposure, and at minimal cost. We hypothesized that transitioning from CXR to US following TT removal in trauma patients would prove safe and provide superior detection of residual PTX.Materials and Methods: A practice management guideline was established calling for the performance of a CXR and bedside US 2 h after TT removal in all adult trauma patients diagnosed with PTX at a level 1 trauma center. Surgical interns completed a 30-minute, US training course utilizing a handheld US device. US findings were interpreted and documented by the surgical interns. CXRs were interpreted by staff radiologists blinded to US findings. Data was retrospectively collected and analyzed.Results: Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Thirteen (15%) post removal PTX were identified on both US and CXR. An additional 11 (12%) PTX were identified on CXR, and 5 (6%) were identified via US, for a total of 29 PTX (33%). One patient required re-intervention; the recurrent PTX was detected by both US and CXR. For all patients, using CXR as the standard, US displayed a sensitivity of 54.2%, specificity of 92.3%, negative predictive value of 84.5%, and positive predictive value of 72.2%. The cost of care for the study cohort may have been reduced over $9,0 0 0 should US alone have been employed.Conclusion: Bedside US may be an acceptable alternative to CXR to assess for recurrent PTX following trauma TT removal.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 55
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ultrasound Investigation of the Fifth Intercostal Space Landmark for Chest Tube Thoracostomy Site Selection in Pediatric Patients
    Ruthford, Mason R.
    Shah, Aalap
    Wolf, Bethany J.
    Kane, Ian D.
    Borg, Keith
    Moake, Matthew M.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2024, 40 (09) : 638 - 643
  • [42] Pre-hospital finger thoracostomy in patients with chest trauma
    Pritchard, Jodie
    Hogg, Kerstin
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (06) : 419 - 419
  • [43] Bronchocutaneous fistula after chest-tube placement: A rare complication of tube thoracostomy
    John, SK
    Jacob, S
    Piskorowski, T
    HEART & LUNG, 2005, 34 (04): : 279 - 281
  • [44] Is routine roentgenography needed after closed tube thoracostomy removal?
    Pacanowski, JP
    Waack, ML
    Daley, BJ
    Hunter, KS
    Clinton, R
    Diamond, DL
    Enderson, BL
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2000, 48 (04): : 684 - 688
  • [45] Small tube thoracostomy (20-22 Fr) in emergent management of chest trauma
    Tanizaki, Shinsuke
    Maeda, Shigenobu
    Sera, Makoto
    Nagai, Hideya
    Hayashi, Minoru
    Azuma, Hiroyuki
    Kano, Ken-ichi
    Watanabe, Hiroki
    Ishida, Hiroshi
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 (09): : 1884 - 1887
  • [46] A thoracostomy tube guideline improves management efficiency in trauma patients
    Adrales, G
    Huynh, T
    Broering, B
    Sing, RF
    Miles, W
    Thomason, MH
    Jacobs, DG
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 52 (02): : 210 - 214
  • [47] Routine chest radiography after thoracostomy tube removal and during postoperative follow-up is not necessary after lung resection
    Heidel, Justin S.
    Miller, James
    Donovan, Eileen
    Handa, Rahul
    Van Haren, Robert
    Salfity, Hai
    Starnes, Sandra L.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 167 (02):
  • [48] The Effect of Acupressure on Anxiety Related to Chest Tube Removal in Patients with Thoracic Trauma
    Dahmardeh, Hanie
    TRAUMA MONTHLY, 2024, 29 (03) : 1100 - 1105
  • [49] Are chest radiographs routinely necessary following thoracostomy tube removal? Analysis of cost effectiveness
    Pacharn, P
    Heller, DN
    Kammen, BF
    Bailey, RA
    Brasch, RC
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 605 - 605
  • [50] Effectiveness and safety of small-bore tube thoracostomy (≤20 Fr) for chest trauma patients: A retrospective observational study
    Maezawa, Toshinori
    Yanai, Machi
    Huh, Ji Young
    Ariyoshi, Koichi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (12): : 2658 - 2660