COVID-19 policies and the arising of debate on twitter

被引:1
|
作者
Gozzo, Simona [1 ]
D'Agata, Rosario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Dept Polit & Social Sci, Catania, Italy
关键词
automatic content analysis; social network; network analysis; pandemic; narratives; MISINFORMATION;
D O I
10.3389/fsoc.2022.1106393
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This study focuses on the analysis of contacts and communications on Twitter concerning pandemic policies. The goal is both show mobilization processes rising from the web and detect main actors, themes, and contents within the European context. Through a mixed method procedure, we tried to identify the main themes and most relevant communities, the main users, the most relevant topics and languages, and the underlined meanings and differences related to languages (as proxies of areas). Monitoring the communication on 3 main topics ("no-mask", "covid-19", "greenpass"), we noticed the weight of the gap between the government's attempts to communicate information motivating measures geared toward managing the crisis and the perceptions of private users. These perceptions spread through the web with such force the more the emotional, ironic, or polemical plane weighs. In this sense, online communication could be considered a tool for understanding the weight of the interaction between the institutional, social, and private dimensions, with effects on the social construction of identities. Digital communication is becoming an element of this process. The paper describes the "reassuring" role played by the digital community in the construction of ontological forms of security resulting from the construction of a shared digital culture. Results show the emergence of digital communities, structured on reference hubs and standing out from the detected phenomenon, prevalence of idioms and even language structures. The relevant role of the emotional (French), ironic (Italian), protest (English) component is confirmed, but also the changing and fluid structure of the debate and the co-presence of many parallel discussion communities.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COVID-19 policies: Remember measles
    Guha-Sapir, Debarati
    de Almeida, Maria Moitinho
    Keita, Mory
    Greenough, Gregg
    Bendavid, Eran
    SCIENCE, 2020, 369 (6501) : 261 - 261
  • [42] COVID-19: Fiscal Policies and Multilateralism
    Dourado, Ana Paula
    INTERTAX, 2020, 48 (6-7): : 552 - 554
  • [43] Reflections arising from the COVID-19 pandemic
    Raurell-Torreda, M.
    Martinez-Estalella, G.
    Frade-Mera, M. J.
    Carrasco Rodriguez-Rey, L. F.
    de San Pio, E. Romero
    ENFERMERIA INTENSIVA, 2020, 31 (02): : 90 - 93
  • [44] CRITIC, DEBATE AND POLARIZATION AROUND COVID-19
    Salazar Martinez, Rafael Angel
    Barrientos-Baez, Almudena
    Caldevilla-Dominguez, David
    ARGUMENTOS DE RAZON TECNICA, 2020, (23): : 151 - 187
  • [45] Tracking the debate on COVID-19 surveillance tools
    Yann Sweeney
    Nature Machine Intelligence, 2020, 2 : 301 - 304
  • [46] Are all voices heard in the COVID-19 debate?
    Benjamens, Stan
    de Meijer, Vincent E.
    Pol, Robert A.
    Haring, Martijn P. D.
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (01) : 859 - 862
  • [47] Tracking the debate on COVID-19 surveillance tools
    Sweeney, Yann
    Edwards, Lilian
    Vayena, Effy
    Dignum, Virginia
    Dignum, Frank
    Murakami-Wood, David
    NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 2 (06) : 301 - 304
  • [48] End of COVID-19 emergencies sparks debate
    Kupferschmidt, Kai
    Wadman, Meredith
    SCIENCE, 2023, 380 (6645) : 566 - 567
  • [49] The COVID-19 and lifestyle nexus: settling the debate
    Doraiswamy, Sathyanarayanan
    Cheema, Sohaila
    Mamtani, Ravinder
    GLOBAL HEALTH PROMOTION, 2022, 29 (01) : 96 - 100
  • [50] Debate on drugs that may aggravate COVID-19
    Giavina-Bianchi, Pedro
    Aun, Marcelo Vivolo
    Agondi, Rosana C. Amara
    Kalil, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2020, 8 (07): : 2452 - 2453