Analysis of Proximity and Risk for Trust Evaluation in Human-Robot Collaboration

被引:3
|
作者
Campagna, Giulio [1 ]
Rehm, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Tech Fac IT & Design, Rendsburggade 14, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
AUTOMATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309470
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the emerging phase of industrialization, Industry 5.0, humans will be working alongside advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robots to improve the manufacturing process. As a result, it is crucial to evaluate trust in the robot from a human perspective in order to provide a safe environment and balance workloads. Relevant trust indicators in the industrial context include proximity between human and robot, as well as risk associated with robot's performance. In this study, a chemical industry scenario was developed, where a robot assists a human in mixing chemicals. An experiment was conducted for analysing how proximity and risk impact the trust level of the participants. According to the results, there was a higher average trust score in the low proximity (i.e. robot not close to the human) and low risk sections compared to the high proximity and high risk sections of the experiment, respectively. Moreover, statistical analysis indicates that risk had a higher impact on trust than proximity. The findings of this study encourage further research in this area since tools such as AI could be used to control the robot's behavior according to the level of trust between the human and the robot.
引用
收藏
页码:2191 / 2196
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Human-robot collaboration: A survey
    Bauer, Andrea
    Wollherr, Dirk
    Buss, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANOID ROBOTICS, 2008, 5 (01) : 47 - 66
  • [32] Human-Robot Collaboration: A Survey
    Chandrasekaran, Balasubramaniyan
    Conrad, James M.
    [J]. IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2015, 2015,
  • [33] Explainability for Human-Robot Collaboration
    Yadollahi, Elmira
    Romeo, Marta
    Dogan, Fethiye Irmak
    Johal, Wafa
    De Graaf, Maartje
    Levy-Tzedek, Shelly
    Leite, Iolanda
    [J]. COMPANION OF THE 2024 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2024 COMPANION, 2024, : 1364 - 1366
  • [34] Trust in human-robot interactions
    Lazanyi, Kornelia
    Hajdu, Beata
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS, 2017, : 216 - 220
  • [35] Expectedness in Human-Robot Collaboration
    Shayganfar, Mahni
    Rich, Charles
    Sidner, Candace L.
    [J]. AAMAS'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS & MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, : 1271 - 1272
  • [36] Safety in human-robot collaboration
    Hofbaur, M.
    Rathmair, M.
    [J]. ELEKTROTECHNIK UND INFORMATIONSTECHNIK, 2019, 136 (07): : 301 - 306
  • [37] Human modeling for human-robot collaboration
    Hiatt, Laura M.
    Narber, Cody
    Bekele, Esube
    Khemlani, Sangeet S.
    Trafton, J. Gregory
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2017, 36 (5-7): : 580 - 596
  • [38] Behavior Analysis for Increasing the Efficiency of Human-Robot Collaboration
    Lin, Hsien-, I
    Wibowo, Fauzy Satrio
    Lathifah, Nurani
    Chen, Wen-Hui
    [J]. MACHINES, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [39] Human-Robot Collaboration: an analysis of worker's performance
    De Simone, Valentina
    Di Pasquale, Valentina
    Giubileo, Valeria
    Miranda, Salvatore
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SMART MANUFACTURING, 2022, 200 : 1540 - 1549
  • [40] Laminator trust in human-robot collaboration for manufacturing fibre-reinforced composites
    Pickard, Laura Rhian
    Elkington, Michael
    [J]. IET COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2024, 6 (04)