Factors impacting the demonstration of relational autonomy in medical decision-making: A meta-synthesis

被引:2
|
作者
Le, Thi Dung [1 ]
Lin, Shih-Chun [2 ]
Huang, Mei-Chih [1 ,3 ]
Fan, Sheng-Yu [1 ]
Kao, Chi-Yin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Tainan Jr Coll Nursing, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Nursing, 1 Univ Rd, Tainan 701, Taiwan
关键词
Adult; medical decision; meta-synthesis; relational autonomy; ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY; OF-LIFE CARE; BREAST-CANCER; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES; FAMILY-MEMBERS; OLDER-ADULTS; END; PATIENT; PERSPECTIVES; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1177/09697330231200570
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Relational autonomy is an alternative concept of autonomy in which an individual is recognized as embedded into society and influenced by relational factors. Social context, including social location, political structure, and social forces, significantly influence an agent to develop and exercise autonomy skills. The relational approach has been applied in clinical practice to identify relational factors impacting patient autonomy and decision-making, yet there is a knowledge gap in how these factors influence the demonstration of relational autonomy in the context of medical decisions of adults. Objective: The present study targeted the existing knowledge of what and how relational factors impact individuals making medical decisions using the theoretical framework of relational autonomy. Methods: A meta-synthesis study was utilized. Four electronic databases, including Embase, OVID Medline, CINAHL, and PubMed, were searched, along with gray literature and reference lists, to identify relevant studies. Results: 23 studies reporting 21 qualitative and two mixed-method studies were reviewed. Four themes emerged from the qualitative findings: (1) supportive relationships facilitate an individual's relational autonomy; (2) obtaining comprehensive information from broader sources helps individuals exercise relational autonomy; (3) undue family pressure impedes the exercising of patient relational autonomy; and (4) healthcare providers' dominant voice hampers the demonstration of relational autonomy. Conclusions: Applying relational autonomy to assist adults in making well-considered decisions is essential. The meta-synthesis suggests establishing a supportive relationship between individuals, healthcare providers, and family. A supportive relationship will allow healthcare providers to make judgments in line with an individual's values and wishes with the aim of promoting relational autonomy. Advance care planning was proposed as the effective solution to obtain a consensus between individuals and their families while respecting an individual's values and preferences. Furthermore, it is considered crucial for healthcare providers to appreciate an individual's values and incorporate their preferences into recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 738
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A relational model of medical knowledge sharing and medical decision-making quality
    Lin, Chinho
    Chang, Shofang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2008, 43 (04) : 320 - 348
  • [22] Palliative care in chronic heart failure: a theoretically guided, qualitative meta-synthesis of decision-making
    Singh, Gursharan K.
    Ivynian, Serra E.
    Ferguson, Caleb
    Davidson, Patricia M.
    Newton, Phillip J.
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2020, 25 (03) : 457 - 467
  • [23] Palliative care in chronic heart failure: a theoretically guided, qualitative meta-synthesis of decision-making
    Gursharan K. Singh
    Serra E. Ivynian
    Caleb Ferguson
    Patricia M. Davidson
    Phillip J. Newton
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2020, 25 : 457 - 467
  • [24] New perspectives on substituted relational autonomy for shared decision-making in critical care
    Nicola Grignoli
    Valentina Di Bernardo
    Roberto Malacrida
    Critical Care, 22
  • [25] New perspectives on substituted relational autonomy for shared decision-making in critical care
    Grignoli, Nicola
    Di Bernardo, Valentina
    Malacrida, Roberto
    CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 22
  • [26] Guardianship and autonomy in decision-making
    Dev, Deepak
    Pinals, Debra A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2008, 36 (03): : 406 - 409
  • [27] DECISION-MAKING AUTONOMY IN NURSING
    DWYER, DJ
    SCHWARTZ, RH
    FOX, ML
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 1992, 22 (02): : 17 - 23
  • [28] Relational Decision-Making Processes
    Song, Daegene
    NEUROQUANTOLOGY, 2017, 15 (03) : 120 - 124
  • [29] Decision-making experiences and the need for decision aids in women considering vaginal birth after cesarean: A qualitative meta-synthesis
    Zhou, Shurong
    Li, Mengyuan
    Jie, Xiang
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024, 51 (01): : 3 - 12
  • [30] Factors Impacting Provider Treatment Decision-Making in Early Glottic Cancer
    Shneyderman, Matthew
    Shen, Sarek
    Tanavde, Ved
    Kut, Carmen
    Kiess, Ana P.
    Naunheim, Matthew R.
    Akst, Lee M.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (08): : 3686 - 3694