Readability of Online Information on the Latarjet Procedure

被引:1
|
作者
Ahmed, Aathir [1 ]
Jassim, Sarmed [2 ]
Karkuri, Ahmed [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Orthopaed, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Sligo Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Sligo, Ireland
关键词
sports surgery; health literacy; readability; latarjet procedure; orthopaedics; BANKART REPAIR; SHOULDER;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.49184
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionA common complication of first-time or recurrent shoulder dislocations is bone loss at the humeral head and glenoid. Recurrent shoulder instability is often a result of bony defects in the glenoid following shoulder dislocations. In the setting of glenoid bone loss, surgical interventions are generally required to restore stability. The Latarjet procedure is a challenging operation and, due to its complexity, may be associated with operative complications. It can be difficult to explain the procedure to patients in a manner that is easily comprehensible, which may lead to confusion or being overwhelmed with information. Hence, it is important that the information available to patients is easily accessible and perceivable to allow for adequate health literacy. Health literacy is defined as the ability to make health decisions in the context of everyday life. MethodsThe search engines Google and Bing were accessed on a single day in the month of July 2023, searching the terms "Latarjet surgery" and "Latarjet procedure." For each term on both search engines, the first three pages were evaluated, resulting in a total of 114 websites for review. Out of these, 25 websites met the inclusion criteria and underwent further in-depth analysis through the online readability software, WEB FX. This software generated a Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and a Reading Grade Level (RGL) for each website. ResultsIn our study, the mean FRES was 50.3 (SD +/- 12.5), categorizing the data as 'fairly difficult to read.' The mean RGL score was 8.12 (SD +/- 2.35), which exceeds the recommended target.ConclusionIn conclusion, the results of this study have demonstrated that the material available on the Internet about the Latarjet procedure is above the recommended readability levels for the majority of the population. Our findings align with similar studies assessing the readability of online patient information. Based on these findings, physicians should provide patients with vetted information to facilitate a better understanding of the procedure, thereby enabling patients to make more informed decisions regarding their health.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality and readability of online information on idiopathic subglottic stenosis
    Heffernan, Austin
    Hu, Amanda
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05): : 1068 - 1076
  • [42] Trabeculectomy: An assessment of the quality and readability of online patient information
    Donnelly, Aaron
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2019, 97
  • [43] A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information
    Fitzsimmons, P. R.
    Michael, B. D.
    Hulley, J. L.
    Scott, G. O.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2010, 40 (04): : 292 - 296
  • [44] QUALITY AND READABILITY OF ONLINE INFORMATION ABOUT URETERAL STENTS
    Mozafarpour, Sarah
    Norris, Briony
    Borin, James
    Eisner, Brian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E924 - E925
  • [45] READABILITY ASSESSMENT OF ONLINE EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION ON PREMATURE EJACULATION
    Lee, J.
    Khurgin, J.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2023, 20
  • [46] Readability of Online Information on Celiac Disease: A Brief Report
    Ethan, Danna
    Meleo-Erwin, Zoe
    Fera, Joseph
    Garcia, Phillip
    Basch, Corey H.
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2020, 24 (02) : 126 - 134
  • [47] Quality and Readability of Online Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cysts
    Oman, Sven P.
    Zaver, Himesh
    Corral, Juan E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S58 - S60
  • [48] Quality and readability of online health information on eosinophilic fasciitis
    Ghatnekar, S.
    Shah, N.
    Kassamali, B.
    Nambudiri, V.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 141 (05) : S53 - S53
  • [49] Revisiting the Readability of Online Patient Information in Interventional Radiology
    Rahmani, George
    O'Sullivan, Gerard J. J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (06) : 809 - 810
  • [50] Revisiting the Readability of Online Patient Information in Interventional Radiology
    George Rahmani
    Gerard J. O’Sullivan
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2023, 46 : 809 - 810