Readability of Online Information on the Latarjet Procedure

被引:1
|
作者
Ahmed, Aathir [1 ]
Jassim, Sarmed [2 ]
Karkuri, Ahmed [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Orthopaed, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Sligo Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Sligo, Ireland
关键词
sports surgery; health literacy; readability; latarjet procedure; orthopaedics; BANKART REPAIR; SHOULDER;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.49184
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionA common complication of first-time or recurrent shoulder dislocations is bone loss at the humeral head and glenoid. Recurrent shoulder instability is often a result of bony defects in the glenoid following shoulder dislocations. In the setting of glenoid bone loss, surgical interventions are generally required to restore stability. The Latarjet procedure is a challenging operation and, due to its complexity, may be associated with operative complications. It can be difficult to explain the procedure to patients in a manner that is easily comprehensible, which may lead to confusion or being overwhelmed with information. Hence, it is important that the information available to patients is easily accessible and perceivable to allow for adequate health literacy. Health literacy is defined as the ability to make health decisions in the context of everyday life. MethodsThe search engines Google and Bing were accessed on a single day in the month of July 2023, searching the terms "Latarjet surgery" and "Latarjet procedure." For each term on both search engines, the first three pages were evaluated, resulting in a total of 114 websites for review. Out of these, 25 websites met the inclusion criteria and underwent further in-depth analysis through the online readability software, WEB FX. This software generated a Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and a Reading Grade Level (RGL) for each website. ResultsIn our study, the mean FRES was 50.3 (SD +/- 12.5), categorizing the data as 'fairly difficult to read.' The mean RGL score was 8.12 (SD +/- 2.35), which exceeds the recommended target.ConclusionIn conclusion, the results of this study have demonstrated that the material available on the Internet about the Latarjet procedure is above the recommended readability levels for the majority of the population. Our findings align with similar studies assessing the readability of online patient information. Based on these findings, physicians should provide patients with vetted information to facilitate a better understanding of the procedure, thereby enabling patients to make more informed decisions regarding their health.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information
    Lim, Sean-Tee J. M.
    Kelly, Martin
    Selvarajah, Logeswaran
    Murray, Michael
    Scanlon, Timothy
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [2] Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information
    Sean-Tee J. M. Lim
    Martin Kelly
    Logeswaran Selvarajah
    Michael Murray
    Timothy Scanlon
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21
  • [3] Readability of online breast cancer information
    Basch, Corey H.
    MacLean, Sarah A.
    Garcia, Phillip
    Basch, Charles E.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03): : 562 - 563
  • [4] A Readability Assessment of Online Stroke Information
    Sharma, Nikhil
    Tridimas, Andreas
    Fitzsimmons, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 23 (06): : 1362 - 1367
  • [5] Readability and content of online pet obesity information
    Chen, Tom T.
    Khosa, Deep K.
    McEwen, Scott A.
    Abood, Sarah K.
    McWhirter, Jennifer E.
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 257 (11): : 1171 - 1180
  • [6] The Readability of online based patient Information in Ophthalmology
    Heim, N.
    Faron, A.
    Fuchs, J.
    Martini, M.
    Reich, R. H.
    Loeffler, K.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2017, 114 (05): : 450 - 456
  • [7] Quality and Readability of Online Information on Cerebral Palsy
    Temel, Mustafa Hueseyin
    Batibay, Sevilay
    Bagcier, Fatih
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2023, 27 (03) : 266 - 281
  • [8] Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information
    Stewart, J. Ryan
    Heit, Michael H.
    Meriwether, Kate V.
    Hobson, Deslyn T.
    Francis, Sean L.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (01): : 29 - 35
  • [9] Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
    Yurdakul, Ozan Volkan
    Kilicoglu, Mehmet Serkan
    Bagcier, Fatih
    ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2021, 65 (01): : 85 - 92
  • [10] Readability Analysis of Online Headache and Migraine Information
    Russo, Antonio
    Lavorgna, Luigi
    Silvestro, Marcello
    Abbadessa, Gianmarco
    Bisecco, Alvino
    Trojsi, Francesca
    Tessitore, Alessandro
    Tedeschi, Gioacchino
    Bonavita, Simona
    HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (07): : 1317 - 1324