Effects of SNAPPS in clinical reasoning teaching: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:1
|
作者
Flores-Cohaila, Javier A. [1 ]
Vizcarra-Jimenez, Sonia F. [2 ]
Bermudez-Pelaez, Milagros F. [3 ]
Vascones-Roman, Fritz Fidel [3 ]
Rivarola-Hidalgo, Marco [4 ]
Taype-Rondan, Alvaro [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cient Sur, Escuela Med, UCSUR Campus Villa 2,Ctra Panamer S 19, Lima 15067, Peru
[2] Univ Privada Tacna, Escuela Med Humana, Fac Ciencias Salud, Tacna, Peru
[3] Cayetano Heredia Pervuvian Univ, Alberto Hurtado Fac Med, Lima, Peru
[4] Univ Privada Tacna, Ctr Estudios & Invest Educ Med & Bioet, Tacna, Peru
[5] Univ San Ignacio Loyola, Unidad Invest Generac & Sintesis Evidencias Salud, Lima, Peru
关键词
SNAPPS; medical education; clinical reasoning; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; FACILITATE;
D O I
10.1515/dx-2023-0149
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Clinical reasoning is crucial in medical practice, yet its teaching faces challenges due to varied clinical experiences, limited time, and absence from competency frameworks. Despite efforts, effective teaching methodologies remain elusive. Strategies like the One Minute Preceptor (OMP) and SNAPPS are proposed as solutions, particularly in workplace settings. SNAPPS, introduced in 2003, offers a structured approach but lacks comprehensive evidence of its effectiveness. Methodological shortcomings hinder discerning its specific effects. Therefore, a systematic review is proposed to evaluate SNAPPS' impact on clinical reasoning teaching. Content We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SNAPPS against other methods. Data selection and extraction were performed in duplicate. Bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated using Cochrane RoB-2 and GRADE approach. Summary We identified five RCTs performed on medical students and residents. Two compared SNAPPS with an active control such as One Minute Preceptor or training with feedback. None reported the effects of SNAPPS in workplace settings (Kirkpatrick Level 3) or patients (Kirkpatrick Level 4). Low to moderate certainty of evidence suggests that SNAPPS increases the total presentation length by increasing discussion length. Low to moderate certainty of evidence may increase the number of differential diagnoses and the expression of uncertainties. Low certainty of evidence suggests that SNAPPS may increase the odds of trainees initiating a management plan and seeking clarification. Outlook Evidence from this systematic review suggests that SNAPPS has some advantages in terms of clinical reasoning, self-directed learning outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, it appears more beneficial when used by residents than medical students. However, future research should explore outcomes outside SNAPPS-related outcomes, such as workplace or patient-related outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 230
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] One-minute preceptor and SNAPPS for clinical reasoning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grunewald, Sabrine Teixeira Ferraz
    Grunewald, Thiago
    Ezequiel, Oscarina S.
    Lucchetti, Alessandra L. G.
    Lucchetti, Giancarlo
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2023, 53 (05) : 680 - 689
  • [2] The Effectiveness of Teaching Clinical Empathy to Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Fragkos, Konstantinos C.
    Crampton, Paul E. S.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2020, 95 (06) : 947 - 957
  • [3] Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Hua, Kevin
    Cummings, Mike
    Bernatik, Miriam
    Brinkhaus, Benno
    Usichenko, Taras
    Dietzel, Joanna
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [4] Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Zou, Zhuo-Lin
    Zheng, Ji-Na
    Chen, Da-Zhi
    Zou, Tian-Tian
    Shi, Ke-Qing
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (09)
  • [5] Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Randomized Controlled Trials in Cytopathology
    AbdullGaffar, Badr
    [J]. ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2012, 56 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [6] injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Daou, Marietou
    Dionne, Joanna C.
    Teng, Jennifer F. T.
    Taran, Shaurya
    Zytaruk, Nicole
    Cook, Deborah
    Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 71
  • [7] Effects of cardamom supplementation on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Shekarchizadeh-Esfahani, Parivash
    Arab, Arman
    Ghaedi, Ehsan
    Hadi, Amir
    Jalili, Cyrus
    [J]. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (03) : 475 - 485
  • [8] Effects of synbiotic consumption on lipid profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Amir Hadi
    Ehsan Ghaedi
    Saman Khalesi
    Makan Pourmasoumi
    Arman Arab
    [J]. European Journal of Nutrition, 2020, 59 : 2857 - 2874
  • [9] Effects of synbiotic consumption on lipid profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Hadi, Amir
    Ghaedi, Ehsan
    Khalesi, Saman
    Pourmasoumi, Makan
    Arab, Arman
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2020, 59 (07) : 2857 - 2874
  • [10] The effects of propolis supplementation on metabolic parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Gheflati, Alireza
    Dehnavi, Zahra
    Yazdi, Aliyeh Ghannadzadeh
    Khorasanchi, Zahra
    Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza
    Ranjbar, Golnaz
    [J]. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF PHYTOMEDICINE, 2021, 11 (06) : 551 - 565