The Effects of Statins on Bone Formation Around Implants Placed in Animal Bones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Pruthi, Gunjan [1 ]
Mahajan, Rhea [1 ]
Gupta, Arpit [2 ]
Patil, Amol N. [3 ]
Paramasivam, Vijayabharathi [1 ,4 ]
Kaundal, Shaweta [5 ]
机构
[1] PGIMER, Oral Hlth Sci Ctr, Prosthodont, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] PGIMER, Oral Hlth Sci Ctr, Publ Hlth Dent, Chandigarh, India
[3] PGIMER, Pharmacol, Chandigarh, India
[4] AIIMS, Prosthodont, Raipur, India
[5] PGIMER, Internal Med, Chandigarh, India
来源
关键词
Statins; Implants; Osteogenesis; Osteoporosis; Osseointegration; Meta-analysis; II FURCATION DEFECTS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; 1.2-PERCENT ATORVASTATIN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; IN-VITRO; SIMVASTATIN; OSSEOINTEGRATION; HYDROXYAPATITE; OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOPOROSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s12663-023-01873-z
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundImplants are preferred for replacement of missing teeth by the clinicians as well as the patients. Lesser alveolar bone density doesn't preclude any individual for choosing this option but warrants for extra caution. Preclinical studies have explored the osteoinductive potential of statins, but results should be analyzed vigorously before implementing them in humans. There is no meta-analysis to document effect of statins on bone formation around implants in osteoporotic animals.Methods and materialPubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched for studies investigating the effect of statins on bone implant contact (BIC %), bone mineral density (BMD %) and bone volume (BV %) around implants at 2, 4 and 12 weeks. Meta-analysis was performed on subgroups with osteoporotic animals which were administered statins through different routes.ResultsQuantitative data from 12 studies showed favorable effect of statins on bone around implants. Positive difference was observed at 4 weeks in BIC (parenteral [SMD = 4.33 (2.89, 5.77); I-2 = 3%)], BMD (local [SMD = 1.33 (0.51, 2.15); I-2 = 0%] and BV (local [SMD = 1.58 (0.76, 2.40); I-2 = 0%]. BIC [SMD = 1.40 (0.89, 1.90); I-2 = 0%] and BV [SMD = 3.91 (2.33, 5.50); I-2 = 43%] were higher in experimental group after 12 weeks of oral administration.ConclusionsStatins can be investigated as potential bone graft materials to increase the predictability of osseointegration especially in osteoporotic individuals. Future research should focus to reproduce homogeneous data and conclusive recommendations which can be applied in clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 286
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido
    Ferro-Alves, Marcio Luiz
    Okamoto, Roberta
    Mendonaca, Marcos Rogerio
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 47 : 8 - 17
  • [22] Osseointegration of zirconia dental implants in animal investigations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pieralli S.
    Kohal R.-J.
    Lopez Hernandez E.
    Doerken S.
    Spies B.C.
    Pieralli, Stefano (stefano.pieralli@charite.de), 2018, Elsevier Inc. (34) : 171 - 182
  • [23] Osseointegration of zirconia dental implants in animal investigations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pieralli, Stefano
    Kohal, Ralf-Joachim
    Hernandez, Emilia Lopez
    Doerken, Sam
    Spies, Benedikt Christopher
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2018, 34 (02) : 171 - 182
  • [24] Number of implants placed for complete-arch fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Polido, Waldemar Daudt
    Aghaloo, Tara
    Emmett, Thomas W.
    Taylor, Thomas D.
    Morton, Dean
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 : 154 - 183
  • [25] Clinical outcomes of implants placed with transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi
    Alimardani, Yasmin
    Azadi, Ali
    Daneshvar, Alireza
    Amid, Reza
    Khaleghi, Armin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 62 (08): : 685 - 703
  • [26] Less marginal bone loss around bone-level implants restored with long abutments: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tajti, Peter
    Solyom, Eleonora
    Vancsa, Szilard
    Matrai, Peter
    Hegyi, Peter
    Varga, Gabor
    Hermann, Peter
    Borbely, Judit
    Sculean, Anton
    Mikulas, Krisztina
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2024, 94 (01) : 627 - 638
  • [27] Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Godoy-Reina, Isabel
    Moreu-Burgos, Gerardo
    Gonzalez-Jaranay, Maximino
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2021, 26 (02): : E226 - E237
  • [28] Outcome Difference between Short and Longer Dental Implants Placed Simultaneously with Alveolar Bone Augmentation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abayov, Pinny
    Sarikov, Rafael
    Nazarenko, Lisa-Marie
    Babich, Oren
    Haimov, Eliezer
    Juodzbalys, Gintaras
    JOMR-JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (02):
  • [29] Marginal Bone Loss around Machined Smooth Neck Implants Compared to Rough Threaded Neck Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Qi
    Yue, Xinxin
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (05): : 401 - 411
  • [30] Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Magele, Astrid
    Schoerg, Philipp
    Stanek, Barbara
    Gradl, Bernhard
    Sprinzl, Georg Mathias
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (09):