Performance of closed-loop systems for intravenous drug administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:7
|
作者
Spataru, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Eiben, Paola [3 ]
Pluddemann, Annette [2 ]
机构
[1] Southampton Gen Hosp, Dept Neurocrit Care, Southampto SO164YO, Hants, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford OX26GG, England
[3] St Bartholomews Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Barts Hlth NHS Trust, London EC1A7BE, England
关键词
Closed-loop system; Automatic drug administration; Drug delivery technology; ANESTHESIA DELIVERY-SYSTEM; VASOPRESSOR AUTOMATED-SYSTEM; TARGET CONTROLLED INFUSION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; ARTERIAL-PRESSURE; MANUAL CONTROL; PROPOFOL; SURGERY; CISATRACURIUM;
D O I
10.1007/s10877-023-01069-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Closed-loop drug delivery systems are autonomous computers able to administer medication in response to changes in physiological parameters (controlled variables). While limited evidence suggested that closed-loop systems can perform better than manual drug administration in certain settings, this technology remains a research tool with an uncertain risk/benefit profile. Our aim was comparing the performance of closed-loop systems with manual intravenous drug administration in adults. We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase from inception until November 2022, without restriction to language. We assessed for inclusion randomised controlled trials comparing closed-loop and manual administration of intravenous drugs in adults, intraoperatively or in the Intensive Care Unit. We identified 32 studies on closed-loop administration of propofol, noradrenaline, phenylephrine, insulin, neuromuscular blockers, and vasodilators. Most studies were at moderate or high risk of bias. The results showed that closed-loop systems reduced the duration of blood pressure outside prespecified targets during noradrenaline (MD 14.9%, 95% CI 9.6-20.2%, I2 = 66.6%) and vasodilators administration (MD 7.4%, 95% CI 5.2-9.7%, I2 = 62.3%). Closed-loop systems also decreased the duration of recovery after propofol (MD 1.3 min, 95% CI 0.4-2.1 min, I2 = 58.6%) and neuromuscular blockers (MD 9.0 min, 95% CI 7.9-10.0 min, I2 = 0%). The certainty of the evidence was low or very low for most outcomes. Automatic technology may be used to improve the hemodynamic profile during noradrenaline and vasodilators administration and reduce the duration of postanaesthetic recovery.Registration: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022336950) on the 7th of June 2022.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 18
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of closed-loop systems for intravenous drug administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Ana Spataru
    Paola Eiben
    Annette Pluddemann
    [J]. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2024, 38 : 5 - 18
  • [2] Clinical Performance and Safety of Closed-Loop Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Brogi, Etrusca
    Cyr, Shantale
    Kazan, Roy
    Giunta, Francesco
    Hemmerling, Thomas M.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 (02): : 446 - 455
  • [3] Haemodynamic stability of closed-loop anaesthesia systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kong, E.
    Nicolaou, N.
    Vizcaychipi, M.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 74 : 63 - 63
  • [4] A Systematic Literature Review & Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Broderick, P.
    Clark, H.
    Monaghan, D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (01) : 122 - 122
  • [5] Closed-Loop Delivery Systems Versus Manually Controlled Administration of Total IV Anesthesia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Pasin, Laura
    Nardelli, Pasquale
    Pintaudi, Margherita
    Greco, Massimiliano
    Zambon, Massimo
    Cabrini, Luca
    Zangrillo, Alberto
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 (02): : 456 - 464
  • [6] Closed-Loop Intravenous Drug Administration Using Photoplethysmography
    Carpenter, George W., III
    Myers, Holly G.
    Sherer, Eric A.
    Evans, Katie A.
    O'Neal, D. Patrick
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL ENGINEERING IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2018, 6
  • [7] Drug-induced orthostatic hypotension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Bhanu, Cini
    Nimmons, Danielle
    Petersen, Irene
    Orlu, Mine
    Davis, Daniel
    Hussain, Hajra
    Magammanage, Sanuri
    Walters, Kate
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (11)
  • [8] Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Johnson, N
    Barlow, D
    Lethaby, A
    Tavender, E
    Curr, L
    Garry, R
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7506): : 1478 - 1481
  • [9] Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibiotics: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Kasiakou, SK
    Sermaides, GJ
    Michalopoulos, A
    Soteriades, ES
    Falagas, ME
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 5 (09): : 581 - 589
  • [10] Bispectral index monitoring of the clinical effects of propofol closed-loop target-controlled infusion Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Danyang
    Song, Zichen
    Zhang, Chunlu
    Chen, Peng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (04)