Absorptive capacity in the adoption of innovations in health: a scoping review

被引:7
|
作者
Godfrey, Christina M. M. [1 ]
Kircher, Colleen [1 ]
Ashoor, Huda M. M. [2 ]
Ross-White, Amanda [1 ]
Glandon, Lisa [3 ]
Wilson, Rosemary [1 ]
McSharry, Jennifer [4 ]
Tricco, Andrea C. C. [2 ]
Zitzelsberger, Louise [5 ]
Kaan, Diana [5 ]
Sears, Kimberley [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Queens Collaborat Hlth Care Qual JBI Ctr Excellenc, Sch Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Unity Hlth Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Hlth Canada, Hlth Lib, Informat Knowledge Management Div, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Natl Univ Sch Ireland, Sch Psychol, Hlth Behav Change Res Grp, Galway, Ireland
[5] Hlth Canada, Off Grants & Contribut, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
absorptive capacity; health care; implementation; knowledge translation; organizational learning; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; ORGANIZATIONS; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.11124/JBIES-21-00436
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:The objective of this scoping review was to explore how absorptive capacity has been conceptualized and measured in studies of innovation adoption in health care organizations. Introduction:Current literature highlights the need to incorporate knowledge translation processes at the organizational and system level to enhance the adoption of new knowledge into practice. Absorptive capacity is a set of routines and processes characterized by knowledge acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and application. A key concept in organizational learning theory, absorptive capacity is thought to be critical to the adoption of new knowledge and innovations in organizations. To understand how absorptive capacity was conceptualized and measured in health care organizations, it was appropriate to conduct a scoping review to answer our research question. Inclusion criteria:This scoping review included published and unpublished primary studies (ie, experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, and qualitative study designs), as well as reviews that broadly focused on the adoption of innovations at the organizational level in health care, and framed innovation adoption as processes that rely on organizational learning and absorptive or learning capacity. Methods:Searches included electronic databases (ie, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus) and gray literature, as well as reference scanning of relevant studies. Study abstracts and full texts were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Data extraction of relevant studies was also done independently by two reviewers. All discrepancies were addressed through discussion or adjudicated by a third reviewer. Synthesis of the extracted data focused on descriptive frequencies and counts of the results. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Results:The search strategies identified a total of 7433 citations. Sixteen papers were identified for inclusion, including a set of two companion papers, and data were extracted from 15 studies. We synthesized the objectives of the included studies and identified that researchers focused on at least one of the following aspects: i) exploring pre-existing capacity that affects improvement and innovation in health care settings; ii) describing factors influencing the spread and sustainability of organizations; iii) identifying measures and testing the knowledge application process; and iv) providing construct clarity. No new definitions were identified within this review; instead existing definitions were refined to suit the local context of the health care organization in which they were used. Conclusions:Given the rapidly changing and evolving nature of health care, it is important to understand both current best practices and an organization's ability to acquire, assimilate, transform, and apply these practices to their specific organization. While much research has gone into developing ways to implement knowledge translation, understanding an organization's internal structures and framework for seeking out and implementing new evidence as it relates to absorptive capacity is still a relatively novel concept.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 32
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The use of artificial intelligence-based innovations in the health sector in Tanzania: A scoping review
    Sukums, Felix
    Mzurikwao, Deogratias
    Sabas, Deodatus
    Chaula, Rebecca
    Mbuke, Juliana
    Kabika, Twaha
    Kaswija, John
    Ngowi, Bernard
    Noll, Josef
    Winkler, Andrea S.
    Andersson, Sarah Wamala
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [32] Role of coproduction in the sustainability of innovations in applied health and social care research: a scoping review
    Overton, Charlotte
    Tarrant, Carolyn
    Creese, Jennifer
    Armstrong, Natalie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [33] Individuals' capacity to innovate: a literature review of individual absorptive capacity
    Xiong, Fei
    Li, Sihan
    Zhang, Weiqi
    Xu, Ning
    [J]. INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [34] Factors Influencing Adoption of Innovations: An Integrative Review
    Gao Yongqiang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 984 - 987
  • [35] Characterizing Organizational Health Equity Capacity Assessments for Public Health Organizations: A Scoping Review
    Marcus, Rachel
    Nakra, Nidhi Monga
    Porter, Keshia M. Pollack M.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2024, 139 (01) : 26 - 38
  • [36] Absorptive capacity in startups: A systematic literature review
    Flechas Chaparro, Ximena Alejandra
    Kozesinski, Ricardo
    Camargo Junior, Alceu Salles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION, 2021, 17 (01) : 57 - 95
  • [38] Drivers of Green Innovations: The Impact of Export Intensity, Women Leaders, and Absorptive Capacity
    Jeremy Galbreath
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, 158 : 47 - 61
  • [39] One health adoption within prevention, preparedness and response to health threats: Highlights from a scoping review
    Robbiati, Claudia
    Milano, Alessia
    Declich, Silvia
    Di Domenico, Kevin
    Mancini, Laura
    Pizzarelli, Scilla
    D'Angelo, Franca
    Riccardo, Flavia
    Scavia, Gaia
    Dente, Maria Grazia
    [J]. ONE HEALTH, 2023, 17
  • [40] Identifying facilitators of and barriers to the adoption of dynamic consent in digital health ecosystems: a scoping review
    Ah Ra Lee
    Dongjun Koo
    Il Kon Kim
    Eunjoo Lee
    Hyun Ho Kim
    Sooyoung Yoo
    Jeong-Hyun Kim
    Eun Kyung Choi
    Ho-Young Lee
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 24