Remotely Delivered Cancer Genetic Testing in the Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) Trial A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:20
|
作者
Swisher, Elizabeth M. [1 ,13 ]
Rayes, Nadine [2 ]
Bowen, Deborah [3 ]
Peterson, Christine B. [4 ]
Norquist, Barbara M. [1 ]
Coffin, Tara [3 ]
Gavin, Kathleen [5 ]
Polinsky, Deborah [6 ]
Crase, Jamie [1 ]
Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N. [7 ]
Blank, Stephanie V. [8 ]
Munsell, Mark F. [4 ]
Nebgen, Denise [2 ]
Fleming, Gini F. [9 ]
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. [9 ]
Law, Sherman [10 ]
Zhou, Alicia [10 ]
Levine, Douglas A. [11 ,12 ]
D'Andrea, Alan [6 ]
Lu, Karen H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Bioeth & Humanities, Seattle, WA 98185 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX USA
[5] Minnesota Ovarian Canc Alliance, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[8] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Chicago Med, Sect Hematol & Oncol, Chicago, IL USA
[10] Color Hlth, Burlingame, CA USA
[11] NYU Langone Hlth, Perlmutter Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[12] Merck Res Labs, Rahway, NJ USA
[13] Univ Washington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1959 NE Pacific St, POB 356460, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
IN-PERSON; NONINFERIORITY TRIAL; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FAMILY-HISTORY; TELEPHONE; IMPACT; BREAST; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PERCEPTIONS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3748
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Requiring personalized genetic counselingmay introduce barriers to cancer risk assessment, but it is unknown whether omitting counseling could increase distress. OBJECTIVE To assess whether omitting pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling would increase distress during remote testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) was a 4-arm, randomized noninferiority trial testing the effects of individualized pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling on participant distress 3 and 12 months posttest. Participants were recruited via social and traditional media, and enrollment occurred between April 27, 2017, and September 29, 2020. Participants were women aged 30 years or older, English-speaking, US residents, and had access to the internet and a health care professional. Previous cancer genetic testing or counseling was exclusionary. In the family history cohort, participants had a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In the familial pathogenic variant (PV) cohort, participants reported 1 biological relative with a PV in an actionable cancer susceptibility gene. Data analysis was performed between December 13, 2020, and May 31, 2023. INTERVENTION Participants completed baseline questionnaires, watched an educational video, and were randomized to 1 of 4 arms: the control arm with pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling, or 1 of 3 study arms without pretest and posttest counseling. Genetic counseling was provided by phone appointments and testing was done using home-delivered saliva kits. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas participant distress measured by the Impact of Event Scale 3 months after receiving the results. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing, anxiety, depression, and decisional regret. RESULTS A total of 3839 women (median age, 44 years [range 22-91 years]), most of whom were non-Hispanic White and college educated, were randomized, 3125 in the family history and 714 in the familial PV cohorts. In the primary analysis in the family history cohort, all experimental arms were noninferior for distress at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences in anxiety, depression, or decisional regret at 3 months. The highest completion rates were seen in the 2 arms without pretest counseling. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In the MAGENTA clinical trial, omitting individualized pretest counseling for all participants and posttest counseling for those without PV during remote genetic testing was not inferior with regard to posttest distress, providing an alternative care model for genetic risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1555
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Who seeks genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer's disease? Findings from a multisite, randomized clinical trial
    Roberts, JS
    Barber, M
    Brown, TM
    Cupples, LA
    Farrer, LA
    LaRusse, SA
    Post, SG
    Quaid, KA
    Ravdin, LD
    Relkin, NR
    Sadovnick, AD
    Whitehouse, PJ
    Woodard, JL
    Green, RC
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 6 (04) : 197 - 203
  • [33] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial
    Verpoest, Willem
    Staessen, Catherine
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Goossens, Veerle
    Altarescu, Gheona
    Bonduelle, Maryse
    Devesa, Martha
    Eldar-Geva, Talia
    Gianaroli, Luca
    Griesinger, Georg
    Kakourou, Georgia
    Kokkali, Georgia
    Liebenthron, Jana
    Magli, Maria-Cristina
    Parriego, Monica
    Schmutzler, Andreas G.
    Tobler, Monica
    van der Ven, Katrin
    Geraedts, Joep
    Sermon, Karen
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 (09) : 1767 - 1776
  • [34] How does genetic testing affect anxiety about developing AD? Findings from a randomized clinical trial
    Roberts, S
    Lock, M
    Prest, J
    Barber, M
    Whitehouse, P
    LaRusse, S
    Relkin, N
    Brown, T
    Green, RC
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2004, 25 : S509 - S510
  • [35] A randomized trial of two different genetic counseling interventions for BRCA1/2 genetic testing.
    Garber, J
    Digianni, L
    Rue, M
    Schneider, K
    Shannon, K
    Borstelmann, N
    Kalkbrenner, K
    Scheib, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 97S - 97S
  • [36] Behavioral and psychosocial effects of rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: Design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial
    Wevers, Marijke R.
    Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
    Verhoef, Senno
    Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
    Hahn, Daniela E. E.
    Hogervorst, Frans B. L.
    van der Luijt, Rob B.
    Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    Rutgers, Emiel J. Th
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    BMC CANCER, 2011, 11
  • [37] Behavioral and psychosocial effects of rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: Design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial
    Marijke R Wevers
    Margreet GEM Ausems
    Senno Verhoef
    Eveline MA Bleiker
    Daniela EE Hahn
    Frans BL Hogervorst
    Rob B van der Luijt
    Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
    Richard van Hillegersberg
    Emiel JTh Rutgers
    Neil K Aaronson
    BMC Cancer, 11
  • [38] Computerized Prenatal Genetic Testing Decision-Assisting Tool A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kuppermann, Miriam
    Norton, Mary E.
    Gates, Elena
    Gregorich, Steven E.
    Learman, Lee A.
    Nakagawa, Sanae
    Feldstein, Vickie A.
    Lewis, James
    Washington, A. Eugene
    Nease, Robert F., Jr.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (01): : 53 - 63
  • [40] A randomized controlled trial of a video to improve patient knowledge of genetic testing options in pregnancy
    Mulla, Bethany
    Chang, Olivia H.
    Modest, Anna M.
    Hacker, Michele R.
    Marchand, Karen F.
    O'Brien, Karen E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S161 - S161