Remotely Delivered Cancer Genetic Testing in the Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) Trial A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:20
|
作者
Swisher, Elizabeth M. [1 ,13 ]
Rayes, Nadine [2 ]
Bowen, Deborah [3 ]
Peterson, Christine B. [4 ]
Norquist, Barbara M. [1 ]
Coffin, Tara [3 ]
Gavin, Kathleen [5 ]
Polinsky, Deborah [6 ]
Crase, Jamie [1 ]
Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N. [7 ]
Blank, Stephanie V. [8 ]
Munsell, Mark F. [4 ]
Nebgen, Denise [2 ]
Fleming, Gini F. [9 ]
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. [9 ]
Law, Sherman [10 ]
Zhou, Alicia [10 ]
Levine, Douglas A. [11 ,12 ]
D'Andrea, Alan [6 ]
Lu, Karen H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Bioeth & Humanities, Seattle, WA 98185 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX USA
[5] Minnesota Ovarian Canc Alliance, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[8] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Chicago Med, Sect Hematol & Oncol, Chicago, IL USA
[10] Color Hlth, Burlingame, CA USA
[11] NYU Langone Hlth, Perlmutter Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[12] Merck Res Labs, Rahway, NJ USA
[13] Univ Washington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1959 NE Pacific St, POB 356460, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
IN-PERSON; NONINFERIORITY TRIAL; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FAMILY-HISTORY; TELEPHONE; IMPACT; BREAST; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PERCEPTIONS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3748
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Requiring personalized genetic counselingmay introduce barriers to cancer risk assessment, but it is unknown whether omitting counseling could increase distress. OBJECTIVE To assess whether omitting pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling would increase distress during remote testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) was a 4-arm, randomized noninferiority trial testing the effects of individualized pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling on participant distress 3 and 12 months posttest. Participants were recruited via social and traditional media, and enrollment occurred between April 27, 2017, and September 29, 2020. Participants were women aged 30 years or older, English-speaking, US residents, and had access to the internet and a health care professional. Previous cancer genetic testing or counseling was exclusionary. In the family history cohort, participants had a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In the familial pathogenic variant (PV) cohort, participants reported 1 biological relative with a PV in an actionable cancer susceptibility gene. Data analysis was performed between December 13, 2020, and May 31, 2023. INTERVENTION Participants completed baseline questionnaires, watched an educational video, and were randomized to 1 of 4 arms: the control arm with pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling, or 1 of 3 study arms without pretest and posttest counseling. Genetic counseling was provided by phone appointments and testing was done using home-delivered saliva kits. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas participant distress measured by the Impact of Event Scale 3 months after receiving the results. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing, anxiety, depression, and decisional regret. RESULTS A total of 3839 women (median age, 44 years [range 22-91 years]), most of whom were non-Hispanic White and college educated, were randomized, 3125 in the family history and 714 in the familial PV cohorts. In the primary analysis in the family history cohort, all experimental arms were noninferior for distress at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences in anxiety, depression, or decisional regret at 3 months. The highest completion rates were seen in the 2 arms without pretest counseling. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In the MAGENTA clinical trial, omitting individualized pretest counseling for all participants and posttest counseling for those without PV during remote genetic testing was not inferior with regard to posttest distress, providing an alternative care model for genetic risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1555
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing
    Nadine Rayes
    Deborah J. Bowen
    Tara Coffin
    Denise Nebgen
    Christine Peterson
    Mark F. Munsell
    Kathleen Gavin
    Rebecca Lechner
    Jamie Crase
    Deborah Polinsky
    Iris Romero
    Stephanie V. Blank
    Douglas A. Levine
    Barbara M. Norquist
    Elizabeth M. Swisher
    Karen H. Lu
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [2] MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing
    Rayes, Nadine
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Coffin, Tara
    Nebgen, Denise
    Peterson, Christine
    Munsell, Mark F.
    Gavin, Kathleen
    Lechner, Rebecca
    Crase, Jamie
    Polinsky, Deborah
    Romero, Iris
    Blank, Stephanie V.
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Norquist, Barbara M.
    Swisher, Elizabeth M.
    Lu, Karen H.
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [3] REMOTE GENETIC EDUCATION, RISK ASSESSMENT, AND TESTING (GENERATE) FOR PANCREATIC CANCER: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Rodriguez, Nicolette J.
    Furniss, C. S.
    Yurgelun, Matthew B.
    Ukaegbu, Chinedu
    Constantinou, Pamela E.
    Fortes, Ileana
    Caruso, Alyson
    Schwartz, Alison N.
    Stopfer, Jill E.
    Underhill-Blazey, Meghan
    Kenner, Barbara
    Nelson, Scott H.
    Okumura, Sydney
    Zhou, Alicia Y.
    Coffin, Tara B.
    Uno, Hajime
    Horiguchi, Miki
    Ocean, Allyson J.
    Mcallister, Florencia
    Lowy, Andrew M.
    Klein, Alison
    Madlensky, Lisa
    Petersen, Gloria M.
    Garber, Judy E.
    Lippman, Scott M.
    Goggins, Michael G.
    Maitra, Anirban
    Syngal, Sapna
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S45 - S46
  • [4] A randomized trial of the clinical utility of genetic testing for obesity: Design and implementation considerations
    Wang, Catharine
    Gordon, Erynn S.
    Stack, Catharine B.
    Liu, Ching-Ti
    Norkunas, Tricia
    Wawak, Lisa
    Christman, Michael F.
    Green, Robert C.
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 11 (01) : 102 - 113
  • [5] A randomized clinical trial of genetic testing and personalized risk counselling in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving integrated care -The genetic testing and patient empowerment (GEM) trial
    Ma, Ronald Ching Wan
    Xie, Fangying
    Lim, Cadmon King Poo
    Lau, Eric Siu Him
    Luk, Andrea On Yan
    Ozaki, Risa
    Cheung, Grace Pui Yiu
    Lee, Heung Man
    Ng, Alex Chi Wai
    Li, Heung Wing
    Wong, Carmen Ka Man
    Wong, Samuel Yeung Shan
    So, Wing Yee
    Chan, Juliana Chung Ngor
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 189
  • [6] A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Standardized Video Education on Prenatal Genetic Testing Choices: Uptake of Genetic Testing
    Stortz, Sharon K.
    Mulligan, Sheila
    Snipes, Marie
    Hippman, Catriona
    Shridhar, Nirupama Nini
    Stoll, Katie
    Lutgendorf, Monica A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 40 (03) : 267 - 273
  • [7] Framing Effects on Decision-Making for Diagnostic Genetic Testing: Results from a Randomized Trial
    Dwyer, Andrew A.
    Shen, Hongjie
    Zeng, Ziwei
    Gregas, Matt
    Zhao, Min
    GENES, 2021, 12 (06)
  • [8] How the prospect of a clinical trial impacts decision-making for predictive genetic testing in ALS
    Fontaine, Myriam
    Horowitz, Kayla
    Anoja, Nancy
    Genge, Angela
    Salmon, Kristiana
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION, 2024,
  • [9] A randomized trial of a prenatal genetic testing interactive computerized information aid
    Yee, Lynn M.
    Wolf, Michael
    Mullen, Rebecca
    Bergeron, Ashley R.
    Bailey, Stacy Cooper
    Levine, Robert
    Grobman, William A.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 34 (06) : 552 - 557
  • [10] A randomized controlled trial of genetic testing and cascade screening in familial hypercholesterolemia
    Ajufo, Ezimamaka
    DeGoma, Emil M.
    Raper, Anna
    Yu, Kristen Dilzell
    Cuchel, Marina
    Rader, Daniel J.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (09) : 1697 - 1704