Investigating the Influence of Joint Angles on Rock Mechanical Behavior of Rock Mass Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Numerical Models

被引:2
|
作者
Zhao, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Ye [2 ]
Zhang, Zhe [2 ]
Wang, Wenhai [2 ]
Shu, Jiaming [3 ]
Chen, Yang [4 ]
Ning, Jianguo [2 ]
Jiang, Lishuai [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Min Response & Disaster Prevent & Co, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Energy & Min Engn, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Anke Xingye Technol Co Ltd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Energy Grp Co Ltd, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
jointed rock; uniaxial compression; uniaxial tension; mechanical behavior; CRACKING BEHAVIOR; FAILURE; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.3390/pr11051407
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Numerical testing is an ideal testing method in the research on the mechanical behaviors of jointed rock. However, there are few systematic studies focused on the comparison between the two-dimensional (2D) and the three-dimensional (3D) simulation effects on rock mechanical behaviors, particularly those of jointed rock. In this paper, a particle flow model was established by utilizing PFC2D and PFC3D to represent the rock materials, and the rock (especially jointed rock) mechanical behaviors (uniaxial compressive strength UCS, tensile strength TS, crack initiation stress level K-sigma, and the pattern of crack initiation) between 2D and 3D models were compared and analyzed. As expected, the result shows that the UCS and TS showed an increasing tendency with the increase in the joint angle (beta) for both the 2D and the 3D models, and the strength of the 3D model was less than that of the 2D model under uniaxial compression but was greater than that of the 2D model under uniaxial tension. The crack initiation and K-sigma of the specimens were essentially the same for the 2D and 3D models, and the tensile stresses are more concentrated than the compressive stresses before the failure of the specimen; the uniaxial tensile failure more closely approached abrupt failure than the uniaxial compression failure. The tensile cracks were often initiated at the tips of the joints for both the 2D and 3D models, but they were initiated in the middle of the joints when beta was low (beta = 0 degrees and beta= 15 degrees in both the 2D and 3D models) under uniaxial compression and when beta reached 90 degrees under uniaxial tensile. The test results were validated and further analyzed with mathematical analysis. This study has relative referential value to experiments on jointed rock and to analysis of the instability fractures of engineering rock mass.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental and numerical research of jointed rock mass anisotropy in a three-dimensional stress field
    Verbilo, Pavel
    Karasev, Maxim
    Belyakov, Nikita
    Iovlev, Grigirii
    [J]. RUDARSKO-GEOLOSKO-NAFTNI ZBORNIK, 2022, 37 (02): : 109 - 122
  • [22] Three-dimensional modeling for numerical simulation of arch dam abutment rock mass structures
    Shen Hui
    Luo Xian-qi
    Zheng An-xing
    Bi Jin-feng
    Weng Yong-hong
    [J]. ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2014, 35 (05) : 1455 - 1460
  • [23] Three-dimensional modeling for numerical simulation of arch dam abutment rock mass structures
    [J]. Luo, X.-Q. (luoxianqi@sjtu.edu.cn), 1600, Academia Sinica (35):
  • [24] Sensitivity Analysis of Fracture Geometry Parameters on the Mechanical Behavior of Rock Mass with an Embedded Three-Dimensional Fracture Network
    Wu, Na
    Liang, Zhengzhao
    Tao, Yan
    Ai, Ting
    Li, Guijie
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (18):
  • [25] Three-dimensional numerical modelling of falling rock protection barriers
    Gentilini, Cristina
    Govoni, Laura
    de Miranda, Stefano
    Gottardi, Guido
    Ubertini, Francesco
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2012, 44 : 58 - 72
  • [26] Three-dimensional analysis of a powerhouse cavern in an anisotropic rock mass
    Samadhiya, NK
    Viladkar, MN
    Singh, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2004, 41 (03) : 487 - 488
  • [27] Development of New Three-Dimensional Rock Mass Strength Criteria
    Mohammad Hadi Mehranpour
    Pinnaduwa H. S. W. Kulatilake
    Ma Xingen
    Manchao He
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51 : 3537 - 3561
  • [28] Three-dimensional electromagnetic monitoring of the state and structure of a rock mass
    Khachai, OA
    Vlokh, NP
    Novgorodova, EN
    Khachai, AY
    Khudyakov, SV
    [J]. IZVESTIYA-PHYSICS OF THE SOLID EARTH, 2001, 37 (02) : 166 - 172
  • [29] An exact solution of three-dimensional rock mass strength criterion
    Kumar, Vinay
    Rao, Brijbhan
    Burman, Avijit
    Kumar, Sudeep
    Bardhan, Abidhan
    [J]. MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 9 (01) : 723 - 734
  • [30] Development of New Three-Dimensional Rock Mass Strength Criteria
    Mehranpour, Mohammad Hadi
    Kulatilake, Pinnaduwa H. S. W.
    Ma Xingen
    He, Manchao
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2018, 51 (11) : 3537 - 3561