Machine learning algorithms for diagnosis of hip bone osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study

被引:8
|
作者
Rahim, Fakher [1 ]
Zadeh, Amin Zaki [2 ]
Javanmardi, Pouya [3 ]
Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel [4 ]
Khalafi, Mohammad [5 ]
Arjomandi, Ali [3 ]
Ghofrani, Haniye Alsadat [3 ]
Shirbandi, Kiarash [6 ]
机构
[1] Cihan Univ Sulaimaniya, Dept Anesthesia, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[2] Ahvaz Jondishapour Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Ahvaz, Iran
[3] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Fac Paramed, Dept Radiol Technol, Ahvaz, Iran
[4] ShanghaiTech Univ, Sch Biomed Engn, Shanghai 201210, Peoples R China
[5] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Tabriz, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Res Ctr Mol & Cellular Imaging, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Bone diseases; Metabolic; Osteoporosis; Lower extremity; Hip; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Meta-analysis; MINERAL MEASUREMENTS; DXA; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12938-023-01132-9
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
BackgroundOsteoporosis is a significant health problem in the skeletal system, associated with bone tissue changes and its strength. Machine Learning (ML), on the other hand, has been accompanied by improvements in recent years and has been in the spotlight. This study is designed to investigate the Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) of ML to detect osteoporosis through the hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images.MethodsThe ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched until June 2023 for studies that tested the diagnostic precision of ML model-assisted for predicting an osteoporosis diagnosis.ResultsThe pooled sensitivity of univariate analysis of seven studies was 0.844 (95% CI 0.791 to 0.885, I-2 = 94% for 7 studies). The pooled specificity of univariate analysis was 0.781 (95% CI 0.732 to 0.824, I-2 = 98% for 7 studies). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 18.91 (95% CI 14.22 to 25.14, I-2 = 93% for 7 studies). The pooled mean positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were 3.7 and 0.22, respectively. Also, the summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) of the bivariate model has an AUC of 0.878.ConclusionOsteoporosis can be diagnosed by ML with acceptable accuracy, and hip fracture prediction was improved via training in an Architecture Learning Network (ALN).
引用
下载
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Image Analysis-Based Machine Learning for the Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Chu, Yihang
    Hu, Shipeng
    Li, Zilan
    Yang, Xiao
    Liu, Hui
    Yi, Xianglong
    Qi, Xinwei
    OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA, 2024, 8 (07): : 678 - 687
  • [22] Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Man-Soo
    Kim, Jae-Jung
    Kang, Ki-Ho
    Lee, Jeong-Han
    In, Yong
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (04):
  • [23] The value of machine learning approaches in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yiheng Shi
    Haohan Fan
    Li Li
    Yaqi Hou
    Feifei Qian
    Mengting Zhuang
    Bei Miao
    Sujuan Fei
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 22
  • [24] Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Junjie Liu
    Jiangjie Lei
    Yuhang Ou
    Yilong Zhao
    Xiaofeng Tuo
    Baoming Zhang
    Mingwang Shen
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2023, 23 : 2341 - 2356
  • [25] Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Junjie
    Lei, Jiangjie
    Ou, Yuhang
    Zhao, Yilong
    Tuo, Xiaofeng
    Zhang, Baoming
    Shen, Mingwang
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (06) : 2341 - 2356
  • [26] The value of machine learning approaches in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Yiheng
    Fan, Haohan
    Li, Li
    Hou, Yaqi
    Qian, Feifei
    Zhuang, Mengting
    Miao, Bei
    Fei, Sujuan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [27] Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sugibayashi, Takahiro
    Walston, Shannon L.
    Matsumoto, Toshimasa
    Mitsuyama, Yasuhito
    Miki, Yukio
    Ueda, Daiju
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2023, 32 (168):
  • [28] Osteoporosis and bone fractures in alcoholic liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bang, Chang Seok
    Kim, Hyo Sun
    Park, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Eun Jin
    Suk, Ki Tae
    Kim, Dong Joon
    HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 60 : 430A - 430A
  • [29] COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION AND MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR HOSPITAL READMISSIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Talwar, A.
    Huang, Y.
    Lopez-Olivo, M. A.
    Aparasu, R. R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S182 - S182
  • [30] Performance of machine learning algorithms for glioma segmentation of brain MRI: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Evi J. van Kempen
    Max Post
    Manoj Mannil
    Richard L. Witkam
    Mark ter Laan
    Ajay Patel
    Frederick J. A. Meijer
    Dylan Henssen
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 9638 - 9653