Criteria for evaluation of response to biologics in severe asthma - the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS)

被引:4
|
作者
Milger, Katrin
Korn, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Feder, Claudia [3 ]
Fuge, Jan [4 ]
Muehle, Andreas [5 ]
Schuette, Wolfgang [6 ]
Skowasch, Dirk [7 ]
Timmermann, Hartmut [8 ]
Suhling, Hendrik [9 ]
机构
[1] Inst Klin Forsch, Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, Thoraxklin, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Jena, Klin Innere Med 2, Jena, Germany
[4] Deutsch Zentrum Lungenforsch, Hannover, Germany
[5] Pneumol Facharztzentrum Teuchern, Teuchern, Germany
[6] Krankenhaus Martha Maria Halle Dolau, Klin Innere Med 2, Halle, Germany
[7] Univ Klinikums Bonn, Med Klin & Poliklin Pneumol 2, Herzzentrum, Bonn, Germany
[8] Schwerpunktpraxis Colonnaden, Hamburg, Germany
[9] Hannover Med Sch, Klin Pneumol, Hannover, Germany
来源
PNEUMOLOGIE | 2023年
关键词
severe asthma; biologics; response; criteria; score; switching; schweres Asthma; Biologika; Ansprechen; Kriterien; Score; Umstellung;
D O I
10.1055/a-2102-8128
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The introduction of monoclonal antibodies (biologics) has revolutionized the therapy of severe asthma. Even though there is a response in the majority of patients, the degree of response varies. To date criteria for assessment of response to biologics are not consistently defined. Aim To define criteria for evaluation of response to biologics that are precise, simple and suitable for daily use in order to guide decision-making regarding continuation, switching or stopping of biological therapy. Methods 8 physicians with large experience in this indication, supported by a data-scientist, developed a consensus on criteria to evaluate response to biologics in patients with severe asthma. Result We developed a combined score based on current literature, own experience and practicability. It uses the main criteria exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy and asthma control (asthma control test, ACT). We defined thresholds for "good response", "response" and "insufficient response" rated with a score of "2", "1" and "0" respectively: annual exacerbations ("0 or reduction >= 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reductio < 50 %"), daily OCS dose ("stopping or reduction >= 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reduction < 50 %"), asthma control ("ACT increase >= 6 or >= 3 with result >= 20", "ACT increase 3-5 with result < 20", "ACT increase < 3"). Additional individual criteria like lung function and comorbidities may be important for evaluation of response. We propose 3, 6 and 12 months timepoint for assessment of tolerability and response. Using the combined score, we developed a scheme to guide the decision whether switching the biologic should be considered. Conclusion The Biologic Asthma Response Score (BARS) serves as objective and simple tool to evaluate response to biologic therapy using the three main criteria exacerbations, OCS use and asthma control. A validation of the score was initiated.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Response of sputum periostin to anti-T2 biologics treatment in severe asthma
    Nair, Parameswaran
    Radford, Katherine
    Nunomura, Satoshi
    Mukherjee, Manali
    Izuhara, Kenji
    ALLERGY, 2024, 79 (10) : 2842 - 2844
  • [42] Real-World Response To Anti-Eosinophil Biologics For Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
    Surjancev, Ivana
    Viswanathan, Ravi
    Denlinger, Loren
    Mathur, Sameer
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 149 (02) : AB18 - AB18
  • [43] Upper airway disease diagnosis as a predictive biomarker of therapeutic response to biologics in severe asthma
    Cottin, Sophie
    Doyen, Virginie
    Pilette, Charles
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [44] Criteria to evaluate efficacy of biologics in asthma: a Global Asthma Association survey
    Tiotiu, Angelica
    Bikov, Andras
    Gonzalez-Barcala, Francisco-Javier
    Novakova, Silviya
    Novakova, Plamena
    Chong-Neto, Herberto
    Santus, Pierachille
    Ansotegui, Ignacio
    Ivancevich, Juan Carlos
    Kowal, Krzysztof
    Mihaicuta, Stefan
    Nedeva, Denislava
    Canonica, Gorgio Walter
    Bernstein, Jonathan A.
    Boulet, Louis Philippe
    Braido, Fulvio
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 17 (06) : 507 - 516
  • [45] Severe asthma and eligibility for biologics in a Brazilian cohort
    Marques Mello, Luane
    Viana, Karynna P.
    Moraes dos Santos, Felipe
    Saturnino, Luciana T. M.
    Kormann, Michelle L.
    Lazaridis, Evelyn
    Torreao, Cinthia D.
    Soares, Claudia R.
    Abreu, Gabriela A.
    de Lima, Valmar Biao
    Pinheiro, Gabriela P.
    Lima-Matos, Aline
    Ponte, Eduardo Vieira
    Mohan, Divya
    Riley, John H.
    Cruz, Alvaro A.
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2021, 58 (07) : 958 - 966
  • [46] Biologics for the Treatments of Allergic Conditions Severe Asthma
    Caminati, Marco
    Bagnasco, Diego
    Rosenwasser, Lanny J.
    Vianello, Andrea
    Senna, Gianenrico
    IMMUNOLOGY AND ALLERGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 40 (04) : 549 - 564
  • [47] COVID-19, severe asthma, and biologics
    Garcia-Moguel, Ismael
    Campos, Rocio Diaz
    Charterina, Sergio Alonso
    Rodriguez, Consuelo Fernandez
    Crespo, Jesus Fernandez
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 125 (03) : 357 - 359
  • [48] Frequency and reasons for biologics switching in severe asthma
    Gerstlauer, M.
    Seefeldt, M.
    Buhl, R.
    Hamelmann, E.
    Taube, C.
    Idzko, M.
    Korn, S.
    PNEUMOLOGIE, 2022, 76 : S31 - S31
  • [49] Selection of Biologics in Severe Asthma: A Multifaceted Algorithm
    Davila, I
    Quirce, S.
    Olaguibel, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 29 (04) : 325 - 328
  • [50] Efficacy of biologics for severe asthma on allergic comorbidities
    de Menonville, C. Thibaut
    Barakat, L.
    Laborier, F.
    Le Brun, M.
    Dupin, C.
    Neukirch, C.
    Taille, C.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2024, 41 (09) : 669 - 679