Safety Net Program to Improve Statin Initiation Among Adults With High Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

被引:2
|
作者
Mefford, Matthew T. [1 ,8 ]
Zhou, Matt [1 ]
Zhou, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Derakhshan, Hananeh [1 ]
Harrison, Teresa N. [1 ]
Zia, Mona [1 ]
Kanter, Michael H. [1 ,3 ]
Scott, Ronald D. [4 ]
Imley, Tracy M. [5 ]
Sanders, Mark A. [6 ]
Timmins, Royann [7 ]
Reynolds, Kristi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, Dept Res & Evaluat, Pasadena, CA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson Sch Med, Dept Hlth Syst Sci, Pasadena, CA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson Sch Med, Dept Clin Sci, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, Qual & Clin Anal, Pasadena, CA USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson Sch Med, Pasadena, CA USA
[7] Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, Complete Care Support Programs, Reg SureNet, Pasadena, CA USA
[8] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif, Dept Res & Evaluat, 100 S Los Robles Ave,2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
关键词
FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; PRIMARY NONADHERENCE; PRIMARY PREVENTION; MEDICATIONS; POPULATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite their effectiveness in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease risk, high-intensity statins are underutilized among adults with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >= 190 mg/dL. This study determined whether a safety net program (SureNet) facilitating medication and laboratory test orders improved statin initiation and laboratory test completions after (SureNet period: April 2019-September 2021) and before implementation (pre-SureNet period: January 2016-September 2018).Methods: Kaiser Permanente Southern California members aged 20-60 years with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >= 190 mg/dL and no statin use in previous 2-6 months were included in this retrospective cohort study. Statin orders within 14 days and statin fills, laboratory test completions, and improved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol within 180 days of the high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (pre-SureNet) or outreach (SureNet period) were compared. Analyses were conducted in 2022.Results: Overall, 3,534 and 3,555 adults were eligible for statin initiation during the pre-SureNet and SureNet periods, respectively. Overall, 759 (21.5%) and 976 (27.5%) had a statin approved by their physician during pre-SureNet and SureNet periods, respectively (p<0.001). After multivariable adjustment for demographics and clinical characteristics, adults during the SureNet period had a higher likelihood of receiving a statin order (prevalence ratio=1.36, 95% CI=1.25, 1.48), filling their statin (prevalence ratio=1.32, 95% CI=1.26, 1.38), completing their laboratories (prevalence ratio=1.41, 95% CI=1.26, 1.58), and improving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (prevalence ratio=1.21, 95% CI=1.07, 1.37) than in pre-Surenet period.Conclusions: The SureNet program was able to improve prescription orders, fills, laboratory test completions, and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Optimizing both physician adherence to treatment guidelines; and patient adherence to the program may improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 695
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Statin therapies for elevated lipid levels compared across dose ranges to rosuvastatin: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol results
    Jones, PH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 315A - 316A
  • [32] Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    Arsenault, Benoit J.
    Rana, Jamal S.
    Stroes, Erik S. G.
    Despres, Jean-Pierre
    Shah, Prediman K.
    Kastelein, John J. P.
    Wareham, Nicholas J.
    Boekholdt, S. Matthijs
    Khaw, Kay-Tee
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 55 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [33] Relativism and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    McCarthy, Cian P.
    McEvoy, John W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (22) : 2773 - 2774
  • [34] CYCLOSPORINE, LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN, AND CHOLESTEROL
    DEGROEN, PC
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1988, 63 (10) : 1012 - 1021
  • [35] Low Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Mortality Outcomes in Non-Statin Users
    Sung, Ki-Chul
    Huh, Ji Hye
    Ryu, Seungho
    Lee, Jong-Young
    Scorletti, Eleonora
    Byrne, Christopher D.
    Kim, Jang Young
    Hyun, Dae Sung
    Ko, Sang-Baek
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (10)
  • [36] REPLY: Statin-Induced Low Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level: Is Lower Better?
    Boekholdt, S. Matthijs
    Hovingh, G. Kees
    Waters, David D.
    Grundy, Scott M.
    Kastelein, John J. P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (01) : 109 - 109
  • [37] Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol : high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is associated with incident diabetes in Chinese adults: A retrospective cohort study
    Wei, Limin
    Wei, Meng
    Chen, Lei
    Liang, Shanshan
    Gao, Fanfan
    Cheng, Xin
    Jiang, Hongli
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2021, 12 (01) : 91 - 98
  • [38] Baseline levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) and the AvaII polymorphism of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene influence the response of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to pravastatin treatment
    Lahoz, C
    Peña, R
    Mostaza, JM
    Laguna, F
    García-Iglesias, MF
    Taboada, M
    Pintó, X
    METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2005, 54 (06): : 741 - 747
  • [39] High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Statin Trials
    Kakafika, Anna
    Athyros, Vasilios G.
    Tziomalos, Konstantinos
    Karagiannis, Asterios
    Mikhailidis, Dimitri P.
    CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 15 (22) : 2265 - 2270
  • [40] Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Non-High-Density Lipoprotein, Apolipoprotein, or Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle What Should Clinicians Measure?
    Davidson, Michael H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (25) : 2616 - 2617