Optimal design of microgrids to improve wildfire resilience for vulnerable communities at the wildland-urban interface

被引:10
|
作者
Perera, A. T. D. [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Bingyu [3 ]
Wang, Zhe [4 ,5 ]
Soga, Kenichi [6 ]
Hong, Tianzhen [2 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Andlinger Ctr Energy & Environm, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Bldg Technol & Urban Syst Div, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] TU Wien, Res Ctr Transport Planning & Traff Engn, Vienna, Austria
[4] HKUST Shenzhen Hong Kong Collaborat Innovat Res In, Shenzhen, Futian, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
Wildfire; Resilience; Extreme climate events; Microgrid; Climate change; Optimization; POWER-SUPPLY PROBABILITY; OF-LOAD PROBABILITY; LIFE-CYCLE COST; ELECTRICAL HUBS; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; IDENTIFICATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120744
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Climate change leads to extreme climate events that result in frequent wildfires that cause numerous adverse societal impacts. Public Safety Power Shutoffs, adopted by utilities to minimize the risk of wildfires, pose many challenges to electricity consumers. Microgrids, have been proposed to improve the resilience of energy infra-structure during wildfire events for vulnerable communities. However, a comprehensive techno-economic and environmental assessment of the potential of such energy systems have not been performed. To address this research gap, the present study introduces a modeling framework, consisting of (1) clustering algorithms that identify the communities based on building footprint data, fire hazard severity, and renewable energy potential; (2) a building simulation model to quantify the energy demand; and (3) an energy system optimization model to assist the Microgrid design. A novel optimization tool was introduced to model Microgrids in wildland-urban interface, and subsequently, a comprehensive assessment was performed, focusing on seven localities from California, United States, with different climatic conditions. The study reveals that Microgrids can keep the average levelized energy cost and annual Public Safety Power Shutoffs below $0.3/kilowatt-hour (kWh) and 2%- 3% (of the annual energy demand), respectively. Furthermore, renewable energy penetration levels can be maintained above 60% of the annual energy demand. Therefore, Microgrid may become an attractive solution to reduce the adverse impacts of wildfires and enhance the resilience of energy infrastructure. However, the study reveals that Microgrid cannot completely eliminate the Public Safety Power Shutoffs. The levelized cost and renewable energy generation curtailments (waste of renewable energy) become notably high when attempting to eliminate Public Safety Power Shutoffs completely. A notable reduction in energy storage cost is essential to achieve zero Public Safety Power Shutoffs, and this is expected with the evolution of energy storage technologies. The present study recommends Microgrids for communities affected by wildfires to enhance the resilience of energy infrastructure and protect the health and safety of residents. The modeling framework and optimization tool developed in this study can be used by stakeholders and their consultants to inform design and optimization of Microgrids for investment decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Does Place Attachment Predict Wildfire Mitigation and Preparedness? A Comparison of Wildland-Urban Interface and Rural Communities
    Anton, Charis E.
    Lawrence, Carmen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 57 (01) : 148 - 162
  • [12] Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    Helmers, David P.
    Kramer, H. Anu
    Mockrin, Miranda H.
    Alexandre, Patricia M.
    Bar-Massada, Avi
    Butsic, Van
    Hawbaker, Todd J.
    Martinuzzi, Sebastian
    Syphard, Alexandra D.
    Stewart, Susan I.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (13) : 3314 - 3319
  • [13] Wildfire Risk Assessment in a Typical Mediterranean Wildland-Urban Interface of Greece
    Mitsopoulos, Ioannis
    Mallinis, Giorgos
    Arianoutsou, Margarita
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 55 (04) : 900 - 915
  • [14] From "Wildland-Urban Interface" to "Wildfire Interface Zone" using dynamic fire modelling
    Tolhurst, K. G.
    Duff, T. J.
    Chong, D. M.
    [J]. 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2013), 2013, : 290 - 296
  • [15] The global wildland-urban interface
    Schug, Franz
    Bar-Massada, Avi
    Carlson, Amanda R.
    Cox, Heather
    Hawbaker, Todd J.
    Helmers, David
    Hostert, Patrick
    Kaim, Dominik
    Kasraee, Neda K.
    Martinuzzi, Sebastian
    Mockrin, Miranda H.
    Pfoch, Kira A.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    [J]. NATURE, 2023, 621 (7977) : 94 - +
  • [16] Defining the wildland-urban interface
    Stewart, Susan I.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    Hammer, Roger B.
    Hawbaker, Todd J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2007, 105 (04) : 201 - 207
  • [17] Goals, obstacles and effective strategies of wildfire mitigation programs in the Wildland-Urban interface
    Reams, MA
    Haines, TK
    Renner, CR
    Wascom, MW
    Kingre, H
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 7 (05) : 818 - 826
  • [18] Comparing production function models for wildfire risk analysis in the wildland-urban interface
    Mercer, DE
    Prestemon, JP
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 7 (05) : 782 - 795
  • [19] Assessing wildfire exposure in the Wildland-Urban Interface area of the mountains of central Argentina
    Arganaraz, J. P.
    Radeloff, V. C.
    Bar-Massada, A.
    Gavier-Pizarro, G. I.
    Scavuzzo, C. M.
    Bellis, L. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 196 : 499 - 510
  • [20] Assessing wildfire potential within the wildland-urban interface: A southeastern Ohio example
    Lein, James K.
    Stump, Nicole I.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 29 (01) : 21 - 34