Limitations of phase-sorting based pencil beam scanned 4D proton dose calculations under irregular motion

被引:11
|
作者
Duetschler, A. [1 ,2 ]
Prendi, J. [1 ,3 ]
Safai, S. [1 ]
Weber, D. C. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lomax, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ye [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Ctr Proton Therapy, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Phys, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel, Dept Phys, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Radiat Oncol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2023年 / 68卷 / 01期
关键词
4D dose calculation; motion irregularity; intra-fraction motion; proton therapy; lung tumor; liver tumors; RESPIRATORY MOTION; ORGAN MOTION; LUNG-CANCER; BREATH-HOLD; THERAPY; INTERPLAY; RECONSTRUCTION; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/aca9b6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. 4D dose calculation (4DDC) for pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton therapy is typically based on phase-sorting of individual pencil beams onto phases of a single breathing cycle 4DCT. Understanding the dosimetric limitations and uncertainties of this approach is essential, especially for the realistic treatment scenario with irregular free breathing motion. Approach. For three liver and three lung cancer patient CTs, the deformable multi-cycle motion from 4DMRIs was used to generate six synthetic 4DCT(MRI)s, providing irregular motion (11/15 cycles for liver/lung; tumor amplitudes similar to 4-18 mm). 4DDCs for two-field plans were performed, with the temporal resolution of the pencil beam delivery (4-200 ms) or with 8 phases per breathing cycle (500-1000 ms). For the phase-sorting approach, the tumor center motion was used to determine the phase assignment of each spot. The dose was calculated either using the full free breathing motion or individually repeating each single cycle. Additionally, the use of an irregular surrogate signal prior to 4DDC on a repeated cycle was simulated. The CTV volume with absolute dose differences >5% (V (dosediff>5%)) and differences in CTV V (95%) and D (5%)-D (95%) compared to the free breathing scenario were evaluated. Main results. Compared to 4DDC considering the full free breathing motion with finer spot-wise temporal resolution, 4DDC based on a repeated single 4DCT resulted in V (dosediff>5%) of on average 34%, which resulted in an overestimation of V (95%) up to 24%. However, surrogate based phase-sorting prior to 4DDC on a single cycle 4DCT, reduced the average V (dosediff>5%) to 16% (overestimation V (95%) up to 19%). The 4DDC results were greatly influenced by the choice of reference cycle (V (dosediff>5%) up to 55%) and differences due to temporal resolution were much smaller (V (dosediff>5%) up to 10%). Significance. It is important to properly consider motion irregularity in 4D dosimetric evaluations of PBS proton treatments, as 4DDC based on a single 4DCT can lead to an underestimation of motion effects.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Limitations of phase-sorting based pencil beam 4D proton dose calculation under irregular motion
    Duetschler, A.
    Prendi, J.
    Safai, S.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A. J.
    Zhang, Y.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S420 - S422
  • [2] A motion model-guided 4D dose reconstruction for pencil beam scanned proton therapy
    Duetschler, A.
    Huang, L.
    Fattori, G.
    Meier, G.
    Bula, C.
    Hrbacek, J.
    Safai, S.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A. J.
    Zhang, Ye
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (11):
  • [3] Improving 4D optimized Pencil Beam Scanned proton plan robustness using motion guided dose delivery
    Zhang, Y.
    Vatterodt, N.
    Duetschler, A.
    Safai, S.
    Weber, D.
    Lomax, A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S11 - S13
  • [4] Comprehensive 4D robustness evaluation for pencil beam scanned proton plans
    Ribeiro, Cassia O.
    Meijers, Arturs
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Muijs, Christina T.
    Both, Stefan
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Knopf, Antje
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 136 : 185 - 189
  • [5] Experimental Validation of a Log File-Based Dose Reconstruction and Accumulation for 4D Adaptive Pencil Beam Scanned Proton Therapy
    Meijers, A.
    Both, S.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Knopf, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E753 - E754
  • [6] Experimental Validation of a 4D Dose Calculation for Scanned Proton Beam Therapy
    Krieger, M.
    Klimpki, G.
    Fattori, G.
    Hrbacek, J.
    Oxley, D.
    Safai, S.
    Weber, D.
    Lomax, A.
    Zhang, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3180 - 3180
  • [7] Parameter based 4D dose calculations for proton therapy
    Lebbink, Franciska
    Stocchiero, Silvia
    Fossati, Piero
    Engwall, Erik
    Georg, Dietmar
    Stock, Markus
    Knausl, Barbara
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 27
  • [8] How reliable are deformable image registration methods for scanned proton 4D dose calculations?
    Ribeiro, C. O.
    Knopf, A.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A. J.
    Zhang, Y.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S47 - S47
  • [9] Experimental validation of a 4D dose calculation routine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Pfeiler, Tina
    Baeumer, Christian
    Engwall, Erik
    Geismar, Dirk
    Spaan, Bernhard
    Timmermann, Beate
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2018, 28 (02): : 121 - 133
  • [10] 4D Treatment Dose Reconstruction for Scanned Ion Beam Therapy
    Richter, D.
    Saito, N.
    Chaudhri, N.
    Haertig, M.
    Combs, S.
    Habermehl, D.
    Herfarth, K.
    Jaekel, O.
    Durante, M.
    Bert, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S183 - S183