Managerial compensation and firm performance: The moderating role of managerial ownership and other governance factors

被引:1
|
作者
Adelopo, Ismail [1 ]
Adu-Ameyaw, Emmanuel [1 ]
Cheung, Kwok Yip [2 ]
Bako, Hajara Santali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West England, Fac Business & Law, Dept Accounting Econ & Finance, Bristol, England
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
firm performance; managerial compensation; ownership; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; CEO COMPENSATION; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; AGENCY COSTS; PAY; RISK; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1002/jcaf.22609
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study looks at how executive compensation affects firm value and the extent to which this relationship is sensitive to managerial ownership and corporate governance factors. We use data from UK FTSE 100 firms for the period 2007-2012, generating a total of 578 firm-year observations. Consistent with optimal compensation theory, we find that the managerial compensation -firm value is more sensitive to executives' ownership levels and other corporate governance indicators. Our results remain robust to alternative econometric models. We contribute to the literature on corporate governance and firm value . While the paper builds on the executive bonus compensation literature, it also furthers our understanding on the extent to which managerial ownership, institutional ownership, board size and non-executive ownership matter in the executive bonus compensation-corporate value relationship with specific emphasis on UK FTSE 100 firms. Our second contribution is related to the moderating role of managerial (executive) ownership. We show that as executives residual interests go up, managers become more conscious of the firm's idiosyncratic risk, and hence lessen their aggressive investment and financing strategies culminating in lower firm value.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 46
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Managerial compensation structure and firm performance in Chinese PLCs
    Larry Su
    [J]. Asian Business & Management, 2012, 11 : 171 - 193
  • [22] Managerial ownership dynamics and firm value
    Fahlenbrach, Ruediger
    Stulz, Rene M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 92 (03) : 342 - 361
  • [23] Hedging, managerial ownership and firm value
    Zamzamir, Zaminor
    Haron, Razali
    Othman, Anwar Hasan Abdullah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2021, 28 (04): : 263 - 280
  • [24] Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: A Reexamination Using Productivity Measurement
    Lichtenberg, Frank
    Palia, Darius
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (03): : 1240 - 1240
  • [25] Corporate Governance: Board Size, Managerial Ownership and Operations Performance
    Nadarajan, Santhirasegaran
    Chandren, Sitraselvi
    Bahaudin, Ahmad Yusni
    Elias, Ezanee Mohamed
    Halim, Mohd Kamarul Irwan Abdul
    [J]. ISSC 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT SCIENCE, 2016, 14 : 184 - 188
  • [26] Female presence in corporate governance, firm performance, and the moderating role of family ownership
    Amin, Ali
    Ali, Rizwan
    Rehman, Ramiz Ur
    Naseem, Muhammad Akram
    Ahmad, Muhammad Ishfaq
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 929 - 948
  • [27] Reexamining the managerial ownership effect on firm value
    Benson, Bradley W.
    Davidson, Wallace N., III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2009, 15 (05) : 573 - 586
  • [28] Managerial hedging, equity ownership, and firm value
    Acharya, Viral V.
    Bisin, Alberto
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2009, 40 (01): : 47 - 77
  • [29] Influence of Managerial Ownership and Compensation Structure on Establishment Mode Choice: The Moderating Role of Host Country Political Risk
    Datta, Deepak K.
    Musteen, Martina
    Basuil, Dynah A.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2015, 55 (05) : 593 - 613
  • [30] Influence of Managerial Ownership and Compensation Structure on Establishment Mode Choice: The Moderating Role of Host Country Political Risk
    Deepak K. Datta
    Martina Musteen
    Dynah A. Basuil
    [J]. Management International Review, 2015, 55 : 593 - 613