Geopolitical risk on energy, agriculture, livestock, precious and industrial metals: New from a Markov model

被引:3
|
作者
Abid, Ilyes [1 ]
Dhaoui, Abderrazak [2 ,3 ]
Kaabia, Olfa [4 ]
Tarchella, Salma [5 ]
机构
[1] ISC Paris Business Sch, Paris, France
[2] Univ Sousse, IHEC, LaREMFiQ, Sousse, Tunisia
[3] Ipag Business Sch, IPAG Lab, Paris, France
[4] INSEEC Grande Ecole, OMNES Educ, Paris, France
[5] Univ Sousse, Fac Econ Sci & Management, Sousse 4023, Tunisia
关键词
Commodity prices; Geopolitical risk; Investors' sentiment; CRUDE-OIL; VOLATILITY; TERRORISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103925
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper delineates a novel approach to analyze the dynamic effects of a Geopolitical Risk (GPR) shock on five types of commodities (energy, precious metals, agriculture, industrial metals, and livestock products). Covering a period of 10 years, from 2013 to 2023, we use a Markov-Switching model with two regimes (low and high volatility). The findings indicate that a Markov-Switching model with a t-distribution for the errors is the most suitable to analyze the impact of GPR shocks on commodity markets. All commodities react to a GPR shock but differently. The energy market is the most reactive market and livestock is the less sensitive one. Our results suggest that investors may want to consider the impact of geopolitical risk on different types of commodities before making investment decisions. Market participants should pay attention to changes in the Geopolitical Risk Index during high volatility regimes to better understand the behavior of commodity markets.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Navigating geopolitical crises for energy security: Evaluating optimal subsidy policies via a Markov switching DSGE model
    Chan, Ying Tung
    Punzi, Maria Teresa
    Zhao, Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 349
  • [42] Emulsion liquid membrane as a greener approach for precious metals recovery from industrial wastewater - A short review
    Kahar, Izzat Naim Shamsul
    Othman, Norasikin
    Noah, Norul Fatiha Mohammed
    Sofi, Muhammad Hafizuddin Mohd
    Suliman, Sazmin Sufi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2024, 131 : 29 - 43
  • [43] Geopolitical risk and renewable energy consumption: Evidence from a spatial convergence perspective
    Ren, Xiaohang
    Yang, Wanping
    Jin, Yi
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 131
  • [44] Geopolitical risk and renewable energy stock markets: An insight from multiscale dynamic risk spillover
    Yang, Kun
    Wei, Yu
    Li, Shouwei
    He, Jianmin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [45] Recovery of precious metals from industrial wastewater towards resource recovery and environmental sustainability: A critical review
    Nakhjiri, Ali Taghvaie
    Sanaeepur, Hamidreza
    Amooghin, Abtin Ebadi
    Shirazi, Mohammad Mahdi A.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2022, 527
  • [46] A new approach for the recovery of precious metals from solution and from leachates derived from electronic scrap
    Macaskie, L. E.
    Creamer, N. J.
    Essa, A. M. M.
    Brown, N. L.
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2007, 96 (04) : 631 - 639
  • [47] Exploration of industrial risk contagion characteristics and mechanism under geopolitical events: evidence from China
    Li, Yong
    Niu, Tong
    Wang, Xingyi
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (30) : 3582 - 3599
  • [48] Winner or loser? The bidirectional impact between geopolitical risk and energy transition from the renewable energy perspective
    Liu, Fangying
    Su, Chi Wei
    Qin, Meng
    Lobont, Oana-Ramona
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 283
  • [49] Is the geopolitical risk an incentive or obstacle to renewable energy deployment? Evidence from a panel analysis
    Sweidan, Osama D.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 178 : 377 - 384
  • [50] The impact of geopolitical risk on energy security: Evidence from a GMM panel VAR approach
    Zhang, Bin
    Liu, Zuyao
    Wang, Zhaohua
    Zhang, Shuang
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 86