Impact of a Pharmacist-Conducted Preoperative Beta-Lactam Allergy Assessment on Perioperative Cefazolin Prescribing

被引:0
|
作者
Hitchcock, Allison M. [1 ,5 ]
Kufel, Wesley D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Seabury, Robert W. [1 ,4 ]
Steele, Jeffrey M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] State Univ New York Upstate Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Pharm, Med Ctr Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA USA
[3] Binghamton Univ, Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Pract, Binghamton, NY USA
[4] State Univ New York Upstate Med Univ, Dept Med, Syracuse, NY USA
[5] State Univ New York Upstate Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, 750 East Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
beta-lactam allergy; perioperative antibiotics; orthopedic surgery; preoperative interview; cefazolin; PROPHYLAXIS;
D O I
10.1177/08971900231214581
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Cefazolin is guideline recommended for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. Despite its unique R1 side chain, cefazolin is often avoided in patients with beta-lactam allergy with concern for cross reactivity. Objectives: The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who received cefazolin perioperatively. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients with a beta-lactam allergy clarified following the telephone interview and clinical outcomes including acute kidney injury, surgical site infection, Clostridioides difficile infection, and re-admission at 30 and 90 days. Methods: This single-center, quasi-experimental study evaluated a pilot program in which a pharmacist phoned patients >= 18 years of age with a scheduled orthopedic surgery and a documented beta-lactam allergy to assess their allergy preoperatively. Recommendations to use cefazolin were based on an algorithm. Patients were divided into pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Results: A total of 832 patients were screened for inclusion with 135 and 66 patients included in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts. No significant difference was identified in the primary outcome. In the post-intervention cohort, 62% had a beta-lactam reaction updated in the electronic medical record. Those with a beta-lactam allergy delabeled or made less severe were numerically more likely to receive cefazolin than those with an unchanged reaction or a reaction made more severe (95.2% vs 68% vs 65%). There were no differences in clinical outcomes between groups. Conclusion: A pharmacist-conducted preoperative beta-lactam allergy interview in adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery improved beta-lactam allergy documentation but, did not result in increased utilization of cefazolin.
引用
收藏
页码:1073 / 1081
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Assessment of beta-lactam allergy labels with an electronic medical record in Catalonia: A multicenter study
    Molina, G. J. Molina
    Garnica, D.
    Andres, B.
    Perales, C.
    Jurgens, Y.
    Esteso, O.
    Escobar, C.
    Agusti, A.
    Vendrell, L.
    Gomez, L.
    Rodriguez, D.
    Montane, E.
    Cardona, V.
    ALLERGY, 2023, 78
  • [22] Pharmacy driven assessment of appropriate antibiotic selection in patients with reported beta-lactam allergy
    Holmes, Ashley K.
    Bennett, Nicholas T.
    Berry, Timothy P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2019, 2 (05): : 509 - 514
  • [23] The Impact of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergy in Hospitalized Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Requiring Antibiotics
    Huang, Kuan-Hsiang Gary
    Cluzet, Valerie
    Hamilton, Keith
    Fadugba, Olajumoke
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [24] Impact of an Emergency Department Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on the Rate of Beta-Lactam Allergy Challenge
    Eischens, M. R.
    Wolf, L. M.
    Dumkow, L. E.
    Anderson, A. M.
    Jameson, A. P.
    Brandt, K. L.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (04) : S61 - S61
  • [25] Impact of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergy on Inpatient Outcomes: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
    MacFadden, Derek R.
    LaDelfa, Anthony
    Leen, Jessica
    Gold, Wayne L.
    Daneman, Nick
    Weber, Elizabeth
    Al-Busaidi, Ibrahim
    Petrescu, Dan
    Saltzman, Ilana
    Devlin, Megan
    Andany, Nisha
    Leis, Jerome A.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 63 (07) : 904 - 910
  • [26] Impact of removing the beta-lactam allergy label in patients admitted with the need for the use of antibiotics
    Brinez Giraldo, T.
    Agullo Garcia, A.
    Segura Arazuri, N.
    Pano Pardo, J. R.
    Garces Sotillo, M.
    Colas Sanz, C.
    ALLERGY, 2018, 73 : 209 - 209
  • [27] Pathways to improved antibiotic allergy and antimicrobial stewardship practice: The validation of a beta-lactam antibiotic allergy assessment tool
    Devchand, Misha
    Urbancic, Karen F.
    Khumra, Sharmila
    Douglas, Abby P.
    Smibert, Olivia
    Cohen, Emma
    Sutherland, Michael
    Phillips, Elizabeth J.
    Trubiano, Jason A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2019, 7 (03): : 1063 - 1065
  • [28] The impact of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotocs on general practitioners and patients in a cohort of 154 French patients
    Ben Hayoun, M.
    Bourrier, T.
    Pognonec, C.
    Sanfiorenzo, C.
    Marquette, C. H.
    Leroy, S.
    REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE, 2015, 55 (05): : 333 - 340
  • [29] External validation of beta-lactam antibiotic allergy assessment tools: implications for clinical practice and workforce capacity
    Caughey, Gillian E.
    Shakib, Sepehr
    Inglis, Joshua M.
    Thanh-Thao Le
    Yuson, Carlo L.
    Smith, William B.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2019, 7 (06): : 2094 - 2095
  • [30] Assessment of a new brand of determinants for skin test in a large group of patients with a suspect of beta-lactam allergy
    Matheu, V.
    Perez-Rodriguez, E.
    Gonzalez-Perez, R.
    Poza, P.
    Sanchez-Machin, I.
    de la Torre, F.
    Garcia-Robaina, J.
    ALLERGY, 2007, 62 : 532 - 533