Deep Learning Model Based on Dual-Modal Ultrasound and Molecular Data for Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Huang, Jia-Xin [1 ]
Shi, Jun [2 ]
Ding, Sai-Sai [2 ]
Zhang, Hui-Li [2 ]
Wang, Xue-Yan [1 ]
Lin, Shi-Yang [3 ]
Xu, Yan-Fen [1 ]
Wei, Ming-Jie [1 ]
Liu, Long-Zhong [1 ]
Pei, Xiao-Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Dept Med Ultrasound, Ctr Canc,State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou 510000, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 6, Dept Med Ultrasound, Guangzhou 510000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Chemotherapy; Deep learning; Elasticity imaging techniques; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; GUIDELINES; ACCURACY; THERAPY; SYSTEM; IMAGES; WOMEN; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2023.03.036
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To carry out radiomics analysis/deep convolutional neural network (CNN) based on B-mode ultrasound (BUS) and shear wave elastography (SWE) to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 255 breast cancer patients who received NAC between September 2016 and December 2021 were included. Radiomics models were designed using a support vector machine classifier based on US images obtained before treatment, including BUS and SWE. And CNN models also were developed using ResNet architecture. The final predictive model was developed by combining the dual-modal US and independently associated clinicopathologic characteristics. The predictive performances of the models were assessed with five-fold cross-validation. Results: Pretreatment SWE performed better than BUS in predicting the response to NAC for breast cancer for both the CNN and radiomics models (P < 0.001). The predictive results of the CNN models were significantly better than the radiomics models, with AUCs of 0.72 versus 0.69 for BUS and 0.80 versus 0.77 for SWE, respectively (P = 0.003). The CNN model based on the dual-modal US and molecular data exhibited outstanding performance in predicting NAC response, with an accuracy of 83.60% +/- 2.63%, a sensitivity of 87.76% +/- 6.44%, and a specificity of 77.45% +/- 4.38%. Conclusion: The pretreatment CNN model based on the dual-modal US and molecular data achieved excellent performance for predicting the response to chemotherapy in breast cancer. Therefore, this model has the potential to serve as a non-invasive objective biomarker to predict NAC response and aid clinicians with individual treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:S50 / S61
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy benefit using deep learning from stromal histology in breast cancer
    Li, Fengling
    Yang, Yongquan
    Wei, Yani
    Zhao, Yuanyuan
    Fu, Jing
    Xiao, Xiuli
    Zheng, Zhongxi
    Bu, Hong
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [22] Value of ultrasound in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Lim, H. F.
    Sharma, A.
    Gallagher, C.
    Hall, P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 78 (12) : 912 - 918
  • [23] Multimodal deep learning models for the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Joo, Sunghoon
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Kwon, Soonhwan
    Jeon, Eunjoo
    Jung, Hyungsik
    Kim, Ji-Yeon
    Chung, Myung Jin
    Im, Young-Hyuck
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [24] Multimodal deep learning models for the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Sunghoon Joo
    Eun Sook Ko
    Soonhwan Kwon
    Eunjoo Jeon
    Hyungsik Jung
    Ji-Yeon Kim
    Myung Jin Chung
    Young-Hyuck Im
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [25] Pretreatment DCE-MRI-Based Deep Learning Outperforms Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Peng, Yunsong
    Cheng, Ziliang
    Gong, Chang
    Zheng, Chushan
    Zhang, Xiang
    Wu, Zhuo
    Yang, Yaping
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Zheng, Jian
    Shen, Jun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [26] Monitoring response to neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in all treatment phases using an ultrasound deep learning model
    Zhang, Jingwen
    Deng, Jingwen
    Huang, Jin
    Mei, Liye
    Liao, Ni
    Yao, Feng
    Lei, Cheng
    Sun, Shengrong
    Zhang, Yimin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [27] Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Molecular imaging, systemic biomarkers and the cancer metabolome (Review)
    Chuthapisith, Suebwong
    Eremin, Jennifer M.
    Eremin, Oleg
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2008, 20 (04) : 699 - 703
  • [28] Deep learning nomogram for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer patients
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Zhang, Qiang
    Zhao, Bo
    Shi, Gaofeng
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, : 3780 - 3796
  • [29] A Machine Learning Model for Predicting a Major Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Chen, Yonghe
    Wei, Kaikai
    Liu, Dan
    Xiang, Jun
    Wang, Gang
    Meng, Xiaochun
    Peng, Junsheng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [30] Federated learning for predicting histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    du Terrail, Jean Ogier
    Leopold, Armand
    Joly, Clement
    Beguier, Constance
    Andreux, Mathieu
    Maussion, Charles
    Schmauch, Benoit
    Tramel, Eric W.
    Bendjebbar, Etienne
    Zaslavskiy, Mikhail
    Wainrib, Gilles
    Milder, Maud
    Gervasoni, Julie
    Guerin, Julien
    Durand, Thierry
    Livartowski, Alain
    Moutet, Kelvin
    Gautier, Clement
    Djafar, Inal
    Moisson, Anne-Laure
    Marini, Camille
    Galtier, Mathieu
    Balazard, Felix
    Dubois, Remy
    Moreira, Jeverson
    Simon, Antoine
    Drubay, Damien
    Lacroix-Triki, Magali
    Franchet, Camille
    Bataillon, Guillaume
    Heudel, Pierre-Etienne
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (1) : 135 - 146