Regulating data intermediaries: The impact of the Data Governance Act on the EU's data economy

被引:5
|
作者
Carovano, Gabriele [1 ]
Finck, Michele [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Law & Artificial Intelligence, Geschwister Scholl Pl, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Law & Artificial Intelligence, Geschwister Scholl Pl, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Data governance act; General data protection regulation; Data act; Digital markets act; Data intermediaries; European data economy; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105830
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
As part of the European Commission's broader data strategy, the Data Governance Act ("DGA") introduces a new regulatory regime for data intermediaries, which, inter alia, pursues the objective of increasing the competitiveness of the European data economy by bol-stering trust in data-sharing mechanisms. Against this backdrop, we introduce data intermediaries and critically examine the DGA's related legal regime by testing its underlying as-sumptions and highlighting its intrinsic weaknesses and limitations as part of the broader EU data law puzzle. As a result, the paper brings to the fore certain contradictions between DGA's means and ends. Indeed, due to various questionable assumptions, the DGA imposes requirements that not all data intermediaries can satisfy and entrenches a specific technoorganisational form for data intermediation services that may turn out to be economically non-viable. Consequently, one must wonder whether the DGA's rules on data intermediaries are necessary and proportionate in light of the freedom to conduct a business. We furthermore uncover inconsistencies and loopholes between the DGA, the GDPR, the draft Data Act, and the Digital Markets Act. Overall, while the DGA's underlying efforts are laudable, its precise postulations may hinder the achievement of its underlying objectives due to two main factors. First its own internal limitations and incoherences, and, second, uncertainties and tensions resulting from its interplay with the broader EU data law framework. (c) 2023GabrieleCarovanoandMicheleFinck. PublishedbyElsevierLtd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IP Law and Policy for the Data Economy in the EU
    Leistner, Matthias
    Antoine, Lucie
    [J]. ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01):
  • [22] Data sharing within the construction process legally compliant - Requirements of the Data Governance Act for Common Data Environments
    Weber, B.
    Achenbach, M.
    Niederlander, A.
    [J]. BAUINGENIEUR, 2023, 98 (03): : 76 - 84
  • [23] DATA ALTRUISM WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN DATA GOVERNANCE ACT: A SUCCESS OR ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT?
    Rachut, Sarah
    Maurer, Julian W.
    [J]. REVISTA DE DERECHO COMUNITARIO EUROPEO, 2024, (78): : 183 - 213
  • [24] Navigating the EU data governance labyrinth: A business perspective on data sharing in the financial sector
    Coche, Eugenie
    Kolk, Ans
    Dekker, Martijn
    [J]. INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2024, 13 (01):
  • [25] Data Science Data Governance
    Kroll, Joshua A.
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2018, 16 (06) : 61 - 70
  • [26] Unfair Contractual Terms under the EU Data Act
    Omlor, Sebastian
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF PRIVATE LAW, 2024, 32 (02): : 173 - 192
  • [27] Viscous Open Data: The Roles of Intermediaries in an Open Data Ecosystem
    van Schalkwyk, Francois
    Willmers, Michelle
    McNaughton, Maurice
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 22 : 68 - 83
  • [28] Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy
    Mayer-Schoenberger, Viktor
    [J]. SURVEILLANCE & SOCIETY, 2009, 6 (04) : 418 - 420
  • [29] "Data, data, data" - post-Brexit data governance and its relation to the UK's economic model
    Koenig, Pascal D.
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES, 2024, 45 (02) : 241 - 260
  • [30] Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy
    DeCew, Judith Wagner
    [J]. ETHICS & INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2011, 25 (01) : 92 - 94