Comparing Hospital Length of Stay Risk-Adjustment Models in US Value-Based Physician Payments

被引:2
|
作者
Ghosh, Arnab K. [1 ,3 ]
Ibrahim, Said [2 ]
Lee, Jennifer [1 ]
Shapiro, Martin F. [1 ]
Ancker, Jessica [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, New York, NY USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Med, 525 68thSt, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
disparities; hospital; quality; socioeconomic; value-based; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; ELIXHAUSER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/QMH.0000000000000363
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Backgroung and Objectives:Under the Affordable Care Act, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services created the Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program and its successor, the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, to tie physician payments to quality and cost. The addition of hospital length of stay (LOS) to these value-based physician payment models reflects its increasing importance as a metric of health care cost and efficiency and its association with adverse health outcomes. This study compared the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-endorsed LOS risk-adjustment methodology with a novel methodology that accounts for pre-hospitalization clinical, socioeconomic status (SES), and admission-related factors as influential factors of hospital LOS. Methods:Using the 2014 New York, Florida, and New Jersey State Inpatient Database, we compared the observed-to-expected LOS of 2373102 adult admissions for 742 medical and surgical diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) by 3 models: (a) current risk-adjustment model (CRM), which adjusted for age, sex, number of chronic conditions, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and DRG severity weight, (b) CRM but modeling LOS using a generalized linear model (C-GLM), and (c) novel risk-adjustment model (NRM), which added to the C-GLM covariates for race/ethnicity, SES, discharge destination, weekend admission, and individual intercepts for DRGs instead of severity weights. Results:The NRM disadvantaged physicians for fewer medical and surgical DRGs, compared with both the C-GLM and CRM models (medical DRGs: 0.49% vs 13.17% and 10.89%, respectively; surgical DRGs: 0.30% vs 13.17% and 10.98%, respectively). In subgroup analysis, the NRM reduced the proportion of physician-penalizing DRGs across all racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups, with the highest reduction among Whites, followed by low SES patients, and the lowest reduction among Hispanic patients. Conclusions:After accounting for pre-hospitalization socioeconomic and clinical factors, the adjusted LOS using the NRM was lower than estimates from the current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-endorsed model. The current model may disadvantage physicians serving communities with higher socioeconomic risks.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research on Customer Lifetime Value-Based on the Adjustment of "Beta Factor" about Compensate Risk
    Zhang Lin
    Zheng Jingjing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 CHINA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 617 - 628
  • [32] Does value-based purchasing affect US hospital utilization pattern: A comparative study
    Hamadi, Hanadi
    Spaulding, Aaron
    Haley, D. Rob
    Zhao, Mei
    Tafili, Aurora
    Zakari, Nazik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (02) : 148 - 154
  • [33] Hospital and Physician Group Practice Participation in Prior and Next-Generation Value-Based Payment Programs
    Kang, So-Yeon
    Anderson, Gerard
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (02) : E240392
  • [34] Lognormal-based mixture models for robust fitting of hospital length of stay distributions
    Zhang, Xu
    Barnes, Sean
    Golden, Bruce
    Myers, Miranda
    Smith, Paul
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH FOR HEALTH CARE, 2019, 22
  • [35] Participation in Value-Based Payment Programs and US Acute Care Hospital Population Health Partnerships
    Hearld, Larry R.
    Karabukayeva, Aizhan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 67 (02) : 103 - 119
  • [36] Evaluation of acute myocardial infarction in-hospital mortality using a risk-adjustment model based on Japanese administrative data
    Hayashida, K.
    Imanaka, Y.
    Sekimoto, M.
    Kobuse, H.
    Fukuda, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 35 (05) : 590 - 596
  • [37] Value-Based Payments Likely to Survive Affordable Care Act Repeal Coverage, Patient Protections May Be at Risk
    Kuehn, Bridget M.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 135 (13) : 1271 - 1272
  • [38] Where Are We in the Transition to Value-Based Payments?: Findings from a Study on Health System Physician Compensation Arrangements and Financial Incentives for Performance
    Damberg, C.
    Reid, R.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 55 : 126 - 126
  • [39] Survival analysis and competing risk models of hospital length of stay and discharge destination: The effect of distributional assumptions
    Sá C.
    Dismuke C.E.
    Guimarães P.
    [J]. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2007, 7 (3-4) : 109 - 124
  • [40] Hospital Networks and Value-Based Payment Fertile Ground for Regionalizing High-Risk Surgery
    Chhabra, Karan R.
    Dimick, Justin B.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (13): : 1335 - 1336