Comparing Hospital Length of Stay Risk-Adjustment Models in US Value-Based Physician Payments

被引:2
|
作者
Ghosh, Arnab K. [1 ,3 ]
Ibrahim, Said [2 ]
Lee, Jennifer [1 ]
Shapiro, Martin F. [1 ]
Ancker, Jessica [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, New York, NY USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Med, 525 68thSt, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
disparities; hospital; quality; socioeconomic; value-based; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; ELIXHAUSER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/QMH.0000000000000363
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Backgroung and Objectives:Under the Affordable Care Act, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services created the Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program and its successor, the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, to tie physician payments to quality and cost. The addition of hospital length of stay (LOS) to these value-based physician payment models reflects its increasing importance as a metric of health care cost and efficiency and its association with adverse health outcomes. This study compared the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-endorsed LOS risk-adjustment methodology with a novel methodology that accounts for pre-hospitalization clinical, socioeconomic status (SES), and admission-related factors as influential factors of hospital LOS. Methods:Using the 2014 New York, Florida, and New Jersey State Inpatient Database, we compared the observed-to-expected LOS of 2373102 adult admissions for 742 medical and surgical diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) by 3 models: (a) current risk-adjustment model (CRM), which adjusted for age, sex, number of chronic conditions, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and DRG severity weight, (b) CRM but modeling LOS using a generalized linear model (C-GLM), and (c) novel risk-adjustment model (NRM), which added to the C-GLM covariates for race/ethnicity, SES, discharge destination, weekend admission, and individual intercepts for DRGs instead of severity weights. Results:The NRM disadvantaged physicians for fewer medical and surgical DRGs, compared with both the C-GLM and CRM models (medical DRGs: 0.49% vs 13.17% and 10.89%, respectively; surgical DRGs: 0.30% vs 13.17% and 10.98%, respectively). In subgroup analysis, the NRM reduced the proportion of physician-penalizing DRGs across all racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups, with the highest reduction among Whites, followed by low SES patients, and the lowest reduction among Hispanic patients. Conclusions:After accounting for pre-hospitalization socioeconomic and clinical factors, the adjusted LOS using the NRM was lower than estimates from the current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-endorsed model. The current model may disadvantage physicians serving communities with higher socioeconomic risks.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing alternative risk-adjustment models
    Hendryx, MS
    Teague, GB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES & RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (03): : 247 - 257
  • [2] Comparing alternative risk-adjustment models
    Michael S. Hendryx
    Gregory B. Teague
    [J]. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 2001, 28 : 247 - 257
  • [3] Evaluating parsimonious risk-adjustment models for comparing hospital outcomes with vascular surgery
    Osborne, Nicholas H.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    Dimick, Justin B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 52 (02) : 400 - 405
  • [4] Value-Based Payments and Inaccurate Risk Adjustment-Who Is Harmed?
    Bynum, Julie
    Lewis, Valerie
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (11) : 1507 - 1508
  • [5] Systematic Review of Risk Adjustment Models of Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)
    Lu, Mingshan
    Sajobi, Tolulope
    Lucyk, Kelsey
    Lorenzetti, Diane
    Quan, Hude
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2015, 53 (04) : 355 - 365
  • [6] Risk-adjustment models for in-hospital mortality assessment
    Sarria-Santamera, Antonio
    Palma Ruiz, Matilde
    Sendra Gutierrez, Juan Manuel
    Trujillano Cabello, Javier
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2011, 136 (06): : 271 - 272
  • [7] Deriving a risk-adjustment formula for hospital financing: Integrating the impact of socio-economic status on length of stay
    Perelman, Julian
    Shmueli, Amir
    Closon, Marie-Christine
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (01) : 88 - 98
  • [8] Development and validation of a risk-adjustment model for mortality and hospital length of stay for trauma patients: a prospective registry-based study in Australia
    Earnest, Arul
    Palmer, Cameron
    O'Reilly, Gerard
    Burrell, Maxine
    McKie, Emily
    Rao, Sudhakar
    Curtis, Kate
    Cameron, Peter
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [9] Risk Adjustment Is Necessary in Value-based Outcomes Models for Infected TKA
    Courtney, P. Maxwell
    Boniello, Anthony J.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    Lee, Gwo-Chin
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (10) : 1940 - 1948