Watson for oncology decision system for treatment consistency study in breast cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Yaobang [1 ]
Huo, Xingfa [2 ]
Li, Qi [3 ]
Li, Yishuang [4 ]
Shen, Guoshuang [2 ]
Wang, Miaozhou [2 ]
Ren, Dengfeng [2 ]
Zhao, Fuxing [2 ]
Liu, Zhen [2 ]
Zhao, Jiuda [2 ]
Liu, Xinlan [5 ]
机构
[1] Ningxia Med Univ, Dept Surg Oncol, Gen Hosp, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Univ, Canc Hosp, Affiliated Hosp, Breast Dis Diag & Treatment Ctr, Xining 810000, Peoples R China
[3] Yinchuan Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Oncol, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, Peoples R China
[4] Peoples Hosp Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reg, Dept Clin Nutr, Yinchuan 750002, Ningxia, Peoples R China
[5] Ningxia Med Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Gen Hosp, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, Peoples R China
关键词
Watson for oncology; Artificial intelligence; Breast cancer; Concordance; TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS; LUNG-CANCER; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10238-022-00896-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The Watson for Oncology (WFO) decision system has been rolled out in many cancers. However, the consistency of treatment for breast cancer is still unclear in relatively economically disadvantaged areas. Patients with postoperative adjuvant stage (January 2017 to December 2017) and advanced-stage breast cancer (January 2014 to December 2018) in northwest of China were included in this study. Patient information was imported to make treatment decisions using Watson version 19.20 analysis and subsequently compared with clinician decisions and analyzed for influencing factors. A total of 263 patients with postoperative adjuvant breast cancer and 200 with advanced breast cancer were included in this study. The overall treatment modality for WFO was in 80.2% and 50.5% agreement with clinicians in the adjuvant and advanced-stage population, respectively. In adjuvant treatment after breast cancer surgery, menopausal status (odds ratio (OR) = 2.89, P = 0.012, 95% CI, 1.260-6.630), histological grade (OR = 0.22, P = 0.019, 95% CI, 0.061-0.781) and tumor stage (OR = 0.22, P = 0.042, 95% CI, 0.050-0.943) were independent factors affecting the concordance between the two stages. In the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer, hormone receptor status was a factor influencing the consistency of treatment (chi(2) = 14.728, P < 0.001). There was good agreement between the WFOs and clinicians' treatment decisions in postoperative adjuvant breast cancer, but poor agreement was observed in patients with advanced breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1657
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Watson for oncology decision system for treatment consistency study in breast cancer
    Yaobang Liu
    Xingfa Huo
    Qi Li
    Yishuang Li
    Guoshuang Shen
    Miaozhou Wang
    Dengfeng Ren
    Fuxing Zhao
    Zhen Liu
    Jiuda Zhao
    Xinlan Liu
    [J]. Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2023, 23 : 1649 - 1657
  • [2] Early experience with Watson for Oncology: a clinical decision-support system for prostate cancer treatment recommendations
    Yu, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Myung Soo
    Chung, Ho Seok
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Jung, Seung Il
    Kang, Taek Won
    Kwon, Dongdeuk
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (02) : 407 - 413
  • [3] Early experience with Watson for Oncology: a clinical decision-support system for prostate cancer treatment recommendations
    Seong Hyeon Yu
    Myung Soo Kim
    Ho Seok Chung
    Eu Chang Hwang
    Seung Il Jung
    Taek Won Kang
    Dongdeuk Kwon
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 407 - 413
  • [4] Assessing Concordance With Watson for Oncology, a Cognitive Computing Decision Support System for Colon Cancer Treatment in Korea
    Lee, Won-Suk
    Ahn, Sung Min
    Chung, Jun-Won
    Kim, Kyoung Oh
    Kwon, Kwang An
    Kim, Yoonjae
    Sym, Sunjin
    Shin, Dongbok
    Park, Inkeun
    Lee, Uhn
    Baek, Jeong-Heum
    [J]. JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2018, 2 : 1 - 8
  • [5] EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH WATSON FOR ONCOLOGY, A CLINICAL DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
    Yu, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Myung Soo
    Kim, Tae Hee
    Eun, Seong Jong
    Son, Sumin
    Seo, Young Ho
    Jeong, Se Heon
    Chung, Ho Seok
    Yu, Ho Song
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Kim, Sun-Ouck
    Oh, Kyung Jin
    Jung, Seung Il
    Kang, Taek Won
    Kwon, Dongdeuk
    Park, Kwangsung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E268 - E268
  • [6] Oncology/Breast Cancer System Treatment of Breast Cancer - an Update
    Banys-Paluchowski, Malgorzata
    Krawczyk, Natalia
    Fehm, Tanja
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2016, 76 (05) : 497 - 502
  • [7] Integration of multi-modality treatment planning for early stage breast cancer (BC) into Watson for Oncology, a Decision Support System: Seeing the forest and the trees.
    Seidman, Andrew David
    Pilewskie, Melissa Louise
    Robson, Mark E.
    Kelvin, Joanne Frankel
    Zauderer, Marjorie Glass
    Epstein, Andrew S.
    Kris, Mark G.
    Fu, Julia
    Keesing, Jeffrey
    Caroline, Aryeh
    Megerian, Mark
    Eggebraaten, Thomas
    DeLima, Robert
    Setnes, Marie
    Barker, Kevin
    Gucalp, Ayca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [8] Watson for Oncology and breast cancer treatment recommendations: agreement with an expert multidisciplinary tumor board
    Somashekhar, S. P.
    Sepulveda, M-J.
    Puglielli, S.
    Norden, A. D.
    Shortliffe, E. H.
    Kumar, C. Rohit
    Rauthan, A.
    Kumar, N. Arun
    Patil, P.
    Rhee, K.
    Ramya, Y.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 418 - 423
  • [9] Concordance as evidence in the Watson for Oncology decision-support system
    Aaro Tupasela
    Ezio Di Nucci
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 : 811 - 818
  • [10] A prototype integrated decision support system for breast cancer oncology
    Lisboa, Paulo J. G.
    Jarman, Ian H.
    Etchells, Terence A.
    Ramsey, Phillip
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 4507 : 996 - +