Assessing Concordance With Watson for Oncology, a Cognitive Computing Decision Support System for Colon Cancer Treatment in Korea

被引:36
|
作者
Lee, Won-Suk [1 ]
Ahn, Sung Min [1 ]
Chung, Jun-Won [1 ]
Kim, Kyoung Oh [1 ]
Kwon, Kwang An [1 ]
Kim, Yoonjae [1 ]
Sym, Sunjin [1 ]
Shin, Dongbok [1 ]
Park, Inkeun [1 ]
Lee, Uhn [1 ]
Baek, Jeong-Heum [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Incheon, South Korea
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1200/CCI.17.00109
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) is a clinical decision-support computing system that provides oncologists with evidence-based treatment recommendations for a variety of cancer diagnoses. The evidence-based supported treatment recommendations are presented in three categories: Recommended, representing the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) preferred approach; For Consideration, evidence-based alternative treatments; and Not Recommended, alternative therapies that may be unacceptable. We examined the absolute concordance of treatment options with that of the recommendations of a multidisciplinary team of oncologists from Gachon University, Gil Medical Centre, Incheon, South Korea. Methods We enrolled 656 patients with stage II, III, and IV colon cancer between 2009 and 2016. Cases were processed using WFO and, using retrospective clinical data, outputs were compared with the actual treatment the patient received. Absolute concordance was defined as an alignment of recommendation in the Recommended MSKCC preferred-approach category. Treatment recommendations that were represented in the For Consideration category were not the focus of this study. Results The absolute concordance between the WFO-derived MSKCC preferred approach and Gil Medical Centre treatment recommendations was 48.9%. The percentage of cases found to be acceptable was 65.8% (432 of 656) and the stage-specific concordance rate was 32.5% for patients with stage II disease who had risk factors and 58.8% for patients with stage III disease. Patients 70 years of age and older had a concordance rate of only 20.2%, whereas younger patients had a concordance rate of 63.8% (P = .0001). Conclusion The main reasons attributed to the low concordance rate were age, reimbursement plan, omitting chemotherapy after liver resection, and not recommending biologic agents (ie, cetuximab and bevacizumab). (C) 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concordance as evidence in the Watson for Oncology decision-support system
    Aaro Tupasela
    Ezio Di Nucci
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 : 811 - 818
  • [2] Concordance as evidence in the Watson for Oncology decision-support system
    Tupasela, Aaro
    Di Nucci, Ezio
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (04) : 811 - 818
  • [3] Use of a cognitive computing system for treatment of colon and gastric cancer in South Korea.
    Baek, Jeong-Heum
    Ahn, Sung-Min
    Urman, Alexandra
    Kim, Young Saing
    Ahn, Hee Kyung
    Won, Park Sung
    Lee, Won-Suk
    Sym, Sun Jin
    Park, Heun Kyu
    Chun, Yong-Soon
    Cho, Eun Kyung
    Lee, Woon-Kee
    Shin, Dongbok
    Kim, Young-Bo
    Dankwa-Mullan, Irene
    Norden, Andrew D.
    Rhee, Kyu
    Lee, Uhn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [4] Early experience with Watson for Oncology: a clinical decision-support system for prostate cancer treatment recommendations
    Yu, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Myung Soo
    Chung, Ho Seok
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Jung, Seung Il
    Kang, Taek Won
    Kwon, Dongdeuk
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (02) : 407 - 413
  • [5] Early experience with Watson for Oncology: a clinical decision-support system for prostate cancer treatment recommendations
    Seong Hyeon Yu
    Myung Soo Kim
    Ho Seok Chung
    Eu Chang Hwang
    Seung Il Jung
    Taek Won Kang
    Dongdeuk Kwon
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 407 - 413
  • [6] EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH WATSON FOR ONCOLOGY, A CLINICAL DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
    Yu, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Myung Soo
    Kim, Tae Hee
    Eun, Seong Jong
    Son, Sumin
    Seo, Young Ho
    Jeong, Se Heon
    Chung, Ho Seok
    Yu, Ho Song
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Kim, Sun-Ouck
    Oh, Kyung Jin
    Jung, Seung Il
    Kang, Taek Won
    Kwon, Dongdeuk
    Park, Kwangsung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E268 - E268
  • [7] Watson for oncology decision system for treatment consistency study in breast cancer
    Liu, Yaobang
    Huo, Xingfa
    Li, Qi
    Li, Yishuang
    Shen, Guoshuang
    Wang, Miaozhou
    Ren, Dengfeng
    Zhao, Fuxing
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhao, Jiuda
    Liu, Xinlan
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (05) : 1649 - 1657
  • [8] Watson for oncology decision system for treatment consistency study in breast cancer
    Yaobang Liu
    Xingfa Huo
    Qi Li
    Yishuang Li
    Guoshuang Shen
    Miaozhou Wang
    Dengfeng Ren
    Fuxing Zhao
    Zhen Liu
    Jiuda Zhao
    Xinlan Liu
    [J]. Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2023, 23 : 1649 - 1657
  • [9] Early experience with IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) cognitive computing system for lung and colorectal cancer treatment.
    Somashekhar, S. P.
    Sepulveda, Martin-J.
    Norden, Andrew D.
    Rauthan, Amit
    Arun, Kumar
    Patil, Poonam
    Ethadka, Ramya Y.
    Kumar, Rohit C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [10] Assessing the performance of Watson for oncology, a decision support system, using actual contemporary clinical cases.
    Kris, Mark G.
    Gucalp, Ayca
    Epstein, Andrew S.
    Seidman, Andrew David
    Fu, Julia
    Keesing, Jeffrey
    Caroline, Aryeh
    Megerian, Mark
    Eggebraaten, Thomas
    DeLima, Robert
    Setnes, Marie
    Zauderer, Marjorie Glass
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)