Quantity or quality? Regional innovation policy and green technology innovation

被引:11
|
作者
Zheng, Zhuoji [1 ]
Han, Xianfeng [1 ]
Xiao, Yuanfei [1 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Management & Econ, Kunming 650093, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
National independent innovation demonstration zone (NIIDZ); Green technology innovation; Quantity or quality; Difference-in-difference (DID); INVESTMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-27341-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a typical practice of regional innovation policy, national innovation demonstration zones (NIIDZ) plays an important role in empowering green technology innovation. Analyzing the internal logic between NIIDZ and green technology innovation is of great practical significance to enhance China's independent innovation capability and accelerate the ecological civilization construction. Based on the panel data of 280 cities from 2005 to 2020, we use the difference-in-difference model (DID) to evaluate the policy effect of NIIDZ on green technology innovation from the dual perspective of quality and quantity. The results show that NIIDZ effectively contributes to the quantity of green technology innovation (GTI) and the quality of green technology innovation (GTQ), especially GTI. The conclusion is still valid after robustness tests like PSM-DID and eliminating the pilot interference of innovative cities. The test of the intermediary mechanism shows that regional innovation policy can not only directly drive GTI and GTQ but also indirectly promote them through accelerating talent gather, driving industrial clusters, and increasing government financial support. Spatial heterogeneity analysis indicates that the effectiveness of regional innovation policy demonstrates a decreasing trend from east to west, and this positive effect is more significant in cities with a higher level of financial development. Our results provide important policy insights for the Chinese government to further stimulate the effectiveness of green innovation in the NIIDZ, accelerate the construction of an innovative country, and achieve high-quality green economic development.
引用
收藏
页码:77358 / 77370
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of ESG ratings on the quality and quantity of green innovation of new energy enterprises
    Liu, Haiwen
    Xu, Yuanze
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2024, 12
  • [42] Innovation and Quality Technology
    不详
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 27 (06) : 733 - 734
  • [43] Quantity or quality? The impact of financial geo-density on firms’ green innovation
    Shengrui Li
    Leyi Chen
    Pingguo Xu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 54073 - 54094
  • [44] Linking Technology Foresight and Regional Innovation Activities: Network Facilitating Innovation Policy in Lahti Region, Finland
    Uotila, Tuomo
    Ahlqvist, Toni
    [J]. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2008, 16 (10) : 1423 - 1443
  • [45] Innovation in the Green Economy: An Extension of the Regional Innovation System Model?
    Chapple, Karen
    Kroll, Cynthia
    Lester, T. William
    Montero, Sergio
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2011, 25 (01) : 5 - 25
  • [46] Technology and Innovation for a Green Economy
    Eaton, Derek
    [J]. REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2013, 22 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [47] Patent Protection Policy and Firms' Green Technology Innovation: Mediating Roles of Open Innovation and Human Capital
    Chen, Dong
    Chen, Shi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [48] Regional Big Data Application Capability and Firm Green Technology Innovation
    Cao, Guixiang
    Fang, Xintong
    Chen, Ying
    She, Jinghuai
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [49] Green Finance Innovation and Regional Green Development
    Wang, Yanli
    Zhao, Na
    Lei, Xiaodong
    Long, Ruyin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [50] From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces
    Uyarra, Elvira
    Flanagan, Kieron
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2010, 28 (04): : 681 - 695