Reentry Risk and Safety Assessment of Spacecraft Debris Based on Machine Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Hu [1 ]
Li, Zhihui [2 ,3 ]
Dang, Depeng [1 ]
Yang, Jingfan [1 ]
Wang, Ning [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
[2] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Mianyang 621000, Peoples R China
[3] BUAA, Natl Lab Computat Fluid Dynam, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Debris distribution; Reentry disintegration; Machine learning; Risk assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s42405-023-00652-x
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Uncontrolled spacecraft will disintegrate and generate a large amount of debris in the reentry process. Ablative debris may cause potential risks to the safety of human life and property on the ground. Therefore, predicting the landing points of spacecraft debris and forecasting the degree of risk of waste to human life and property is very important. In view that it is difficult to predict the reentry process and the reentry point in advance, the debris generated from reentry disintegration may cause ground damage for the uncontrolled space vehicle on the expiration of service. In this paper, we adopt the object-oriented approach to consider the spacecraft and its disintegrated components as consisting of simple basic geometric models and introduce three machine learning models: the support vector regression (SVR), decision tree regression (DTR), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) to predict the velocity, longitude, and latitude of spacecraft debris landing points for the first time. Then, we compare the prediction accuracy of the three models. Furthermore, we define the reentry risk and the degree of danger, and we calculate the risk level for each spacecraft debris and make warnings accordingly. The experimental results show that the proposed method can obtain high-accuracy prediction results in at least 10 s and make safety-level warning more real-time.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 35
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Financial risk assessment in shipping: a holistic machine learning based methodology
    Clintworth, Mark
    Lyridis, Dimitrios
    Boulougouris, Evangelos
    MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2023, 25 (01) : 90 - 121
  • [42] Research on personal credit risk assessment model based on machine learning
    An, Ran
    Liu, Yuanji
    Ke, Gufeng
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 187 - 187
  • [43] Financial risk assessment in shipping: a holistic machine learning based methodology
    Mark Clintworth
    Dimitrios Lyridis
    Evangelos Boulougouris
    Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2023, 25 : 90 - 121
  • [44] Rapid Assessment of Seismic Risk for Railway Bridges Based on Machine Learning
    Huang, Yong
    He, Jing
    Zhu, Zhihui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2024, 24 (06)
  • [45] Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment
    Rachman, Andika
    Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 185 : 518 - 532
  • [46] Collision of spacecraft of various shape with debris particles assessment
    Nazarenko, AI
    Spaceflight Mechanics 2004, Vol 119, Pt 1-3, 2005, 119 : 1227 - 1237
  • [47] Debris flow hazard assessment based on support vector machine
    Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
    不详
    不详
    Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci, 2006, 4 (897-900):
  • [48] Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Based on Support Vector Machine
    Yuan Lifeng
    Zhang Qingfeng
    Li Wenwen
    Zou Lanjun
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-8, 2006, : 4221 - +
  • [49] Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Based on Support Vector Machine
    YUAN Lifeng 1
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
    3. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research
    WuhanUniversityJournalofNaturalSciences, 2006, (04) : 897 - 900
  • [50] Application of machine learning to laboratory safety management assessment
    Peng, Tong
    Li, Chao
    Zhou, Xinbin
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 120 : 263 - 267