Separation of Methane and Nitrogen Using Heavy Reflux Pressure Swing Adsorption: Experiments and Modeling

被引:10
|
作者
Hu, Guoping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Yalou [1 ]
Zhao, Qinghu [1 ]
Xiao, Gongkui [2 ]
Li, Kevin Gang [1 ]
May, Eric F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Chem Engn, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Dept Chem Engn, Fluid Sci & Resources Div, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Ganjiang Innovat Acad, Ganzhou 341119, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
COAL-BED METHANE; FLUE-GAS; CO2; RECOVERY; PSA CYCLES; PERFORMANCE; ENRICHMENT; ZEOLITE; CAPTURE; CARBON; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00094
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is commonly used for the challenging task of separating methane (CH4) and nitrogen (N2) gas mixtures. Previously we used pilot-scale tests and process simulations to demonstrate how PSA cycles can be optimized for methane-nitrogen separations by adjusting the feed flow, cycle step time, and desorption pressure for a given column size. However, to produce a high-value product stream, dilute feeds with <25% CH4 generally require greater enrichment than can be achieved with optimized conventional cycles. In this work, we investigated the effects of including a heavy product reflux/purge step in PSA cycles on the separation of CH4/N2 using ionic liquidic zeolites (ILZs) as adsorbents through both pilot plant tests and process simulations. In the pilot demonstrations, the use of a heavy purge step allowed the enrichment of feed mixtures with 5.6 and 25.1% methane to 27.4 and 85.5% with recoveries of 83 and 96%, respectively, which outperforms most reported studies under similar operational conditions. However, while the refluxes increased from 74 to 80%, the recovery of CH4 dropped from 79 to 75% as CH4 was lost into the light product stream. Optimum separation performance in terms of CH4 purity and recovery occurred at a bed capacity ratio for the purge step of CPU approximately equal to 0.87, which could help guide future selections of heavy purge flow rates for a given column size and adsorbent material.
引用
收藏
页码:7114 / 7126
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nitrogen rejection from low quality natural gas by pressure swing adsorption experiments and simulation using dynamic adsorption isotherms
    Xinran Zhang
    Hua Shang
    Jiangfeng Yang
    Libo Li
    Jinping Li
    Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2022, 42 (02) : 120 - 129
  • [32] Nitrogen rejection from low quality natural gas by pressure swing adsorption experiments and simulation using dynamic adsorption isotherms
    Zhang, Xinran
    Shang, Hua
    Yang, Jiangfeng
    Li, Libo
    Li, Jinping
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 42 : 120 - 129
  • [33] GAS SEPARATION BY PRESSURE-SWING ADSORPTION
    HERDEN, H
    SCHOLLNER, R
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR CHEMIE, 1990, 30 (10): : 352 - 360
  • [34] GAS SEPARATION IN PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION PLANT
    RIQUARTS, HP
    LEITGEB, P
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 1985, 57 (10) : 843 - 849
  • [35] Pressure swing adsorption for air separation and purification
    Step, GK
    Petrovichev, MV
    CHEMICAL AND PETROLEUM ENGINEERING, 2002, 38 (3-4) : 154 - 158
  • [36] BULK GAS SEPARATION BY PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION
    CEN, P
    YANG, RT
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FUNDAMENTALS, 1986, 25 (04): : 758 - 767
  • [37] Pressure Swing Adsorption for Air Separation and Purification
    G. Kh. Step
    M. V. Petrovichev
    Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2002, 38 : 154 - 158
  • [38] Propylene/propane separation by pressure swing adsorption
    Da Silva, FA
    Rodrigues, AE
    ADSORPTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, : 537 - 541
  • [39] NUMERICAL STUDY OF ARGON EFFECT ON NITROGEN SEPARATION FROM AIR BY PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION
    Mhdi, Abdulbasit Hassan
    Salih, Suhaib Shwish
    Ayuob, Heba Sa'ady
    Ghosh, Tushar
    IIUM ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 21 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [40] Producing Nitrogen via Pressure Swing Adsorption
    Ivanova, Svetlana
    Lewis, Robert
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2012, 108 (06) : 38 - 42