Effects of PK-guided prophylaxis on clinical outcomes and FVIII consumption for patients with moderate to severe Haemophilia A

被引:2
|
作者
Young, Guy [1 ]
Callaghan, Michael U. [2 ]
Balasa, Vinod [3 ]
Soni, Amit [4 ]
Ahuja, Sanjay [5 ]
Roberts, Jonathan C. [6 ]
Simpson, Mindy L. [7 ]
Kizilocak, Hande [1 ]
Frick, Andrew [8 ]
Mokdad, Ali G. [9 ]
Xing, Shan [9 ]
Caicedo, Jorge [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Childrens Hosp Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Michigan, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Valley Childrens Healthcare, Hemotol Oncol, Madera, CA USA
[4] Ctr Inherited Blood Disorders, Orange, CA USA
[5] UH Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hosp, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Bleeding & Clotting Disorders Inst, Peoria, IL USA
[7] Rush Univ Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[8] Trio Hlth Inc, Louisville, CO USA
[9] Takeda Pharmaceut USA, 95 Hayden Ave, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
FVIII; Haemophilia A; PK-guided prophylaxis; POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS; FACTOR-VIII;
D O I
10.1111/hae.14826
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionIn recent years, there has been increased focus on individualizing treatment for persons with hemophilia including pharmacokinetic-guided (PK) dosing. AimsIn this retrospective study clinical outcomes before and after PK-guided prophylaxis were examined. Materials and methodsEight Haemophilia Treatment Centres from the United States participated in the study and included 132 patients classified into two cohorts: those undergoing a PK-assessment for product switch (switchers) or to optimize treatment (non-switchers). Subset analyses for the two most common products and patients with dosing per prescription label were included for annual bleeding rates (ABR), mean weekly consumption outcomes, and annualized cost of prophylaxis. ResultsThe most common products before and after index date were octocog alfa, rurioctocog alfa pegol, and efmoroctocog alfa. Seventy-four (56%) patients were identified as switchers and 58 (44%) patients were classified as non-switchers. The majority of patients (78.0%) experienced either a decrease in ABR post-index or maintained 0 ABR during pre- and post-index time periods, with similar proportions identified in both switchers (77.0%) and non-switchers (79.3%) populations. Non-switchers were identified as having no significant change in cost of therapy, while switchers experienced increased cost of therapy driven by higher price of extended half-life products. Within subset analyses, patients receiving rurioctocog alfa pegol and efmoroctocog alfa had mean ABR under 1 after index date. ConclusionPK-guided prophylaxis has the potential to improve clinical outcomes without increase in cost of therapy for patients maintaining product and can aid in maintaining effective protection against bleeds in those switching product.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1242
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term analysis of the benefit of prophylaxis for adult patients with severe or moderate haemophilia A
    Miesbach, Wolfgang
    Kittler, Sabine
    Bauhofer, Artur
    Koenigs, Christoph
    Becker, Thomas
    Nemes, Laszlo
    Staus, Alexander
    Schuettrumpf, Joerg
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2020, 26 (03) : 467 - 477
  • [22] Association of prophylaxis regimen with FVIII and treatment outcomes in Latin America patients with severe hemophilia A
    Perez Bianco, P.
    Berges, A.
    Soto, V.
    Linares, A.
    Krishnan, S.
    Xiong, Y.
    Aguilar, L.
    Gomez, J.
    Arvizu, J.
    Brabata, C.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2012, 18 : 143 - 143
  • [23] Indication, Resource Consumption and Clinical Outcomes of Prophylaxis in Adult Patients with Severe Hemophilia a in Routine Clinical Practice
    Eva Mingot-Castellano, Mara
    Gonzalez-Diaz, Laura
    Tamayo-Bermejo, Rocio
    Isabel Heiniger-Mazo, Ana
    BLOOD, 2014, 124 (21)
  • [24] Different prophylaxis regimens in young severe hemophilia A patients: efficacy, FVIII consumption, and therapy compliance
    Biondo, F.
    Santoro, C.
    Baldacci, E.
    Leporace, A.
    Foa, R.
    Mazzucconi, M.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2012, 18 : 20 - 20
  • [25] Correlation between ABR and PK parameters in patients with severe haemophilia A receiving Turoctocog alfa (NOVOEIGHT®) for prophylaxis
    Jimenez-Yuste, V
    Lejniece, S.
    Rosholm, A.
    Tripkovic, N.
    Santagostino, E.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2015, 13 : 352 - 353
  • [26] A Comparison of the Incidence Rate for Joint Bleeding and FVIII Consumption between On-Demand versus Prophylaxis Factor VIII Replacement Therapy and the Direct Cost of Prophylaxis Treatment in Severe Haemophilia A Patients
    Jamal, Munirah
    Sathar, Jameela
    Jamari, Jamaliah
    Saffian, Shamin Mohd
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 30 (01): : 129 - 136
  • [27] Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of bleeding outcomes in severe haemophilia A: Comparing valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy, emicizumab prophylaxis, and FVIII replacement prophylaxis
    Astermark, Jan
    Buckner, Tyler W.
    Frenzel, Laurent
    Hatswell, Anthony J.
    You, Xiaojun
    Liu, Hai
    Goodman, Erin
    Santos, Sandra
    Hawes, Charles
    Hinds, David
    Klamroth, Robert
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2023, 29 (04) : 1087 - 1094
  • [28] Clinical phenotype of severe and moderate haemophilia: Who should receive prophylaxis and what is the target trough level?
    Collins, Peter W.
    Obaji, Samya G.
    Roberts, Heledd
    Gorsani, Deepan
    Rayment, Rachel
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2021, 27 (02) : 192 - 198
  • [29] Economic analysis of an early prophylaxis regimen to reduce FVIII inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPS) with severe haemophilia A
    Auerswald, G.
    Kurnik, K.
    Epstein, J. D.
    Crea, R.
    Reininger, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2011, 9 : 825 - 825
  • [30] Real-world experience on the tolerability and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A with and without FVIII inhibitors
    Hassan, Eman
    Jonathan, Lancashire
    Jayashree, Motwani
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2021, 27 (06) : E698 - E703