Machine learning as a tool to identify inpatients who are not at risk of adverse drug events in a large dataset of a tertiary care hospital in the USA

被引:1
|
作者
Langenberger, Benedikt [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Hlth Care Management, Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
adverse drug events; decision support; machine learning; predictive modelling; OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE; VARIABLE SELECTION; PREDICTION MODELS; AREA; EMERGENCY; CLASSIFICATION; REGULARIZATION; SURVEILLANCE; SENSITIVITY; IMPUTATION;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.15846
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AimsAdverse drug events (ADEs) are a major threat to inpatients in the United States of America (USA). It is unknown how well machine learning (ML) is able to predict whether or not a patient will suffer from an ADE during hospital stay based on data available at hospital admission for emergency department patients of all ages (binary classification task). It is further unknown whether ML is able to outperform logistic regression (LR) in doing so, and which variables are the most important predictors. MethodsIn this study, 5 ML models- namely a random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM), ridge regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and elastic net regression-as well as a LR were trained and tested for the prediction of inpatient ADEs identified using ICD-10-CM codes based on comprehensive previous work in a diverse population. In total, 210 181 observations from patients who were admitted to a large tertiary care hospital after emergency department stay between 2011 and 2019 were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and AUC-precision-recall (AUC-PR) were used as primary performance indicators. ResultsTree-based models performed best with respect to AUC and AUC-PR. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) reached an AUC of 0.747 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.735 to 0.759) and an AUC-PR of 0.134 (95% CI: 0.131 to 0.137) on unforeseen test data, while the random forest reached an AUC of 0.743 (95% CI: 0.731 to 0.755) and an AUC-PR of 0.139 (95% CI: 0.135 to 0.142), respectively. ML statistically significantly outperformed LR both on AUC and AUC-PR. Nonetheless, overall, models did not differ much with respect to their performance. Most important predictors were admission type, temperature and chief complaint for the best performing model (GBM). ConclusionsThe study demonstrated a first application of ML to predict inpatient ADEs based on ICD-10-CM codes, and a comparison with LR. Future research should address concerns arising from low precision and related problems.
引用
收藏
页码:3523 / 3538
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adverse drug events in Chinese pediatric inpatients and associated risk factors: a retrospective review using the Global Trigger Tool
    Huan-huan Ji
    Lin Song
    Jian-wen Xiao
    Yu-xia Guo
    Ping Wei
    Ting-ting Tang
    Xiao-jiang Tian
    Xue-wen Tang
    Yun-tao Jia
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [22] Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) in the inpatients of medicine department of a rural tertiary care teaching hospital and influence of pharmacovigilance in reporting ADR
    Gor, A. P.
    Desai, S. V.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 40 (01) : 37 - 40
  • [23] CAUSALITY, SEVERITY AND PREVENTABILITY PROFILING OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS AMONG MEDICINE INPATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE PUBLIC TEACHING HOSPITAL, INDIA
    Dar, M. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A38 - A38
  • [24] Predicting Individual Patient Platelet Demand in a Large Tertiary Care Hospital Using Machine Learning
    Engelke, Merlin
    Brieske, Christian Martin
    Parmar, Vicky
    Flaschel, Nils
    Kureishi, Anisa
    Hosch, Rene
    Koitka, Sven
    Schmidt, Cynthia Sabrina
    Horn, Peter A.
    Nensa, Felix
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE AND HEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 50 (04) : 277 - 285
  • [25] Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Identify Patients Before Surgery at High Risk for Postoperative Adverse Events
    Mahajan, Aman
    Esper, Stephen
    Oo, Thien Htay
    McKibben, Jeffery
    Garver, Michael
    Artman, Jamie
    Klahre, Cynthia
    Ryan, John
    Sadhasivam, Senthilkumar
    Holder-Murray, Jennifer
    Marroquin, Oscar C.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (07) : E2322285
  • [26] Using machine learning ( XGBoost) to predict the risk of development of steroid induced hyperglycaemia amongst hospital inpatients in a large teaching hospital
    Sainsbury, C. A. R.
    McKeag, C.
    Barker, H.
    Morrison, D.
    Jones, G. C.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2023, 40
  • [27] Profile of Serious Adverse Drug Events in a Tertiary Care Hospital of South India-a Five Years Example Abstracts
    Pasha, M. Y.
    Muraraiah, S.
    Jayanthi, C. R.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 39 (10) : 992 - 992
  • [28] Use of Medicare Administrative Claims to Identify a Population at High Risk for Adverse Drug Events and Hospital Use for Quality Improvement
    Digmann, Rachel
    Thomas, Anita
    Peppercorn, Sherry
    Ryan, Amanda
    Zhang, Lijing
    Irby, Kimberly
    Brock, Jane
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2019, 25 (03): : 402 - 410
  • [29] SUPRA-THERAPEUTIC LEVELS OF INFLIXIMAB DO NOT INCREASE THE RISK OF INFECTIONS OR ADVERSE EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH IBD: A LARGE TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL COHORT STUDY
    Bhattacharya, Abhik
    Rao, Bhavana Bhagya
    El-Khider, Faris A.
    Lee, Helen
    Osterman, Mark T.
    Lichtenstein, Gary R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S671 - S672
  • [30] Clinical Audit of Perioperative Adverse Events in Pediatric Patients at 125 Bedded Tertiary Care Hospital Based on WHO Operational Guidelines
    Panjwani, Bhavita G.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (06): : 2590 - 2592